Could a meteor strike causing a apocalypse like situation by killing 75 percent of the human race be our luck ?
>>34774003
Would be nice, but unlikely. At the rate we're going we might see the oil supplies run out though, which would be an apocalypse on its own and probably have a similar death toll.
>>34774003
It'd be grand, so long as I survived and got to take part in the rebuilding.
>>34774084
>he believes in the peak oil meme
>>34774111
Widow everywhere
>>34774116
>Wanting the world to stay as it is and not see everyone starve
What kind of normie are you anon?
>>34774111
what would your roll be?
you think chads going to let you breed? or do you think chads going to form a community with his chad pals and have 10-20 females each
>>34774153
I wouldn't mind an apocalyptic happening, I'm just saying we won't run out of oil (at least not in our lifetime)
>>34774154
I'm pretty much just a failed normie with some added asociality. I'd have no problems at it were I forced to it.
>>34774154
Who says Chad doesn't want some effeminate boipussy now and then. In a post apocalypse even Chad will have to settle with what he can get.
>>34774250
Why not just shoot Chad?
>>34774302
Chads will manage to have guns always in their hands
btw the most deadly thing about a big meteorite impact isn't the shockwave or the flash or anything like that, but ejecta that was catapulted into a low orbit and re-enters the atmosphere.
It's thought that the tiny fragments and particulates that re-entered the atmosphere burned up (due to friction) and that flooded the entire earth's surface with infrared heat radiation.
If you take a look at the meteorite impact that killed off the non-avian dinosaurs 66 million years ago, there is a world-wide, isotopically homogenous layer of carbon soot. This (as well as the sudden abundance of fungal spores in the fossil record) is usually interpreted as the burning of the entire terrestrial biosphere in a single event. You can actually find scientific papers which describe the first hours after the impact as a "world without shadows".
>>34774302
Because then there's no Chadcock to ride and pound against your fem-prostate.
>>34774154
>implying I wouldn't shoot chads who threaten me on site
The Apocalypse would be fun because there would be no more laws and regulations and perhaps we'd go back to using swords and sticks when doing battle with each other.
>>34774459
yeah but what if i live
>>34774434
A gun in Chad's hand won't help him.
>>34774512
Chad's won't let his boipussy untied
There is going to be a comet passing by tonight, should be visible along with the eclipse.
>>34774624
>getting tied in the first place when I've guns
>>34774692
tfw when you just have an old k98
>>34774942
It's a start. Just can't get into a firefight with it.
>>34774956
I don't even have bullets yet I could tape a long knive on it
>>34775146
Cartridges, not bullets and I suppose you could use it to spook someone, but that's not exactly preferable when SHTF.
>>34775201
Depend of the place you live, it would be a bad idea for me, there's hunters
No, because you're still a sperg and I really don't see why you would unroot yourself from the basement because there's less people outside when the root of your problem is an inability to deal with the fear of the outside world.
>>34775343
Hunters are better than prepper reservists.