What Makes a Robot?

>>34606024
1. To me, a robot is a male who, for one reason or another, is severely limited in his ability to appeal to the opposite sex and to the outside world at large. Robots typically cope with feelings of isolation, anger, frustration, or depression.
2. Several features are disqualifying. Prior romantic/sexual relationships or contact with females is obviously the biggest one. In most cases, having kissed a female is also disqualifying. Women cannot be robots. Males with large circles of friends (say more than 10) cannot be robots.
3. I do not believe the transition from robot to normie is reversible. Once a "robot" had engaged in behavior that demonstrates he is capable of normal social behavior, he is no longer a true robot. So robots can become normies but cannot go back down to robot status, barring serious illness or injury:
4. No. This board's unique identity would be diluted if those unable to wholly empathize with a robot's situation were permitted to post here. Any poster exhibiting "normie" behavior should promptly be told to leave, and threads about normie topics should be ignored.

>>34606024
1.A robot is someone who looks like a person but is unable function like a person. They are less than subhuman.
2.The inability to have emotional connection with another human. (this disqualifies women)
3.A normie has had an emotional connection, they are in no way a robot. That proves that they have worth.
4.Non-robots should be able to post here because I like to see what meaningless shit their ego can justify.

imo

>>34606083
>10 friends

Fuck off my board reeeee

>>34606024
To me the classic "robot" are those who are inept for a variety of reasons and actually have legitimate problems (mental illness, physical problems to name a few) as to why they are in the position they are in. Now however it seems that it's just a bunch of people fantasizing about girlfriends and that they are doomed to loneliness even though they just don't have the will or motivation to actually go out and get one despite being fine. I do however believe that it's almost exclusively male, as western society tends to put young women on a pedestal for literally them just having a vagina and they'd have be seriously fucked to be considered a robot.


Obviously the one feature that disqualifies someone from being a robot is social success. Lots of friends, extroverted, and other things basically destroy any potential for being a robot. IMO however that is limited mostly to social success, with there being exceptions to the rule such as people like Bill Gates and potentially Barron Trump (he's a tad too early to tell, but I'm certain that with a billionaire father who is also POTUS the odds of him being a robot are basically nonexistent). Basically, a big defining characteristic is social success, though that can also intertwine with a cyborg, someone who is basically a mix of robot and normie.


I'd say that a normie could possibly be one. A normie is one who follows the herd of society, so if they stopped that for whatever reason then they could in a way be a robot. Now it's basically a low tier insult towards anyone for literally any reason. This doesn't really happen though.


The board was technically made to be an off topic place of discussion that wouldn't turn into the pornographic cesspool that is /b/, but the board has (or had) a unique identity because of the whole robot idea. I'd say that while anyone can post here there should be some rules set in place to stop people from bringing in their petty shit here.


T. Cyborg

>>34606161
By that number I mean an intimate circle that mostly interacts with one another. Obviously having 10 random friends from different connections makes you a normie.

"Cyborgs" are just normalfags in denial.

>>34606217
I tend to agree with this.
t. OP

>>34606237
Except it is. Cyborgs can't even describe what makes them different from normalfags.
>I just don't feel like I belong
Isn't cutting it.