What do you think the inevitable nonexistence after death is

>>35038885
>gonna be like

That's where you're wrong. There is no being like. Why don't you try actually reading the quote you attached?

File: 1423295211516.jpg (45KB, 409x409px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 409x409px

>>35038885

that picture is comforting as hell

the pain will at death, lads

>>35038885
>>35038938
>>35039019

https://practicallawandjustice.liberty.me/why-eternal-recurrence-is-inevitable/

Sorry.

File: Bogdanoff.jpg (49KB, 500x387px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x387px

>>35038885
Nonexistence is still existence, Einstein.

death is everything your brain isn't capable of imagining

>>35039077
>Existence has no boundary so it is clearly impossible for it to have an external environment.

Says who? Who's to say energy isn't being lost outside the boundary of what currently exists?

>>35039111
You'd think with a head that size he'd at least get the 6s Plus.

You fuck heads are totally misinterpreting Epictetus. Fuck off. Quit abusing stoicism for your autism.

>>35039215

What is it being lost to, if there is nothing there?

>>35039077

how do you know the consciousness will be the same? From where do you draw the conclusion that I am the same consciousness reliving the suffering of my existence? The universe can rearrange in a way that it is similar to what I am now experiencing, but can you know that "I" will be the same?

>being afraid of death
>fearing literally nothing

>>35039301
All I'm saying is this article is rather overconfident in its writing. It even seems to contradict itself when explaining how entropy only applies to a "bounded system with an external environment" and the goes on to say "there must be a limit to that which is inherently bounded" when explaining eternal recurrence. How could something be eternal when entropy is present in bounded environments?

>>35039553
I'd also like to add that the very nature of something being bounded is that there must be something for it to be bound to i.e. an external environment.

>>35039253
Epicurus isn't epictitties you silly faggot. And Epicurus was epicurean not stoic, epictitties was a stoic

>>35039019
>the pain will at death