A man who can resist pussy, is no man at all.

>>34589392
>man who can resist pussy, is no man at all

What if it's a roastie?

File: 1478283106629.jpg (188KB, 1148x1494px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1148x1494px

>>34589413
We're not talking about the aesthetics of the pussy, just the pussy itself.

But yes, you make a fair point.

>>34589392
>falling for the vaginal jew
Come on mate

File: 1485922396247.jpg (107KB, 500x637px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x637px

>>34589471
This. Break the conditioning, robots.

File: 89abd0b523ad53b98317903d2556f8438a40c6762b59ecc95190328112b61099.jpg (44KB, 634x418px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 634x418px

A man who cannot resist pussy, is no man at all.

File: 1478214452391 (1).jpg (2MB, 2254x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2254x3000px

Because you see, a man is defined by their weakness and not their strength. Men can do all as long as they put their mind to it. They can accomplish great things, and create whatever they desire. The only thing that really defines them as men is their unquestionable weakness to pussy. Similar to how Superman is always known to be weak to Kryptonite. If a man is not phased or affected by the pussy, he is not a man, but an anomaly.

File: 1480142504152.jpg (430KB, 1067x1600px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1067x1600px

But these anomalies, or "anomalous " men, aren't men. Once they refuse the desire for pussy the drive for greatness stops. They no longer care to better themselves or humanity for the proliferation of humanity, but rather focus their efforts on themselves alone.

File: 1480459525311.jpg (845KB, 1982x2108px) Image search: [Google]

845KB, 1982x2108px

Pussy is the only driving force. It is men's weakness. Without it they would be reduced to the likes of the self-indulgent or self-absorbed.

File: 1480310143854.jpg (379KB, 1758x1228px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1758x1228px

For a man to do and make great things they require, they need, that thirst for pussy. Nothing has ever been accomplished in history that wasn't for that gain. Without it they are self-indulgent men who care about only one, that one being themselves.

>>34589392

Fine by me. I'd rather be branded a sissy and keep my money and freedom, thanks

>>34589392
does anyone have a higher res version of this image?

>>34589858
>literally being an involuntary egoist
nice spooks

>>34589392

are you beta because you're thirsty, or are you thirsty because you're beta?

File: 1480458785356.jpg (760KB, 1696x2634px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 1696x2634px

>>34589927
You are misunderstanding the message.

It is voluntary. Many men choose to be self-absorbed hedonists. There is nothing forcing you to be otherwise. That does not make you a real man though, for pussy is the only thing that defines men.

File: 1480202225298.jpg (521KB, 1920x2560px) Image search: [Google]

521KB, 1920x2560px

>>34589888
Don't you see. You have no freedom. All you have is your desire to please your self. You are governed by it. Controlled by it.

So watching porn is "not being able to resist", therefore, only asexuals could not be defined as men.

That's why I refer to myself as trans-feminine, faggot.

File: max-stirners-whack-a-spook-god-state-uma-wak-a-spoook-2675547.png (96KB, 500x483px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 500x483px

my own > pussy

>>34589392
Correct, he is a god.