I have felt the bare legs of two naturally blonde women. They

File: ivana and donald trump wedding 1977.jpg (36KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 540x304px

I have felt the bare legs of two naturally blonde women. They both had smooth legs. Their legs felt oily and slippery, although I don't know if that was because of their natual skin oils or if they had applied external oil/body butter/lotion.

I have felt the bare legs of three brown-/dark-haired women. They all had stubble from shaving, which felt abrasive when moving against the grain. Their legs felt dry and "plain". I have also seen that a dark-haired German woman had hairy arms and thus I would imagine that her legs were hairy (note that a woman can have smooth arms with hairy legs).

From my limited experience, it would seem that naturally blonde women tend to have (naturally?) smooth legs, whereas brunettes tend to have significant leg hair growth.

I would like to find a woman that has either no leg hair or such inoffensive leg hair that her legs still feel nice to touch. I do seem to prefer blondes for other reasons (although ideally I would have both blondes and brunettes for the sake of variation), so if blondes are in fact more likely to have smooth legs then that would be another reason for me to prefer blondes.

If you have any insight (anecdotes or otherwise) into how common leg hair is on women and if it's true that blonde women have less leg hair, please share. Try to keep in mind that a lot of women dye/bleach their hair and it can sometimes be hard to tell if it's their natural hair color. Also, there are more thorough hair removal methods than shaving, and shaven legs can also feel smooth for a short while before the stubble grows out.