Wait, if women are having more sex than ever thanks to sexual

>>34690698
"Sexual liberation" is/was code for "Fucking Chad Without Impunity"

>>34690698
what does one have to do with the other?

maybe the sexual liberation made a larger percentage of males afraid of women more

>harem anime came true
>not for its fans

>>34690698
Instead of fucking 1 or 2 Chads, and then a couple normies, they're fucking 100s of Chads and nobody else. The number of Chad's hasn't changed though, they're just sharing more women now

Because the top 20% of men are fucking ALL OF THEM REPEATEDLY

File: Frojak.jpg (6KB, 208x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 208x250px

>>34690715
Sadly, this anon is correct.

Women are very shallow and specific in their tastes
They almost exclusively want one type of guy and set of features
We call this type of guy "Chad"

Almost every woman would be with this type of guy if they could, and most will fuck multiple guys like this
So that one guy gets all the sex that would be normally had between regular people

And no matter how much they would claim otherwise, even the most 'faithful' woman would leaver her man for a heartbeat for a shot at one night with a Chad

>>34690715
That's because for millions of years women couldn't do anything without some form of impunity placed on them

>>34690715

You mean with impunity. Not without.

File: joerogan.png (437KB, 584x387px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 584x387px

>>34690698

Cause of the internet

>>34690841
>That's because for millions of years women couldn't do anything without some form of impunity placed on them
Women couldn't do whatever the fuck they wanted and contract Cervical Cancer from Chad HPVcock? Oh those poor princesses

>>34690857
Ok /lit/

Because millennials are having less sex, generally more meaningful long-term relationships, and far fewer one night stands than ever before.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetwburns/2016/08/16/millennials-are-having-less-sex-than-other-gens-but-experts-say-its-probably-fine/#74c9eec148fe

I know chadposting is fun sometimes but you guys don't actually believe any of that garbage, do you?

>>34690841
no girl born today experienced those millions of years

File: lol_ricky_gervais.gif (859KB, 389x259px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 389x259px

>>34690915
>Because millennials are having less sex, generally more meaningful long-term relationships, and far fewer one night stands than ever before.
lol

>>34690916
every girl today still experience those millions of years. culture last longer than a human lifespan. the culture of male superiority over females still exist today and girls today have to experience the same things their female ancestors experience

>>34690996
>every girl today still experience those millions of years.
Prove it.

> the culture of male superiority over females still exist today and girls today have to experience the same things their female ancestors experience
Prove it.

>>34690986
heh, yeah, look at those hilarious facts and statistics. they're funny because they disprove all my bizarre biases and misconceptions that i formulated over shit-posting on an image-board!

>>34690986
>quick the reals are damaging my feels, better post a le hilarious reaction image that'll show him

I'm truly cut

>>34691025
>>34691039

I read it and there's no data showing millennial having "More meaningful long-term relationships". In fact, It's not even fucking stated at all, just hypothesized by some researcher.

Please fuck off

>>34691007
>prove it
the porn industry is great proof, it caters to men and it does it by degrading women

File: 1434235533860.jpg (437KB, 1508x1493px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1508x1493px

>>34691025
>>34691039
You can leave anytime, roastbeef.

>>34691110
do you actually think that there are women on here prowling 4chan looking for fat autistic virgins like yourself to debate or argue with? you're a complete failure who doesn't even get a second look from women and you genuinely believe women are scouring /r9k/ to debate you personally?

>>34690698
80/20
sometimes a few of the non 20 get lucky once in a blue moon

>>34691104
> In fact, It's not even fucking stated at all, just hypothesized by some researcher.

Sure you read it buddy?

> For the 2015 and 2016 studies, researchers analyzed polled data on adult sexual habits from the General Social Survey, a longstanding survey and opinion bank operated by NORC at the University of Chicago.

>Among other things, they found that persons born in the '80s and '90s (a.k.a. millennials) report having a couple fewer sex partners on average than those in the prior two generations, and that the millennial group's younger half is twice as likely to be sexually inactive in their first years of adulthood as Gen X-ers were. Researchers also noted a particular trend toward sexual inactivity among millennial and nascent Gen-Z women, and that 15 percent of the 20- to 24-year-old set has not had sex since coming of age, which is a 6 percent bump from early '90s rates.

There's no need to be upset that your beliefs don't match up with reality.

>>34691110
I'm a dude, I guess I just have the benefit of actually not being a shut-in autistic nerd lmao

>>34691195
Isn't the data just saying millennials are having less sex? This data does not show anything about people having more meaningful long term relationships, in fact there were other causes being shown as to why people are having less sex, such as work and careers, which I find to be far more believable, as a lot of young people nowadays are increasingly becoming more and more career oriented. 2nd, aren't opinion banks voluntary? Most depressed sperg virgins arent gonna bother with surveys of any sort, ignoring them entirely, skewing data.

>>34691195
>> For the 2015 and 2016 studies, researchers analyzed polled data
>polled data

Oh, the same "science" that said Hillary had 99.6% chance of winning?

Absolutely worthless

>>34691195
I always wonder, what do they mean by sexual partners?
As in relationships, or does it include casual sex?
I get a feeling that normies don't really count one night stands, so it would make sense they have less long term partners (since they're spending even more time fucking more strangers).

>>34691195
>Fewer sex partners ON AVERAGE

Exactly. The percentage of male virgins has increased, women under report their sexual partners, normies have less sex than their Chad counterparts.

Even though Chad has a massive amount of sex it makes sense to see the average dip a little.

>>34690996
>girls today have to experience the same things their female ancestors experience
Picking berries?

>>34691107
Your statement only proves that women are incapable of making their own decisions and should not be allowed to have freedom. If women choose to partake in a contract of sexual nature it is their responsibility. You can't have it both ways. Either they are slutty whores en masse or they are incapable of thinking for themselves. Your words, not mine.

File: 1463106391971.png (302KB, 506x502px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 506x502px

>>34691558
The implication I read was that a lower number of partners would imply more long term relationships, which is what the researcher suggested the data showed (in addition to other factors ie careers)

>>34691729
Actually no, not the same science as political pollings rely on previous voting histories when calculating an areas potential vote. The reason Trump won is because he flipped the rust belt with his protectionist leanings, in addition to low voter turnout for Hillary.

Michael Moore was calling this months before the election, does that mean he's an infallible source of information too?

>>34691926
>women under report their sexual partners
How convenient, also completely baseless and unsupported.

>normies have less sex than their Chad counterparts
wow attractive well-adjusted people have more sex, stop the presses.

My argument was that despite "sexual liberation" the current generation are having less sex than ever before, which doesn't really support red-pill theory ie cock-carousel and branch swinging.

>>34691815
Sexual partner is anyone you've ever had sex with, so it includes both relationships and casual encounters. And yes normies absolutely count one-night stands.

The evidence is suggesting that millennials just aren't having them at the rate of previous generations.