WE HAVE A RIGHT TO EXIST

Why do people just say "Right to" and then add whatever the fuck they want after that and believe it is objective truth?

>>34644008
you don't think being alive is a right?

>>34644008
meh, it's their right to

>>34644066
no such thing as an impersonal right. you don't have the right to live, per se, but you nobody else has the right to stop you from living.

>>34644194
orly? lololol

>>34644008
its an international human right for a human that is already alive to continue living

do you read the shit you write?

saging pol thread

>>34644008
positive law is just one source of right

>>34643930
Tell that to the people who want to kill everyone thanks to man-made climate change. Tell that to the sun that's gonna destroy the Earth a long time from now. There is no purpose so it doesn't matter what happens. The fact that everyone's lives are going to be wasted doesn't even bother me

>>34644194
>nobody else has the right to stop you from living.
I assume that's what the book in op is about

>>34643930
Define "right" and define "exist"

>>34644268
before you can define something, you must first define "define"

>>34644268
what do you mean "define"?

>>34643930

... and a right to pursue happiness, yes.

It just so happens that I don't have any obligation to do anything about it. They should stop being a crybaby and do something if it bothers them that much.

I don't know, they could write a book about it.

>>34644405
did you actually go full circle and realised what you were saying is retarded, yet still hit submit?

File: The-Thinker.png (274KB, 433x566px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 433x566px

>>34644268
>>34644277

Definition is an opinion which clearly determines the content, scope and reach of a concept.