I only own 28 articles of clothing. 7 pairs of socks, 1 jacket,

>>34597754
Good. That is sensible.

>>34597754
That's 35 you fucking retard

>>34597839
ikr

>>34597845
No, that's 28. Pairs count as 1 article.

>>34597754
Why? What are the benefits?

>>34597862
One sock isn't half an article of clothing you dump

>>34597874
Glad you asked.
The biggest, most immediate benefit is laundry. It's a breeze. I don't have a washer or dryer in my apartment, but there is a shitty on-campus """laundromat""" I use. It's like 150 feet away. Super convenient. Anyway, I only need to take up two washing machines maximum (each charging $1.50 for a go) and when they're both done, I just throw everything into a single dryer for literally $1. Then folding my laundry takes max. 15 minutes and I'm out the door. Only spent $4 and maybe 90 minutes doing laundry. It's pretty nice.
Also, the lack of choice fatigue in the morning is really nice.

>>34597896
Yes, it literally is. When will you ever use only 1 sock?

>>34597939
>When will you ever use only 1 sock?
Yes, but that's beside the point. You can't have half an article.

>>34597973
I think you can have .5 articles of clothing. It's really a semantic argument. It depends on your linguistic sensibilities.

>>34597754
why do you own so many sets of clothes? It seems unneccessarry to me desu famalam

File: he's right you no.jpg (31KB, 536x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 536x400px

>>34597973
Listen to the man. >>34598009

>>34598017
I only do laundry every weekend and I refuse to wear anything twice without washing it.

>>34597939
Why would having more clothes mean more laundry cost? You wouldn't wear more clothes per day

>>34597754
are socks really enough when you go out or a stroll?