Science

i'm so interested in the swiping habits of normies

File: 1486090516668.png (7KB, 333x359px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 333x359px

>>34753796
Fucking patriarchy ruining everything

>>34753796
>trust me bois its a legit sauce
>dailymail
kill yourself shill.

Your point?

I have like 20 matches but never messaged any, im too autistic to chat even if theyre not a bot

As such i just use tinder to try and take place of lack of self-appreciation by tryna match girls

>>34753796
I wonder what those poor fags who never get a match have to say about this shit.

>>34753796
Not going to lie I've done this before, but I'm sure women do it to.

Don't all guys just swipe right for everyone and then go about sorting the wheat from the chaff afterwards.

File: 1479549332950.jpg (15KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 224x225px

This is bullshit. I try talking to all of them and none of them reply. It's like they replaced the word "men" with "women"

>>34753796
That disparity in the number of responses
Daily mail is fucking tabloid shit

>>34753796
>Tinder
Who cares women are disgusting anyway

>>34753906
that only works because women are too proud to match everyone, so you get more accurate matches by just swiping right on everyone

>>34753796
If you're male and you message a dumb bitch first, you're instantly branded as a creep unless you're young Leonardo DiCaprio.

I use Tinder to try and help figure out how good I look after losing a ton of weight. I assume I'm a few points under the top half of the girls that swipe right on me.

>>34753796
>dailymail.co.uk
clickbait rag news

>>34753796
I like how it talks about the 7% vs 21% sending a message instead of 8248 male matches versus 532 female matches. Women get 577 messages for 112 sent, but they're the ones getting the short end of the stick apparently.

Comments are brilliant
So redpilled

File: Humanitarian-of-Tinder-713x1024[1].jpg (138KB, 713x1024px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 713x1024px

>>34753796
>Try Tinder
>Use it as intended
>Whole thing costs a lot of time
>Get very few matches
>Get replies to conversations that ooze disinterest or don't get replies at all
>Fuck this shit, might as well just like everybody and see where the coins drop
>Get more matches that result in actual dates right away
Women fucking ruined Tinder themselves with their stuck-up cunt attitudes. Not that it really matters anyway because most chicks on there are trash judging by their pictures
>Tonnes of nose rings and tattoos
>Completely unoriginal holiday photos ("Look! I am holding back the tower of Pisa ^_^" )
>"I am a foodie and I love traveling"
>"I am weird/a geek"
>Photos of them doing """charity work""" in some African village with some kids
>Color run photos
>Selfies with the holocaust memorial in Berlin

>>34754313
Wtf why is she scantily clad in a bikini in some African village?

That's the vainest attempt at self promotion I've ever seen

>>34754313
I'd love to see her get banged by those horny kiddos like the little slut she is.

>>34753796
AHAHAHA HOLY KEK SHIT MY PEPPERONI SIDES

>>34753796

They're probably talking about fake accounts

File: IMG_6901.jpg (688KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 1920x1280px

Dailymail is pretty much openly fake news.

it's unlike other fake news sources though because it has no consistent agenda.

Activist post is always against conservatives, Breitbart is against liberals, Infowars is against any us government that isn't trump,

Daily mail on the other hand, seems to lie for no apparent reason

>>34753796
P SURE WOMEN DO THIS TOO

WIKIPEDIA BANS DAILY MAIL
UNCREDIBLE SOURCE

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website

>>34754880
Read this
>>34754806

I got muted because I'm an unoriginal faggot

>>34754806
Just the fact that you know the Dailymail exists is proof that they're drawing loads of attention and ad revenue from writing garbage and disinformation.

Daily mail is absolute cancer

>>34753796
>daily mail has a science section
lol

>>34753796

My two (and only) best friends are chads (one is a TURBO chad) and they swipe right on everyone

I wouldn't be surprised if this si true.

what is swiging right?

>>34755106
I think it means saying yes to a date

>>34755106
swiping right means you have "liked" them. If they see your profile and swipe right too than you both will get a notification that you have matched together

>>34753796
No way this is true. I have 141 matches and more than half of them have never answered back. I only refrained from messaging ~10.

>>34753796
Women are entitled to you talking to them on tinder now. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH MY SIDES!!!

>>34753796
Daily Mail always has the most based comment section though.

>>34753796
Tinder is fucking useless trash, it doesn't work

>>34753796
Please for the love of God, find some dignity and stop using tinder

>>34753796
This wont end well. Women will simply distrust men even more and it will strain an already fragile relationship. Robots are the ones who will suffer.

File: 1465732263239.png (15KB, 416x304px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 416x304px

>>34757480
This to be quite honest with you famalam

File: 1485182980183.jpg (37KB, 466x396px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 466x396px

>>34753796
>daily mail
fuck off

File: TINDER STUDY.png (317KB, 730x1789px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 730x1789px

>>34753796

Women are only caring about chad

This article is bullshit

File: 1.jpg (131KB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 852x480px

JESUS CHRIST is the only way towards FREEDOM OF TRUTH

YOU ARE ALL BEING DECEIVED BY IGNORANT SOCIETY

File: 1436567258501.jpg (29KB, 640x519px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x519px

>>34754107
>>34753796
>not from a satire site
>from daily mail

Something just doesnt add up, OP

>>34757950
fuqqq most women are so trashy

>>34757950
why continue life once you know this

>>34758236

I DON'T KNOW

IT PISSES ME OFF ANON IT MAKES ME SO FUCKING ANGRY

Curse of knowledge faggot, about to make a thread on it

>>34757950
>Anonymous
>Looks like some shitty blog
>"I'm a legit sexologist lol"

Dropped.

>>34753796
>be me
>be very shy
>no matches
>start swiping right even 5/10 girls
>get a match
>talk to her
>she immediately deletes me
>never talk to matches again

>>34757950
>Sexology student

Living meme tbqh

>>34753796
But it's true. I only use tinder when drunk, rarely get matches but it feels good when I get them. Never had an intention to actually do anything about it, and when I do it's just spamming some edgy gif or pickup line to dozens at a time like once a year.

>>34757950
um.. not the greatest source "anonymous". anyone know if this is legit? :/

>>34753796
>women get 16 times as many right swipes on tinder
>feminists still find a way to complain

>>34757950
>Sexologist
The irony here is that there could really be a market potential to figure things out about why what turns people on and how it effects relationships and stuff.

>>34758758
this
>>34757950
gonna try to figure out where the fuck this info came from

>>34753796
>is not from a satire site like the onion
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk
Chuckle level: hearty

>>34754313
>Selfies with the holocaust memorial in Berlin
perfect conversation opener tho
"did you know the holocaust is a hoe-axe?"

>>34753796
This doesn't disprove anything. It just shows that women will actually go through effort for a high value mate, and men are realizing that it's a numbers game.

Women go for quality, men go for quantity.

>>34760256
This. There is no reason to put in effort as a man because you often have a high chance to be ignored or have a cold reply back. So men just take the shotgun, spray some buck shot, and then hope something hits. Why put the effort in a good message if you have a high chance in getting rejected? It only makes sense to put in the effort to message as many women as possible.

Though I wouldn't trust any woman to be down with going out with you or fucking if you are just some normal guy and you are contacting them from some social profile site.

>>34754342
Kek. Vacationing in Africa.

>>34753796
fuck is daily mail not satire now

>>34753796
kek

this is me

>>34754342
virtue signaling has gotten abstract since it became okay to be a slag

>>34754806
>Daily mail on the other hand, seems to lie for no apparent reason
The best reason of all, money. And to be honest "credible" news sources are a pile of shit nowadays anyway.

File: 1440266192633.jpg (15KB, 545x555px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 545x555px

Fuck tinder. I am PRETTY SURE women do the same shit to me. The only matches I get are from fat girls and niggers. Fuck my life

>>34754342
In defense, the local woman are likely topless.

>>34753913
The thing is that their reasoning is flawed.

Men swipe right on every girl because he wants that one who will not deny him the pussy.

Women know that if they wanted to just have sex, pretty much any man would take her on that, so they get to be more selective about their swiping.

If you're only swiping one or two guys, it's not that much of a problem to put more effort into it. If you're swiping a hundred gals, there's no way you can devote that much attention to each of them...