Are looks more important than common interests nowadays?

>>34756870
To women? Yes.

To men? No because all women are into the same shit.

>>34756870
They always were more important, looks always come first. it's just human nature.

Assuming by common interests you mean financial and shit, then yeah because women make enough money for themselves as is. If you mean things like hobbies then that never mattered.

Common interests don't even matter, it's more like compatible personalities.

But yeah.

File: 1481138248290.jpg (69KB, 611x548px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 611x548px

>>34756911
>>34756960
>>34756901
I always thought if people where interested in the same things it would be easier to start a relationship. Man was I wrong.

File: Feels.png (30KB, 500x461px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x461px

>>34757126
>Man was I wrong.
Yup.

>>34757126
If you're interested in the same things as a woman, you aren't her boyfriend, you're her gay friend.

>>34757126
It's not really more than a talking point. I'm not going to meme and say it's not beneficial at all, but it's never been the primary reason people got together.