Human Benchmark

File: Benchmark.png (48KB, 774x841px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 774x841px

Reminder to include a full screenshot to prove you're not a shitter that retries.

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-18 at 1.32.30 AM.png (79KB, 769x560px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 769x560px

>>34952373

i hate this whole mute thing

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-18 at 1.34.04 AM.png (72KB, 780x494px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 780x494px

>>34952728

sdgfdfasf fdsfds

File: humanbenchmark_18_02_17.png (21KB, 742x314px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 742x314px

>tfw you're barely a human

File: Untitled.png (57KB, 756x663px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 756x663px

>>34952373
I guess I have to type because I was muted for my comment being too low in content.

File: autismpowers.png (33KB, 772x654px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 772x654px

>>34952373
AUTISM POWERS ACTIVATE

>>34953072
>reaction time

hey there old timer!

>>34953086
heh funny joke anon, atleast i aint this guy though
>>34952859
sorry to use you as an example

File: me.png (31KB, 791x347px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 791x347px

>tfw borderline retarded
who else /sub100/ iq here? im at 87

Why do I suck at spatial memory and reaction time?

File: yepyepyep.png (55KB, 751x740px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 751x740px

>>34952544
im unironically still a virgin anon. wat do?

>>34953537
hmmm i used to play chess alot, i dont know if that might help. i also used to play battleships.

and i used to do puzzles like this and on braintrainer games, so i got alright at them.

for numbers though, i used to memorize phone numbers.

File: firefox _ 0218 _ 015301.jpg (27KB, 718x296px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 718x296px

>>34953388
fellow borderline retard here. we're in this together

>>34953808
im a pajeet btw, just letting you guys know :)

superpower by 2020

File: human.png (62KB, 756x798px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 756x798px

my reactions would probably be a bit better if i wasnt tired.
am i really that better than most people? I could have kept going on the number memory but i made a typo on the final digit.

Can't screenshot now.
>50th percentile numbers
>20th percentile reaction time (wtf?)
>90th percentile verbal memory
>18th percentie spatial memory (wtf?)

>>34954047
same here on the numbers one anon, i remember putting a 99 when it was just a 9. meh, i'd say aslong as you're in the 90s on that one you're solid.

reaction time for me was 228 ms, but i did just drink coffee. since its 8 am where i am rn.

you got contact btw?

File: benchmark.png (23KB, 868x408px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 868x408px

>that visual memory

well shit im basically retarded.
but no news there

File: hbm.png (30KB, 906x372px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 906x372px

>>34952373
Meh, I'm drunk.

Visual memory seriously fucked me over.

subliminal messaging

File: 2017-02-18_00-44-24.png (48KB, 653x712px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 653x712px

non-autistic INTJ Philosophy major.
I could have gotten up to 11 digits at most; verbal memory could have been way better, and visual memory slightly better.

File: screencapture-humanbenchmark-dashboard-1487408236247.png (94KB, 762x1184px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 762x1184px

Not bad, I guess

originale

File: pleb.png (51KB, 754x817px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 754x817px

I did this while stoned as fuck, so not surprised that my memory is terrible, lmao

File: Witness me.png (53KB, 737x776px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 737x776px

%%MEDIOCRE%%
%%0r1g1n4|%%

Here, let me make an intelligence test for you.
You answer right. Your IQ is super high and you are just the really smart and intelligent, but lazy type. Get it wrong and you are a dumb normie who likes nigger diarrhea.
Question:
>BRAAP?

>>34955152
*unzips*
Nigger diarrhea is unoriginal content.

File: Untitled.png (23KB, 738x291px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 738x291px

>>34952373
brainlet intensifies

File: hi.png (20KB, 655x530px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 655x530px

>>34952373
you guys are like babies

File: brainman.png (154KB, 1936x1066px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1936x1066px

>>34952373
shitty reactions hold be back in vidya

>>34953388
>>34953846
fellow brainlet here

File: Scores.png (17KB, 683x218px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 683x218px

Didn't retry, screenshotted a month ago and cba to retake them all.
My verbal compared to visual memory tho...

>>34953537
same anon
what's up with that.

>tfw mentally deficient

I guess this explains why i'm so terrible at videogames.

It's almost 4:00 AM and i'm really tired though, I guess that's my excuse.

File: benchmark'd.png (36KB, 553x553px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 553x553px

>>34955379
I even forgot pic lol

[original(tm)]

File: r9k.png (56KB, 815x785px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 815x785px

shit reaction time lads

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-18 at 5.17.42 AM.png (63KB, 781x532px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 781x532px

>>34952373
>tfw shitty trackpad and no mouse
Disregard reaction time

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-18 at 9.54.13 pm.png (121KB, 1536x658px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1536x658px

lmao why tf is my verbal memory one so good. I sucked at english at school and was always good at maths

i don't get this

File: Screenshot_2017-02-18_02-53-46.png (68KB, 544x839px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 544x839px

Some of you guys took some real shitty screenshots. I know you've taken the test multiple times to get those scores.

Cheating at something so unimportant and stupid. SHAME.

I would've done better with the reaction times if I weren't drinking.

>>34956149
>Cheating at something so unimportant and stupid. SHAME.
Do not forget to run this shit over and over until perfection, clear cookies and achieve all on 100% as 'newcomer' :^)

File: bvfxdbjhcn.png (23KB, 781x310px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 781x310px

this was my first go round at it, how the fuck did I beat almost every other cunt at visual memory?

File: score.png (51KB, 953x712px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 953x712px

I'm blaming my bad reaction time on shitty internet connection

File: Capture.png (61KB, 779x846px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 779x846px

did number memory a few times because I thought I would be good at it but apparantly not

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-18 at 9.58.48 pm.png (204KB, 1183x1396px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1183x1396px

I'm a slow thinker. I feel like I think at the speed of speech and everyone else is faster.

For number memory I tried to chunk.

Reaction time makes me wonder whether I should quit playing games and become a creator instead.

Visual memory, yep I'm slow. The shame of iq115.

File: stats.png (58KB, 735x796px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 735x796px

all taken once

>tfw shit number memory

File: jhdtjdtbjdty.png (22KB, 778x307px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 778x307px

>>34956312
i did 'em all over again, sure enough pretty high visual score, and like >>34956320 said, shitty internet fucks your score, I have Australian third world tier interwebs, unless (more likely) I'm just a slow reaction time fuckwit

File: brain.png (58KB, 857x678px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 857x678px

Is there a strong penalty in the visual memory if you pick some of the wrong tiles on each new set?

File: asfasf.jpg (35KB, 743x290px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 743x290px

>>34956149
This is legit first try, but I like doing puzzles and these types of games so I have small strategies set up to help me do better.

For number sequences try to find relations and then fill the blanks.

>923125856
I would see that 23 and 25 are close numbers separated by 1. 58 and 54 are decreasing by 2, then just slap a 9 at the beginning and it's easy to remember.

For the grid try to point out what the most simple squares are lit up (for example, single squares in the corners) and then click on the harder shapes while they're still fresh in your mind, retaining the simpler ones for after.

For words literally just blank your mind, wait for a while and then start, focusing on the test.

Through cookie scumming I could have gotten better.

File: IMG_20170218_193038_738.jpg (55KB, 1279x651px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1279x651px

>>34953388
I am a literal real life apustaja
I got an IQ around 80, forgot the exact number

File: human test.png (29KB, 837x558px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 837x558px

>>34952373
Meh, was expecting worse

File: ytho_.png (81KB, 594x887px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 594x887px

>>34952544
But how does this prove you didn't retry? You could delet cookies reset IP and all that jazz you know.

>sonic.png

File: 1487417843922[1].jpg (216KB, 957x1202px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 957x1202px

how are these even graded I don't get it

i imagine most of this board took these several times and is just posting the best results lmao

>>34956643
t. got shit results

File: d908e6e39e[1].png (34KB, 897x636px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 897x636px

>>34956643

woah wrong link i guess

>>34956149
>they didn't do as bad as me, THEY CHEATED
Look up narcissism and ponder.

>tests you can take notes for with no penalty
>combined with a test where you can just screenshot the screen

amazing intelligence test here

File: humanBenchmark18217.png (57KB, 929x843px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 929x843px

shit reaction time

impressed with my verbal desu

File: 2017-02-18_14-48-04.png (65KB, 1919x928px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1919x928px

So I guess I kinda have to lose now?

>>34956688
yeah they're not exactly using it to allocate your job for life or anything guy

if you wanna cheat then go ahead but why would you?
you're either lying to yourself of to us
I'm not sure which is more pathetic

>>34956702

you're supposed to take the test seriously anon

How is this supposed to measure intelligence again?

It says right there on the sites you can use techniques to improve your scores.

File: im majoring in theatre.png (69KB, 765x845px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 765x845px

>tfw i could've done better but keep getting distracted by absolutely nothing

also, feels gud, my reaction time has improved by 100ms since last year. must be all this r6 i've been playing

>>34956762

are you implying intelligence cannot be improved by exercising ?

File: me.png (59KB, 733x895px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 733x895px

Did I do well, lads? No tricks or cheats or pnemonics or anything.

>>34952373
>reaction time
>intelligence

Nice fucking meme, I guess you are automatically smarter when you are 16 years old because your are at peak reaction time physiologically

>>34956811
I am implying that this isn't a good test for intelligence. It is only about memorization. Some autistic savant could probably memorize a 100 numbers or more. Wouldn't mean that this person is what we mean with intelligent. I think it is more accurate to say that memorization is a component of intelligence, but I do not think it is the most important one.

>>34956842

memory is also affected by age, whats your point

File: Capture.png (57KB, 794x805px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 794x805px

>tfw literally retarded

>>34956717
The point is the percentiles get fucked up.

For instance if you get 6 numbers, which is pretty much 50th percentile of the normal population, you wont get 50th percentile here because people are cheating.

File: 2017-02-18_15-01-56.png (58KB, 783x772px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 783x772px

Get away from me fucking subhumans REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>34956811
Oh look the propaganda! How fun! Friendly reminder that behaviors associated with success may be because you were going to be successfull to begin with and are not a product of your diet, exercise, etc, and were acting wise because you were one to behave so well to begin with and your behaviors are a product of your true nature to follow good directions and exelling to begin with!!


Or in other words, if there's people that are shit maybe they do shit things because that's what they are! Shit people, because statistics can be taken more than one way!!

XDDDDDDDDD

Also, if something is shown to kill 50 percent of all smokers early after long term smoking, aint a coin toss used to simulate random chance? XDDD

Statistics yaaay YAAAAYY

>>34956876

That clicking fast is not by any measure a part of "intelligence".

t. someone who literally administers real intelligence tests for use in court.

File: screenshot-www.humanbenchmark.com-2017-02-18-13-02-32.png (36KB, 782x656px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 782x656px

I'm starting to think I might be retarded.

>>34956911

is that what you tell yourself
look for help

>>34952373
>tfw cant get high reaction time score because I only have a shitty mousepad

>>34956929
You are what you are. There's no help available. They'll bullshit themselves and you if you are dumb enough to ask.