Are robots a modern phenomenon or did they always exist Did

You have twice as many female ancestors as you have male ones.
Think about the implications of this and find the answer to your question on your own.

>>34549961
Yes, but there was no internet so they had even less exposure to the outside world.
I'd say Goebbels and Lovecraft both seemed to fit most definitions of robot

>>34549961

Yes they always existed. I actually work with a guy in his late 40s who still lives with his parents and always has done.

He never says much about his life so I don't know if watches TV or uses the internet for anything other than booking trains. I know that he loves trains and all his time off revolves around his mum and his trains.

>>34550031
What happens to disfunctional robots whose parents won't let them live with them anymore

>>34550130
turn homeless and die soon.

>>34550019
What are the implications of this anon

>>34550130
They die, bro. They go homeless and then they're too antisocial to beg for money so they starve and die.

>>34549961
>that feeling when this entire thread and its replies perfectly describe me


literally just bee urself

>>34549961
I remember some anon posting a quote from some ancient Greek philosopher (at least that's what I think the source was) about shy men, so it's been prevalent to some degree for, what seems, the entirety of human history.

File: notes.jpg (350KB, 1220x1141px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1220x1141px

>>34549961
They always existed in some form.

File: 1485292576841.jpg (114KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 640x640px

>>34550020
>>34550689
But is it possible that modern society is making robots more common than they used to be

It seems like many of us on here are very much a product of our environment

>>34550396
80% of women breed, only 40% of men breed

>>34550730
It's impossible to say. Is it the current state of society that is conducive to the proliferation of robots, or does it merely give the same number of robots (proportionate to the whole population, of course) the tools to express their languishing?

>>34550842
Do you have sources for this anon

>>34549961
they are purely a Western phenomenon
they literally think they have it so bad...
well, enjoy your days in the comfort of your home screaming bloody murder at all the "normal" people you think have it better than you
get back at me when you don't even have a roof over your head 24/7

>>34550996
u sure are stupid.

>>34550031
liking trains is the no1 autistic old people like.

>>34550842
how is it that the genes have not been eliminated. I hope one day there will be genetic engineering to produce women who are attracted to us or get rid of us entirely. Its not fun to exist when ur so undesired and alone :(

>>34549961
Modern, I believe.

Dostoyevesky in "Notes from Underground" that these type of fucked up people were symptoms of modern society.

File: 1485703181148.jpg (433KB, 1280x1122px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1280x1122px

>>34551185
>tfw inherently unloveable
>tfw the media drives it into your head since you were a kid that one day you'll find a special girl and fall in love
>tfw you realize it's never going to happen

>>34549961
They always existed.

My uncle is one. But he did move out. Moved out and lived alone all his life. Recently transitioned.

>>34550996

>what are hikkis?

Robots have always existed, they just didn't have the internet to circle jerk in until recently. You'd find old school robots in autistic hobbies like train spotting, chess clubs, stamp collecting, bird watching, computer clubs, remote controlled cars, model trains clubs... Anything classically sperg.

>>34550730
Nah. There's just more people IN FUCKING GENERAL around these days. So there are more robots, but there are also more extroverts and more stacies and more chads and more everything.

File: 1484385350128.jpg (21KB, 480x356px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x356px

>>34551319
If you have interest in something like that then you are not a robot. A nerd maybe, but not a robot.

A robot is an empty shell of a man with no passion or interest in anything.

>>34551393

A robot is just a loser. Stop trying to project yourself onto the label.

>>34551454
But you're wrong though. Stop using words so loosely like this. Eventually tge word will just lose all meaning.

A robot is a very specific type of loser, not just any loser.

File: 1344182006474.png (121KB, 250x418px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 250x418px

Multiple societies throughout history have allowed polyamory. Unsurprisingly, this led to many men to be without a wife. Chad is antiquity was marrying 3-4 wives at a time, leaving average/sub-average males to fight for potential mating prospects.

>>34551228
he was wrong then they arent the symptoms. the modern society lets them just exist. they wre always there but they didnt survive.

>>34551319
they actually have people to do that with and are infinitely more outgoing

>>34551056
back at you

I wish the male suicide rate was higher so those who didnt kill themselves had women. I wonder how many women/men ratio would have to be to ensure that everyone gets a woman. Chat can get his 4 and then everyone else can get 1. Maybe 2/1 ratio would work. I hope they make it so more women are born in the future so we can all be happy and have somoene to love

File: bruh.jpg (21KB, 560x516px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 560x516px

>>34551268
>tfw you aint even the main character in your own life.
>you just the shitty comic relief/hopeless side character

>>34549961
>Did previous generations have guys who lived with their parents all their lives
moving out is a modern thing actually

>>34551561
You're either clinically retarded or underage. 'Fuck outta here.

>>34550934
Just Google that shit, it isn't a secret.

>>34551612
whats wrong with having a society where men are in the minority? It happened in the 50's and it turned out ok relatively. At least there were more happy people with girlfriends.

>>34551488

No, it isn't. A robot has always been a social outcast and that covers a variety of different types of people. It isn't just the thing you identify with, snowflake.

File: 1482847910323.jpg (51KB, 400x323px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 400x323px

>>34550842
>>34551763
How fucking pathetic and disgusting does a woman have to be to not be able to breed

Even fat ugly women that look like literal trash will have desparate betas lusting after them

You'd actually have to try harder to NOT breed

>>34551837
t. normie who thinks he's "quirky" and "awkward" because he likes superhero movies

You're not a robot and never will be, Norman.

>>34551185
Female selection is what causes the sex differences. While society has convinced you that the females of our species are the pretty sex, it's the opposite.

If your mating strategy isn't similar to that of a bird, you're pretty fucked. Build up a nest, work on your appearance, work on your social status.

You ever wonder why women are basically clones of each other? Cuz they aren't the ones competing.

File: 1483500562616.png (608KB, 647x656px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 647x656px

>>34550020
>using two married men as an example of historical robots

>>34551951
You are the same guy who posted that penguine video in the other thread.

You are still wrong. Female selection is a modern phenomenon. Why do you think women stick with abusive boyfriends? Why do you think there is such a thing as stockholm syndrome?

It is a relic from an age where women who didn't bond with abusive kidnappers were killed.

>>34552081
Not who you are talking about. Women stay with abusive boyfriends because they are usually a better mate than a total loser.