MORAL QUESTION TIME

Yeah. Stop now.

>>35134287
You should probably delete it as it's considered child pornography in the US, and if you ever become the target of a kike smear campaign you better believe jewgle and kikebook will discover that remotely. It's one of those cases where you're not a monster for having it, but you really need to get rid of it.

>>35134287
Well it depends how old she is dumbass

>>35134329
Gonna need more than that.

Is there a reason? They were both pubescent and had curves in the right places. Does it suddenly become immoral as soon as you turn 18? Are you supposed to stop being attracted to it? It sounds awfully arbitrary.

>>35134381
This is purely hypothetical, anon.

>>35134394
Same age.

>>35134411
>awfully arbitrary

Welcome to sex crimes in modern society.

>sure go ahead and watch these videos of jihadists beheading people, it's sick but it's already happened no harm no foul
>OMG STOP THIS CP A CHILD IS DESTROYED EVERY TIME IT IS VIEWED

>>35134287
>Does perusing this evidence on a lonely weekend make you a pedophile?
that's not what pedophile means

it's illegal tho

I think of girls I knew when we were both younger, and occasionally a girl that's really showing off- I not gonna do shit tho

>>35134287
Parents have been arrested for pictures of their 2 year old girl with no shirt on, anon, it doesn't look good for your circumstances.

>>35134287
delete it asap, the second you piss her off she's going to report you if she knows about it

>>35134287
>Does perusing this evidence on a lonely weekend make you a pedophile?

Unless you'd also want to watch videos of other 14 year olds having sex, probably not.

It seems your enjoyment from it comes from it being your own personal experience, rather than anybody being involved in it being underage.

That said, it's probably safer to delete it, the law is retarded and women can be vindictive.

>>35134531
They don't push out videos of killing people for people's entertainment, therefore watching the videos doesn't stop the killings. Not the same case with CP

>>35134428
Oh wtf yeah I don't see any problems as long as you keep files offline.

>>35134726
they do it to scare the shit out of people (i.e. terrorism) and by watching it or sharing it you're letting their message spread. furthermore, most cp is made for the maker's personal use, which is then traded with other makers for exclusive self-made content. meaning, if you're not making it yourself and trading with them, or paying them for it you're not encouraging them.

Again I'd just like to reiterate that this is hypothetical. No backtracing FBI pls

Only came to mind because we have an underage apprentice/intern in work who says he has a lot of that kind of stuff from past relationships, and it's his 18th soon.

>>35134876
he's fucked, regardless of his age. they've prosecuted literal underages for this shit before.

As much as jacking it to the memory would be, basically not at all.

>>35134531
on the other hand you can go on wikipedia right now and look at the mutilated corpse of a 15-year-old sandnigger that our brave men overseas raped and then murdered (as opposed to the one in abu ghirab that was merely raped and then maybe murdered)

lol

>>35134917
Yeah, I get that it is technically very illegal. But morally? I don't think I see anything wrong with it.

>>35134718
I think this is it. Because you've experienced it yourself part of it is in your memory anyway. Not the same as perving on other underage girls for your own enjoyment.

Fucking reported you pedophile piece of shit, enjoy your last day or so of being a free man

>>35134287
9 year old arrested in 2014 for having naked pictures of himself. You should give it a last wank then erase it.

File: thanks-for-the-tip.jpg (116KB, 1987x611px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1987x611px

>>35134287
Thank you for your irrefutable articulation of the premise that you are in possession of what would be considered illegal, and illicit, material, which will undoubtedly earn you a one way ticket to prison, you pedophile! RIP.

>>35134287

being a pedo means being attracted to kids who are pre-pubescent so no

however it is legally considered child porn since normies are insane

File: nigger.png (81KB, 1192x333px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1192x333px

>>35135019
>reddit
needs more blacked.com

File: facepalms.jpg (72KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 720x960px

>>35135019
>irrefutable

Good one.

Incidentally, here is a 14 year old girl's reaction to your post.