Identifying fellow robots/cyborgs

File: 73fd3fabdf3cbdf41a4bb6fab88625d99ac65536.jpg (322KB, 870x970px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 870x970px

It's impossible to identify a cyborg since it's all about hiding your powerlevel.

You're never going to find a fellow cyborg, only normalfags to do smalltalk with.

Me:

>Good handwriting because of my major
>Doesn't bite nails, but may occasionally pick nose and eat boogers right in public
>Don't know what poorly tied means
>I have no evidence whatsoever that I'm smart
>Best shape out of my family, but horrible health problems
>Leaning more towards skeleton, but I'm middleweight
>Don't give a fuck about risks anymore, life is meaningless
>My only political views are that I hate feminists (feminazis, as I outright call them)
>Use beauty products excessively but to no success with losing virginity
>Weeb
>Dislikes cats because they just run away from me
>Drinks heavily and uses excessive drugs as a means of escapism

>>34917507
Why spend money on hair gel.
Just don't wash you're hair with shampoo.
You get the same effect.

>>34917859
This
True robots use hair grease to get it to stay out of our eyes

>>34917507
>robot
>doesn't drink
wuut

>>34917728
Fuck. This is true isnt it. Help

>>34917728
You can still notice some cues. Horrible handwriting, poorly tied shoes (bad fine motor skills), and high intelligence are caused by high functioning autism and very hard to hide.

Who the fuck even checks if your shoes are well tied

File: 1487281214849.gif (4KB, 240x160px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 240x160px

>>34918330
That's the entire point. It's an easy way to find them, since most normies don't recognize the way robots tie their shoes and as such they don't need to hide it.

>>34917507
You got me on these
>horrible handwriting
>very bad shape
>obese or skeleton
>extremist or no political views
>doesn't use hair gel/skin care products
>likes cats
>doesn't drink

But i have one more to add

>Bad posture

>>34917507
>>34917931
That should probably be either doesn't drink at all and actively condemns people who do or complete alcoholic. No middle ground.

>>34918172
>you can still notice some cues
I doubt you're able to safely identify anyone with those cues.
Those can be flaws of both sides and anecdotal evidence is worth shit.