Thread replies: 142
Thread images: 46
Thread images: 46
File: 1487830532566.webm (2MB, 1866x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1866x1080px
>ugh how dare you film me creep!
>I just want to be comfortable!
>>
and now you know why women shouldnt be allowed to vote
>>
>>35147794
If I rueld the world, their roles wold just be baby makers and sperm receptacles.
>>
>>35147759
>she tries to cover her ass at the end
nope, too late bitch, i've stored mental polaroids of your ass which I will later masturbate to
>>
File: 1483309339097.jpg (63KB, 768x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 768x1024px
>ugh did you just take my picture?
>>
File: 1487966873590.jpg (561KB, 1461x1959px) Image search:
[Google]
561KB, 1461x1959px
>wtf are you doing pervert!?
>>
>>35147759
>tfw on phone since laptop is down
Fuuuug
>>
File: 1373701537583.jpg (20KB, 413x395px) Image search:
[Google]
20KB, 413x395px
i need more of these
>>
File: 1481936355804.jpg (202KB, 920x1127px) Image search:
[Google]
202KB, 920x1127px
>oh em gee Rhodesia, I think that fat guy just took our picture!
>>
I came in my pants
>>
>>35148111
>tfw so many creepshots from HS i still fap to
I miss those days, school was the best
>>
Shes wearing a bikini swimsuit in a beach place that doesn't give you a right to shove a camera up on her butt...
>>
>mmmm yeah anon, oh, mmph, haha
>you love taking pictures of me right?
>mmph oh haha, i think i feel something coming
>BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPHHHHHPPHHHHHHHHHLPLPL
>teehee, excuse me anon, i had some beef tacos for lunch today
>>
>>35149463
>that doesn't give you a right to shove a camera up on her butt...
yes it does...
>>
>>35147759
BRAAAAAAAAPTTPATPATPPTPATP
*sniffs*
>>
File: 1487963699539.png (584KB, 720x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
584KB, 720x1280px
>>35149463
>public place
>doesn't give you the right
KEK
>>
>>35148323
>those sunglasses
>cut-off jeans
>phone in hand
>and not an original thought in her head
God, what textbook example, bravo.
>>
File: 3452352.jpg (75KB, 960x720px) Image search:
[Google]
75KB, 960x720px
>>35149505
>>35149540
This is why I never forgot to bring a shawl
>>
File: 1483308168995.jpg (420KB, 1379x1034px) Image search:
[Google]
420KB, 1379x1034px
>>35149625
well get you one way or another
>>
File: 45634637.jpg (217KB, 2400x1599px) Image search:
[Google]
217KB, 2400x1599px
>>35149736
can you not lol
I live in a beach town and you guys are making me paranoid now
>>
File: 1421321098702.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2592x1936px
>>35149625
>shawl
>implying that would stop me
Pls, if you're a woman you're only safe in your home
>>
>creepshots are 100% legal
God bless america
>>
File: 1462750945220.jpg (542KB, 1200x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
542KB, 1200x1200px
>>35149843
your ass is already being shares on candid sites across the internet
you should be flattered
>>
File: 1487959283315.jpg (391KB, 1242x1557px) Image search:
[Google]
391KB, 1242x1557px
>>35149928
It's actually illegal in yurocuck land.
I almost feel bad for them
>>
File: 4563463.jpg (129KB, 792x649px) Image search:
[Google]
129KB, 792x649px
>>35149893
But you dont even know me what would be the point? A random picture of a guy I dont know wouldnt really get me off I need to know him
>>35150019
Where is the fun in that if I dont know they are getting off to me? boo
>>
File: 1467132811158.webm (2MB, 1080x606px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1080x606px
>>35150104
>you need to know the person to fap to them
You dont understand male sexuality at all
>>
File: 1476140193196.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1280x720px
>>35150104
I don't have to know you, it's your sexual jiggling flesh thats going to get me off.
>>
>>35150145
i want to get smothered to death by this
>>
>>35147794
I would say that roughly 80% of the population shouldn't be allowed to vote. The average person is a fucking retard who can't even name the three branches of government
>>
File: 572457.jpg (152KB, 499x1332px) Image search:
[Google]
152KB, 499x1332px
>>35150145
I suppose Ive helped a couple robots cum but prefer a little emotional connection and there name at least lmao
>>35150181
I admit I sometimes look at bulges in public just out of curiosity
>>
>>35150358
What are you? Why even go through that much effort? There's trolling and just wasting your time.
>>
File: 1459379646946.jpg (283KB, 600x1037px) Image search:
[Google]
283KB, 600x1037px
>>35150358
help me cum plz
my name is bill
>>
>>35150394
>what are you
just sympathetically curious but if you think I'm trolling thats fine
>>
All men deserve death tbqh
>>
>>35150426
How could I do that if i dont know you or know what you like?
>>35150523
No. No they do not
>>
>>35150358
>I suppose Ive helped a couple robots cum
Post pics of your T&A, might as well do it again
>>
>>35148650
>Rhodesia
her father is clearly a /k/ommando
>>
>>35150595
I like ass and I like you so I like your ass, pls post pics.
>>
File: 1416189618204.jpg (114KB, 640x960px) Image search:
[Google]
114KB, 640x960px
>>35150595
post your tits and/or ass and ill fap to it
>>
>>35150595
Hi I am Steve and I like ass
>>
>>35148650
mods I THINK WE GOT SOME PIZZA HERE
>>
File: STAR-530.png (299KB, 532x430px) Image search:
[Google]
299KB, 532x430px
>>35150610
>>35150656
>>35150673
>>35150680
You faggots, know you're talking to a dude right..?
>>
File: roast beef flaps in the wind.png (1MB, 1348x790px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1348x790px
>roastie on the streetcorner publicly displaying her crotch with a 180 degree leg spread
>how dare you take a picture you disgusting creeper you can't do that it's not okay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMxsSj3EHIY
>>
i am sure some bitch took a pic of me once
>>
>>35150705
>wearing a bikini & a shirt
>pizza
neck yourself you dumb fuck
>>
>>35150724
Fucking goober
>>
>>35150723
a passable trap tho?
>>
>>35150747
shut the fuck up pedo
You have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was not original.
>>
>>35150723
She is a dude? origami desu
>>
File: Socrates_Massimo_Inv1236.jpg (2MB, 1640x2475px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1640x2475px
>>35150251
This, 0% women and 20% of the few intellectual men should only be allowed to vote.
>>
>>35150610
>>35150656
>>35150673
Well it was not on a thread last time lol
and I talked to those robots for a few days
>>
File: 1451340125629.jpg (353KB, 1267x1604px) Image search:
[Google]
353KB, 1267x1604px
She got embarrassed
>>
>>35150724
Was that supposed to be some sort of gymnastic performance? Wasn't that impressive to be honest.
>>
File: 1463012150974.jpg (39KB, 657x527px) Image search:
[Google]
39KB, 657x527px
>>35150835
Okay roastie this has gone on long enough post tits or ass or gtfo
>>
>>35148650
Mmm, I bet they're just barely at the age of consent in their country
>>
File: 4563463.jpg (149KB, 792x649px) Image search:
[Google]
149KB, 792x649px
>>35150864
If I did it wouldn't be on here
So forgive me then sir
I'll take my leave
>>
>>35150910
Good riddance cunt
>>
>>35147759
How would you feel if you were at the beach and some gay perv guy came up to you with his camera trying to get shots of your bulge or ass or whatever? And then uploaded them for other pervs to drool over and share?
>>35149540
Your rights end where other peoples rights begin. And it's certainly her right to not have people take pictures of her ass to upload online.
>>
>>35150960
I'd freak out because I completely forgot to wear jeans that day. If you don't want any risk at all, stop wearing skimpy shit. It's like going into a crime ridden neighborhood with cash strapped to your body.
>>
File: jeans.webm (497KB, 400x400px) Image search:
[Google]
497KB, 400x400px
>>35150960
What's the difference from me looking at her ass, or whether I take a picture of it? Not much. One is just taking a physical memory instead of a mental one.
These sluts are asking for it anyway, Why do you think they bother squeezing their flesh in the tightest clothes possible instead of just wearing comfy loose clothing
>>
>>35150836
>wear clothes tight that don't cover half your ass
>try to pull it down to hide your flabby ass anyway
Women
>>
>>35150960
I wouldn't give a solitary fuck tbqh
>>
>>35150960
>Your rights end where other peoples rights begin. And it's certainly her right to not have people take pictures of her ass to upload online.
But seeing her like that is fine? Why is it suddenly bad just because its documented?
>>
File: 9ec5646566d126b47aefe9016de8c053.600x.jpg (100KB, 500x617px) Image search:
[Google]
100KB, 500x617px
>>35150960
i dont walk around with my bare asscheeks on display
>>
>>35150960
>And it's certainly her right to not have people take pictures of her ass to upload online.
In public you have no right to be not be filmed because you have no expectation of privacy in a public place.
Fuck your feelings and learn the facts you entitled roastie cunthole
>>
>used to snap pics of sluts on my shitty flip phone in high school
>one girl obviously noticed after I targeted her every day for weeks
>she continued to wear tight, slutty clothing
I don't get women
>>
>>35151752
Nobody does. Nobody ever did, ever since the dawn of man.
>>
>>35150181
Looks like a high school lol that's fucked
>>
>>35151023
That's victim blaming and false equivalency. Getting robbed because you didn't take reasonable precautions doesn't make the robber less guilty.
A woman wearing a bikini gives you just as much right to take creepshots as a man walking around with his wallet hanging out of his pocket gives you the right to steal from him.
>>35151086
Mental images can't be stored permanently, copied and distributed to millions of people or sold for profit. And really? They're asking for it? Next you're gonna tell me raping passed out drunk chicks is totally fine because they were asking for it by being unconcious.
>>35151211
Maybe when someone sends a link of a gay porn site with your pictures on it to your friends, family and employer you would.
>>35151266
In civilized countries people have certain rights when it comes to pictures of themselves. In the case of creepshots the rights of the victim outweigh the rights of the photographer, public space or no.
>>35151442
Being in public does not erase your right to privacy, it just comes into conflict with others. In the case of creepshots your personal rights outweigh those of the photographer. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say anything and being in public doesn't mean you can take pictures of everything.
>>
>>35151819
>implying you can't be 18 in HS
>>
>>35151833
>Next you're gonna tell me raping passed out drunk chicks is totally fine because they were asking for it by being unconcious.
Yes. they wouldn't have gotten drunk around strangers otherwise. It's common sense.
>Mental images can't be stored permanently
Exactly, hence why we take pics.
>copied and distributed to millions of people or sold for profit. And really? They're asking for it?
I doubt anyone is actually buying candid pics...they're just spankbank material, and if you're in a public place you shouldn't have a problem with getting photographed. If it bothers you cover up and quit dressing like a whore
>>
>>35151833
>i'm gonna dress like a whore and let everyone see my slut parts
>oh no! ugly people are looking at my slut parts! muh riiights!!!
>>
>>35151833
How about I just do it anyway.
>>
>>35151833
>That's victim blaming and false equivalency.
Victim blaming is a social construct
>>
>>35151833
>Being in public does not erase your right to privacy, it just comes into conflict with others. In the case of creepshots your personal rights outweigh those of the photographer. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say anything and being in public doesn't mean you can take pictures of everything.
stop being such a pussyfaggot, if you're walking around with your tits and ass hanging out don't be surprised if people look at your tits and ass
again, fuck your smelly cunthole
>>
>>35151949
>Yes. they wouldn't have gotten drunk around strangers otherwise. It's common sense.
Yeahhhh so what if i put a little something in her drink to help the process along, she was clearly asking for it i mean she was at a bar and looked at me.
You're disgusting.
>Exactly, hence why we take pics.
You're contradicting yourself now. If there were no significant difference there would be no need to take pictures.
>I doubt anyone is actually buying candid pics...they're just spankbank material, and if you're in a public place you shouldn't have a problem with getting photographed. If it bothers you cover up and quit dressing like a whore
The profit part is not even important. And yes, if you are in public you have to expect that you might show up on photographs that other people take. It would be ridiculous if a private person had to ask permission of everyone in their holiday pictures, their rights have more weight in that scenario. But when you start taking pictures of individuals, and on top of that clearly pornographic ones the rights of the person being photographed are more worthy of protection than your right to jerk it to pics of strangers. And so is the right for everyone to dress how they want to (within the local cultural norms) without being harassed by perverts.
>>35152196
And? It exists. It's a problem. What's your point?
>>
Stop feeding the troll. Do not reply.
Post more creepshots.
>>
>>35149463
>bikini ;) swimsuit
Next time wear a regular swimswuit, you fucking whore kek
>>
>>35152272
>Yeahhhh so what if i put a little something in her drink to help the process along, she was clearly asking for it i mean she was at a bar and looked at me.
>You're disgusting.
I never said that. A woman getting wasted is her own decision. Me slipping something in her drink wouldn't
>You're contradicting yourself now. If there were no significant difference there would be no need to take pictures.
wtf are you talking about? I already said there was a difference. Pictures are nice for physical memories, which is why I take them... derp
>But when you start taking pictures of individuals, and on top of that clearly pornographic ones the rights of the person being photographed are more worthy of protection than your right to jerk it to pics of strangers
Yes everyone does have the right to dress how they want, just like how I have the right to take pictures of who I want. See how that works? Welcome to America.
Also, you really need to look up the definition of "pornographic" because you seem confused. A butt in clothing is hardly that
>>
File: 1459521222990.jpg (611KB, 1343x1932px) Image search:
[Google]
611KB, 1343x1932px
women love candids desu
>>
>>35150075
I hear you bro, nothing is more freedom than this, except when you get 10 years in jail for having sex with a 17 years 12 months old girl, but it's a small price compared to this.
>>
>>35151086
>the girl is happy to be creepshotted if you're a Chad
>>
>>35152272
You're the one beaming reflected protons into my camera's lenses.
>>
File: 30197083447.jpg (62KB, 640x560px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 640x560px
>>35147759
>robots get mad when normies take their picture and put it on social media to make fun of them
>sees no problem with taking photos of women to jerk off to them later
>>
File: ade8141b4a8b23d9a8ee56298adc0cc5.600x.jpg (60KB, 500x667px) Image search:
[Google]
60KB, 500x667px
is this in fact comfortable?
>>
>>35152685
>>robots get mad when normies take their picture and put it on social media to make fun of them
when this ever happened?
>>
>>35152691
What a lucky kid, having a mom like that around the house after puberty is going to be heavenly
>>
>>35152573
>protons
how was this not original
>>
File: 1393263936267.jpg (52KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
52KB, 600x600px
>>35152730
It probably happens all the time, we just don't know about it
>>
File: q0wT6eT.jpg (377KB, 927x1455px) Image search:
[Google]
377KB, 927x1455px
>>35152730
Are you saying you'd be OK with it?
>>
anyone got the webm of a woman noticing the camera and pull her leggings higher?
>>
>>35152799
why are niggers always doing homoerotic shit like this
>>
>>35152260
You can be a pathetic creep that stares at girls all you want, but you cross the line when you shove your phone under their skirt or up against their asses and take pictures. Do you hate women so much that you can't even let them have that bit of decency?
>>35152458
>I never said that.
True, i was trying to show how your thinking is analogous to that sentiment
>A woman getting wasted is her own decision.
Yeah. She decided to get wasted. She didn't decide to get raped, that's on you, regardless of whether you roofied her or filled her up or she did it all on her own.
>wtf are you talking about? I already said there was a difference. Pictures are nice for physical memories, which is why I take them... derp
Your argument >>35151086 was that because you can see them it's also okay to take pictures because there's no significat difference between the two. That's obviously not true and you said so yourself now.
>Yes everyone does have the right to dress how they want, just like how I have the right to take pictures of who I want. See how that works? Welcome to America.
The right to choose how you dress is a fundamental part of a free society and safeguards freedom of expression. The right to take creepshots helps you jerk it. One is more valuable than the other, and the same applies to the right of a woman to wear skimpy clothes without being harrassed.
>Also, you really need to look up the definition of "pornographic" because you seem confused. A butt in clothing is hardly that
An image is pornographic when main function is to arouse. That's what creepshots are. If you take a picture of the entire beach and there's some bare ass mixed in it's not pornography, when you take a close up of one womans ass it is.
>>
>>35150960
>How would you feel if you were at the beach and some gay perv guy came up to you with his camera trying to get shots of your bulge or ass or whatever? And then uploaded them for other pervs to drool over and share?
wouldnt bother me because i dont walk around nearly naked you dumb fucking cunt. my ass or dick isnt visible at all in my swim trunks
>>
>>35149549
>haha stupid roastie
>they don't think deep thoughts like me
>haha yeah, like how we're so insignificant in the galaxy
>what if life is a simulation
>what if we're immortal beings with 80 year long dreams
>wow yeah so deep and original
>roasties just think about shoes and boys tho
Dumb frogposter
>>
>>35152942
hes just saying she looks stereotypical, relax
>>
>>35151833
>That's victim blaming
its not victim blaming when taking pictures in public isnt a crime you stupid fuck
>>
>>35152886
>Your argument >>35151086 was that because you can see them it's also okay to take pictures because there's no significat difference between the two. That's obviously not true and you said so yourself now.
It is true. The only difference is that cameras store images better than the human brain.
>>
>>35152882
dumb pigskin
>>
File: 1435248588663.webm (1MB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 640x480px
why do women show off their cheeks
I dont show my cheeks off when im at the beach
>>
>>35153091
Because their round buttcheeks are a secondary sexual chracteristic that evolved to attract sexual partners and women heavily rely on sexual attraction in society. They want to be seem and judged because of their sexual value. That's why they do it.
>>
>>35152691
Why do people that have never worn tight clothes think they're uncomfortable? If the fabric is nice and especially if you're shaved it's heavenly comfort levels
>>
>>35152886
>She didn't decide to get raped
>These guys are total strangers, who I've never met before
>oh well I'll definitely get drunk out of my mind and fall unconscious.
>I totally don't want them to fuck me at all heh
Makes sense
>Your argument .....
I sad "Not much" meaning the difference was small, I never said there wasn't one at all.
>One is more valuable than the other, and the same applies to the right of a woman to wear skimpy clothes without being harrassed.
The value honestly doesn't matter, it's still a right. Also women are hardly getting harassed either. Most of the pictures are taken w/o them knowing.
>An image is pornographic when main function is to arouse
When the images has erotic behavior, and that's subjective depending on the person.
I highly doubt a judge would deem a butt in jeans as pornographic
>>
>>35153091
they've been taught that this is just what women do
>>
File: 6e4a4fb14ccecc1fa91b819fe9d7debd.600x.jpg (77KB, 586x900px) Image search:
[Google]
77KB, 586x900px
>womens magazines
>full of candid celeb pictures
>>
File: 1487964307864.jpg (250KB, 768x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
250KB, 768x1024px
>>35153091
The same reason men can show off their chest at the beach w/o a problem.
It's just a societal norm.
>>
>>35152882
they have low inhibitions and can pretty much do anything and if someone speaks out against them DAS RAYCISS
>>
File: uncomfortable stare.jpg (35KB, 456x456px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 456x456px
>>35152685
>robots don't dress provocatively and try to not do anything that would bring attention to them
>normalcunts make fun of them and take pictures of them, while white-knighting women who clearly wear exposing clothes to flaunt their asses
>>
>>35152882
The vast majority of homosexuals have experienced some form of abuse. While there is no definite cause of homosexuality, there's strong evidence to suggest that a major component is abuse during childhood.
Most blacks abuse their children in some form, and hence there's a higher incidence of homosexuality among blacks.
>>
>>35153056
It is a crime when it invades another persons privacy significantly. And no you don not forgo all your privacy when you are out in public. Many states have laws that prohibit upskirts and the like for that very reason. The only thing you can argue about is where exactly the line should be drawn.
>>35153058
Significantly better, to the point where it's not even comparable. They can be losslessly stored indefinitely and can be copied and distributed at will all over the world. Calling that the "only" difference is utterly disingenuous.
>>35153205
There's this thing, it's highly valued in free societies, one of the basic foundations on which western society and law is built. It's called consent. You should look that up, a lot of people have been arguing about how it should apply to sexual relations for a long time. I'll give you a hint though, passed out people are usually not considered to be capable of consenting to anything.
>I sad "Not much" meaning the difference was small, I never said there wasn't one at all.
I already replied to this above. The difference is massive.
>The value honestly doesn't matter, it's still a right.
That's not how rights work. Rights exsists to protect things we value. When two things we value come into conflict we have to decide which one is worth protecting more. Your rights end where the rights of others begin.
>When the images has erotic behavior, and that's subjective depending on the person.
I highly doubt a judge would deem a butt in jeans as pornographic
That's true, there's no clear definition of pornography. Legally you can probably take pictures of clothed asses and not get punished, but just because something is techinically legal does not make it morally justifiable.
>>
File: 1484881783529.jpg (71KB, 720x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
71KB, 720x1280px
>>35153654
W/e, whether you like it or not, creeps are legal, and people are going to continue taking them.
It's as simple as that
>>
>>35149843
Don't worry, nobody will want to do a creepshot on your disgusting, fat, greasy body.
>>
>>35153546
>The vast majority of homosexuals have experienced some form of abuse.
[citation needed]
>Most blacks abuse their children in some form
[citation needed]
>>
>>35153654
>Significantly better, to the point where it's not even comparable. They can be losslessly stored indefinitely and can be copied and distributed at will all over the world. Calling that the "only" difference is utterly disingenuous.
But it is. Images are not anyone's property. They are only electrical signals interpreted either by a brain or an electronic device. They are not your body or any of your belongings in any way. Even if the protons that you reflected into someone's eyes or camera are your property somehow, they were launched from you and not even captured by the camera. They were reflected back at you and to all other directions.
>>
File: 1464206527854.jpg (103KB, 447x750px) Image search:
[Google]
103KB, 447x750px
why do women expose their feet
men do not do this
>>
>>35153953
Because they are dainty and are too a cue of sexual dimorphism able to attracted the sexual desire of potential mates.
>>
>>35150832
because i'm sure the average /r9k/ user is part of that 20%
>>
>>35154014
Implying we care that much to go out of our homes and vote.
>>
File: 13245404_281302185535642_6814622348289540765_n.jpg (29KB, 600x400px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 600x400px
if a bunch of girls were schlicking to my pics Id be flattered desu
>>
>>35153199
Because they look uncomfortable and they wouldn't know better if they had never worn them before?
Fuck, you're either 9 or mentally retarded.
>>
>>35153314
Men don't have anything sexual on their chests though, women do. And butts are attractive on women because it means its easier for them to give birth, which makes males desire them.
>>
>>35154189
>Men don't have anything sexual on their chests though
To you maybe cause you're not attracted to that.
Women love pectoral muscles, and men also have nipples. Like I said society shapes what taboo and what isnt
>>
>>35150724
I'm all up in your shit so what fuck
>>
>>35153744
The question was never whether they can or do take them but if they should be.
I think it should be basic human decency to not treat women in public like a DIY-porno mag but hey that's just me.
>>35153949
An image is persistent. A memory is not.
An image can be losslessly copied. A memory can not be copied at all.
An image can be distributed. A memory can not.
Taking a picture requires intent. Creating a memory does not.
You can own a picture, or the rights to something that is depicted in one, but you cannot own a memory.
Your argument is ridiculous, a picture and a memory are fundamentally different in all of their defining properties.
>>
>>35148650
>Rhodesia
I think you mean Zimbabwe
>>
>>35154291
You don't own the rights to your image in public spaces. Still, an image is only a representation of a physical state that have or might have not happened. It is not your property in any way and you don't have rights over it. Memories and images are basicaly the same thing. Electrical signals interpreted either by biological matter or an electornical device. They are nothing but organized sets of data. You can't deny that and there's nothing you can do about it because images don't violate any of your rights and thinking against this logic only opens up space for a slippery slope of censorship of any other kind of data.
>>
File: 1486832538623.gif (2MB, 202x360px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 202x360px
>>35152942
t. roastie
origi
>>
File: 1475811419392.webm (2MB, 1000x750px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1000x750px
>>35154291
We're robots
To us women are nothing but fuck meat used to squeeze out semen. If you're looking for decency you're in the wrong place, maybe you'll feel better fucking off to redit
>>
>>35152272
>and on top of that clearly pornographic
How would a picture become porno? That is determined solely by the material provided, i.e. what the woman is showing off
>>
>>35150960
>How would you feel if you were at the beach and some gay perv guy came up to you with his camera trying to get shots of your bulge or ass or whatever?
Whatever floats his boat.
>>
>>35154649
shes wearing pads
>>
>>35155436
pads don't jiggle like that, looks like natural booty to me
>>
>>35154291
Do you think every guy is just scrambling to get behind a woman and take a video of a woman's ass?
I don't give a fuck who you are, if you're wearing practically nothing someone is going to take advantage of that, by taking a picture or cat calling or whatever. You can't stop something before it happens, this isn't Psycho Pass. Shit happens, protect yourself if you care so much.
You don't leave your door unlocked in case of burglars, there is no victim shaming. It's being smart.
Degenerates will be degenerates.
>>
File: 1406605569418.jpg (65KB, 523x592px) Image search:
[Google]
65KB, 523x592px
>>35154291
>backpedaling this hard
it's adorable
>>
>>35152691
Can't believe a mother would actually walk around in public like this..
>>
>>35156862
>popping out crotchfruit suddenly makes someone modest
>>
>>35157172
It should at least change your values, it's called maturing
>>
>>35156862
the contrast is turned way up on the pic to make it look more form defining and tight than it really is
>>
>>35154014
Why would /r9k/ vote? Most of us wouldn't be smart enough, and I'm fine with that. The most capable should, or be allowed to, run the country.
>>
>>35158020
except the top 20% would use their power to make robot lives even more miserable than their are now
>>
>>35158020
Neetbux, just imagine if we had Bernie as president instead of Trump
>>
>>35154291
My memory is different than yours.
Thread posts: 142
Thread images: 46
Thread images: 46