How Picky Are You, /r9k/?

>untick "In a relationship"

Holy shit.

File: Screenshot_20170226-063900.png (109KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1080x1920px

Crying shame I dont live in the US. Theres apparently 1 million women who fit my taste!

File: singleaf.png (22KB, 807x526px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 807x526px

Yeah... I honestly don't know why wanting a women with a post-grad degree is this difficult.

>>35125594
Why would you want a woman with a degree?

I want someone who is outspoken, shy, or generally anti-social or acts like a robot so I can assert my dominance and manipulate them into doing things.

File: broken.png (80KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1920x1080px

>>35125041
Err, I think the age selector is broken on that site

>>35125041
The only things I didn't ask for:
>Not over 34 (I'm 25)
>Not conservative
>Not Overweight
>Not Obese
>No kids

Everything else, fine.
>1.3%

I refuse to believe that not wanting to date, as a 25 year old man in decent shape, a 54 year old, obese women with kids (likely my own age) makes me """""picky""""". Who the fuck make this shit?

>>35125632
Fuck. I'll do it for ya

>>35125447
We must have similar standards, I have 20,000 less than you.

I wonder how low the figure would be if I could filter out nonvirgins

File: hmmmm.png (6KB, 529x311px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 529x311px

I wonder where this polling was conducted

>>35125041
52,171
There are 52 with my stats in the US

File: 20-29-relative.png (130KB, 889x585px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 889x585px

>>35125710
The truth is often scarier than fiction.

>8,282
All the women in the US are apparently unhealthy weight/obese and in a relationship.

File: 2fdb5a0a322264fd48e863e7d9fa4681.png (12KB, 420x309px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 420x309px

I live in Europe though, so it's not like it really matters.

664,344

sucks living in the US and rarely being attracted to white or black women

File: wow.png (8KB, 262x213px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 262x213px

fuck hahagahaga

>>35125041

Total women in US
661

% of population
0.00020459578633224196%

I am calling bullshit.

>>35125041
>271 women in USA
fucking lol

Apparently there's only about 1.3 million women out there for me in the US. I wasn't even being picky outside of age and race too.

>Half of women 19-25 have kids

END ME

File: 1488046824584.png (49KB, 400x291px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 400x291px

>age 1-18 cant be selected

baka, racists

joke aside:


Total women in US
>1,112,457

>% of population
>0.3442780570977792%

I dont know if im picky or not.

File: 1487410569835.jpg (185KB, 550x821px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 550x821px

>>35125695
Actually that button is just disabled but it's super simple to fix the inline page javascript. Just uncomment change this line:
//document.getElementById("age1").checked = true;

And then in the HTML for the page you can switch off the "disabled" tag in that checkbox:
<input class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" id="age1" value="age1" disabled="disabled"> 1-18

Looks like from the raw data in their script that calculates the percentages of the population that the "1-18" category falls in at 24% of the female population of the United States (as compared with the 26% of the female population for the 35-54 age range).
Raw data from the script:
24% // 1-18
10% // 19-25
12% // 26-34
26% // 35-54
13% // 55-64
15% // 65+

I'm not entirely sure why they commented out the "1-18" section. I guess they don't want teenagers to know how many other teenagers there are out there for them to date?

>>35125758
again, think about where the polls were conducted and who participated

File: and none of them would want me.png (9KB, 369x252px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 369x252px

>>35125144
This. It's kinda funny honestly, made the available women drop pretty hard

File: JUST.png (40KB, 483x380px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 483x380px

>>35125041
>just want a conservative or moderate GF money, race, religion barely of ever matters
Of course a health weight and physical activity fucks me to shit because women don't take care of themselves.

>>35125041
>1-18 is not an option

I guess that's 0% for me then.

>>35125144
>untick "Overweight" and "Obese"

>>35125847
>ticked overweight and obese
Total women in US
1,869

3 times the initial result.

File: mmm001.jpg (202KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 550x413px

>>35125847
you must be really picky. Try lowering your standards.

>>35125923
Probably mostly census data.

Dude so funny XD

Total women in US
25,141

I'll, I'll be alright.... right??

>Total women in US: 309,533

File: Screenshot (2).png (84KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1366x768px

>untick has children/in a relationshit
>untick into polygamy
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


ALL WOMEN AREN'T ROASTIES AMIRITE

>>35126003
26-34 because I am 33 and I want +/- 1 year only
25k-50k income because I earn 45k a year
Bachelor's degree because I want the same intellectual level as me
White, self explanatory
Single / not in a relationship
close/monogamous relationship
Catholic
Conservative
Healthy weight
150 minutes moderate / 75 intense per week because that's what I do
heterosexual
height : no preference
cup size : no preference

I think this is really reasonable. By the way I am not american so in my country there should be 5 times less women like this.

>81,535
>0.02523331227648%

Atheism and fatness really brought me down.

why the fuck is "relationship status" a fucking option? what the fucking cuckshit is this?

>19-25
>Any income level
>At least high school education
>Asian, hispanic, white, or other (Some black girls are cute but they're like one in ten)
>Single
>Monogamous
>Catholic, Protestant, or Unaffiliated
>Anything but liberal
>Anything but obese
>Any activity level
>Heterosexual or bisexual
>Doesn't have children
>Any height
>Any cup size

Do I sound picky?

File: 1485657292064.jpg (73KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 768x768px

>>35126164
Why not just ask for the moon and stars while you're at it?

>Choose perfectly normal and reasonable choices
>1% of population

Fuck you and fuck your list. this is literaly "a normal healthy woman is an unrealistic standard" liberal shit.

>>35125041
>uncheck obese
Haha

File: 7196368.png (29KB, 300x162px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x162px

>>35126285
>Drops 11%

>There are nearly 350,000 obese women with AA-cup tits

>>35126229
It means if you're up for dating "taken" women and hoping they leave their boyfriends/husbands for you.

>>35126417
I'm not gonna lie...the though of that turns me on. Just imagining all those fat little piggies with flat chests makes me fucking diamonds.

File: img_0304_507.jpg (60KB, 407x637px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 407x637px

>bra size only goes up to an E

File: ff5feb522304a7ada3cc2dff27bbffc1.jpg (21KB, 325x450px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 325x450px

>AA cup
Is this even real?

>No place to check "virgin"
>The most important factor in a LTR
Confirmed normie test

Reminder that some "men" would choose >>35126506 over >>35126464

File: smug.gif (227KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 600x600px

>there are only ~100,000 straight, non-black, over 5'8, 19-25 aged, 5+ inch penis, non-muslim, high school + educated, single, normal weight men without children in the US

lmao, American men are garbage.

File: 1487837553859.png (1MB, 830x770px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 830x770px

>can't pick 1-18
fucking americucks

>>35126806
>tfw all of those except I'm not healthy weight or American

>>35126678
This. Why isn't there a question for "past sexual partners"?

File: image.jpg (10KB, 252x158px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 252x158px

Expected something like this, originally.

>>35126806
That's literally me... women still won't choose me

>>35126876
Because that isn't asked in the US census, duh.

File: 1486081082358.jpg (51KB, 512x575px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 512x575px

>uncheck "in a relationship"
>uncheck "obese"
Holy shit

File: 1473868890343.png (123KB, 275x425px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 275x425px

>leave religions ticked
>over 5 million

>leave only "unaffiliated" ticked
>drops to just over 1 million
When will people learn to stop believing in fairy tales?

>>35126911
But they ask about penis size?

File: kmp.png (12KB, 407x234px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 407x234px

>tfw
kill me now.

>>35125041
>AoC is 14 here in Germoney
>1-18 option cant be selected
into the trash this site goes

>>35127044
Fuck are your standards?

File: 1483194336834.jpg (65KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 728x546px

>checked myself
>117 men are exactly like me in the US

>>35126268
Are you me? We have exactly the same choices

File: feels bad.png (26KB, 355x244px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 355x244px

These men are
>white
>19-25
>making over $100,000
>atheists
>have big dicks
>very tall
>fit with a healthy weight

L I T E R A L L Y the most desirable men in the United States.

>>35127086
There were 3 exactly like me

>>35127044
Well, you better figure out who those five ladies are and what they like.

>>35127084
its bullshit. i just put in my own stats and it says 0. thats ridiculous.

File: 1.png (9KB, 357x235px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 357x235px

>>35125041
She's out there somewhere, robots...

>>35127130
these describe me (my dick isn't very big but its over 6.5 and I'm 6'3" and /fit/)

i dont think this site is very accurate at all because I can think of 1 or 2 people like me that fit that criteria as well

>>35127209
You don't make $100,000 a year at 19-25.

>>35127130
Hey look it's me.
375k passive and 120k active income.

>>35127130
I entered in my own stats and got zero. kek. I know a number of others like me too.

>>35127277
You do in NYC/SV finance or CS. Granted, that's not a lot of people.

>>35127167
>1 women equals 3.8% of the US population
You could've at least TRIED making it look more believable.

File: Screenshot_20170225-235533.png (74KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1080x1920px

>>35127331
I entered mine and got 1. They know. Shut it down.

File: file.png (17KB, 332x204px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 332x204px

>>35125041
>age
19-34
>income
25k or above
>level of education
=>bachelor's degree
>race
white/asian
relationship status:
single
>monogamous?
monogamous
>religion
atheist
>political ideology
any
>weight
<overweight
>activity
any as long as not overweight
>sexuality
gay/bi
>children
doesn't want any
>height
greater than 70 inches
>erect penis length
greater than 6 inches

Literally all of these requirements are below my qualities where applicable, I didn't think I was picky.

>>35127344
you're just pretending to be retarded, right?

>>35127355
>gay/bi
>doesn't want children
>greater than 6 inches
>greater than 70 inches
>atheist
>bachelor's degree.
These are very rare qualities in American men.

>>35127344
American education, everyone...
unoriginal comment

>>35127383
>>35127440
Sorry, I didn't see the negative exponentiation.

>>35127355
>greater than 70 inches
f-f-fuck you too.

File: 1470905725016.png (1MB, 788x872px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 788x872px

>>35125144
>the only requirement was that a women be between 19-34
>11.176%
>untick in a relationship
>4.917%

why do I bother

File: Capture.png (7KB, 343x266px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 343x266px

>>35125041
1 in 310 not bad odds compare to the rest of you

>>35127421
Gay man already puts it down to at most 3% of the population before you even start.

File: 1480126616982.jpg (40KB, 576x472px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 576x472px

>>35127487
>take Obese/Overweight off the list
>4.7% to 1.7%

wake me up

This website isn't even close to accurate.

I plugged in all my personal stats + AA through C cup breasts and it shows there are 5000 white women with no job in the US with similar stats. And thats clearly fucking wrong.

File: Unbenannt.png (9KB, 308x228px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 308x228px

>>35125041
One guy in the US is exactly like me.

Where are you, Burgerbro?

>>35127552
it's you, they know, RUN !!

File: 10568856_88632428475639303_184597836431510612129_n.jpg (105KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 960x960px

>tfw only 21,104 educated titcows in the US

File: 1479938763118.jpg (19KB, 326x309px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 326x309px

>>35127538
>enter own stats
>website says I don't exist by the time I get to height

I-if I enter my penis size, will I break the website?

File: 1487346807261.jpg (196KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1280x960px

>>35126758
I'm pretty sure I'd enjoy >>35126464 's
tits more than anybody but >>35126506 is still better marriage material

>>35125041
>not even 2% of the male population have dicks 6.3 inches or more

wtf I should be swimming in pussy

i too entered all my info and evidently i don't exist

why is it hard to believe that an obese postgraduate student with an average penis doesn't exist?

>>35127707
why do virgins think that having a bigger dick makes it easier to get women

seriously, just stop and think about it for 5 seconds

>>35125041
>0.16%
god damn, really?

File: Screenshot_2017-02-25-16-15-14.png (50KB, 480x854px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 480x854px

Oh wow, robots. I didn't see this coming...

I am one of 8 men with my qualifications?

This website is a meme that likely just multiplies percentages of the population without accounting for crossover of data whatsoever.

IE It counts people multiple times.

If someone has A tits, and is Underweight, it will remove them from the total twice.

File: AmericaBTFO.png (46KB, 1366x948px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1366x948px

>>35125710
>as many overweight American women as healthy and underweight American women
>this isn't even counting obese American women
just end us already.

>>35127762
I know, it's obviously pointless if nobody wants to see it in the first place.

>there's less than 1.5 million people that fit my criteria
>I was even being generous

File: fug.png (319KB, 425x450px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 425x450px

>click only women who don't want children
>goes from 9% to less than 0.5%

>>35125758
Try living in Northern Mining Towns where there can be upwards of 6-8 single men per single woman.

>>35127908
It's so weird, there are no places where women outnumber men like that.

>>35127802
They don't exactly hide this, just look at the javascript. They assume that in each segment there are equal distributions of all other segments.

The actual JS calculation looks like this:

obj.defaultPercent *
((raceValue == 0 ? 1 : raceValue)) *
((ageValue == 0 ? 1 : ageValue)) *
((incomeValue == 0 ? 1 : incomeValue)) *
(educationValue == 0 ? 1 : educationValue) *
(relationshipValue == 0 ? 1 : relationshipValue) *
(religionValue == 0 ? 1 : religionValue) *
(openValue == 0 ? 1 : openValue) *
(politicsValue == 0 ? 1 : politicsValue) *
((weightValue == 0 ? 1 : weightValue)) *
((exerciseValue == 0 ? 1 : exerciseValue)) *
((orientationValue == 0 ? 1 : orientationValue)) *
((childrenValue == 0 ? 1 : childrenValue)) *
((heightValue == 0 ? 1 : heightValue)) *
((breastValue))

>>35126279
Sometimes liberals are right.

Doesn't mean they should be.

>>35127962
Jasper, Alberta. During the summer they bring in shitloads of young people to work in the hotels and such, most of these are women. I don't think it's that severe, but I remember reading that there were still multiple young women per man.

File: 1487861389670.jpg (125KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 600x600px

>>35126806
>tfw not garbage man

>64,000 or 0.01%

crying pepe face

File: Capture.png (9KB, 320x227px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 320x227px

>select all the traits that I have
>get this

I want to meet you other me

File: results.png (8KB, 352x227px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 352x227px

>>35128126
I got 39. It literally dropped to a third after checking single.

File: l.jpg (26KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x450px

>>35128126
Here I am, brother from another mother.

>>35126202
I know those feels. Add in a post grad education for depressing results.

File: Screenshot_20170225-143838.png (202KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1440x2560px

There is no fucking way

>>35127838
Scary. The US is fucked.

File: 1482729737311.jpg (27KB, 301x280px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 301x280px

>>35126806
Literally just being black is keeping me down.

According to this test there is exactly one person in America like me.

>>35126758
>nonwhite fatty vs healthy white girl

yeah big surprise

>>35128234
athiest and not wanting kids killed me

File: 1461484994773.png (10KB, 309x219px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 309x219px

only things I unticked were ages, in a relationship, open relationship, gay, obese and already have children

>Total women in US, 1,501
>% of population, 0.00046482493209901046%

JUST

File: .png (20KB, 356x214px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 356x214px

I guess i was meant for that girl only.

File: good.png (11KB, 542x276px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 542x276px

I just want a woman who will be sweet to me and bare my children, and then will raise them with me so that they are strong. I would prefer if she was a conservative cutie of a one of the oppressor races aka middle eastern or white or semetic

>>35125041
wew

1.5%

i wanted someone who was single, straight, over 18 and under 35, not obese and who didn't already have children

race, politics, earnings, education, height, cup size, i don't give a fuck

i mean 1.5% is still like five million odd women, but damn it must be hard out here for amerifags who are genuinely picky

>>35128622
>not obese
>usa
you've done goofing.

File: bros.jpg (70KB, 1362x896px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1362x896px

>put my own info
>reach the last question
>172
>after answer:
>8

Is murrica full of dicklets?

Also where are my 8 bros?

File: .png (20KB, 387x230px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 387x230px

Decided to enter my stats... I do not exist

File: 1486428239281.jpg (821KB, 2200x2800px) Image search: [Google]

821KB, 2200x2800px

Total women in US
823


% of population
0.00025477628778698355%

i didnt even care about weight

File: IMG_20170226_100806.jpg (21KB, 391x273px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 391x273px

And I live in Australia, where our population is one twentieth of yours to start with.

>>35127971

Yeah this is stupid. Many of the people with 'good traits' tend to have a lot of the other good traits.

i.e. being at a healthy weight is correlated with higher income, better education, etc..

bad statistics all around in this stupid game

>>35125912
>16 is legal in my state yet i cant pick it
fug

File: 1487665734961.jpg (50KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 400x388px

>>35125041
>untick 'obese'
>potential partners drops from 5 million to 3 million
I hate this fucking country so goddamn much

Total women in US
150,781


% of population
0.04666330849702412%

Top kek

I just looked at the male side and put my own stats in to see what number of me it would say there are. 0. So, this site isn't even vaguely accurate.

File: fhfdh.jpg (19KB, 415x240px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 415x240px

>>35125041
im picky and proud of it

File: 1485984494369.png (6KB, 634x513px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 634x513px

>>35127552
>Unbenannt.png
>german default filename
>burgerbro

what did he mean by this

>>35125632
Yeah, I feel you, I also wish I could own slaves and treat them right.