Fembots, are you liberal or conservative?

Leftist/feminist.

self described fembots are either sjws or MAGA hat trannies

Centered with conservative leanings. I'm not all that political in general though.

File: 1459217194761.jpg (62KB, 544x547px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 544x547px

>>34492111
>Fembots, are you liberal or conservative?
liberal

feels good to be actually (((educated))) kek

>>34492111
Proud libtard.

File: thnxu.gif (454KB, 500x277px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 500x277px

>>34492111
Liberal

pls no buly

>>34492111
Liberal, becoming more conservative.

File: 1441402332812.jpg (47KB, 571x460px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 571x460px

>>34492116
>>34492163
>>34492184
>>34492195
>>34492258
Makes sense, unfortunately. Women pay less tax and receive more in government assistance. It's essentially a system designed to take money from men and give it to others (while a significant portion is funneled off to those in the state who do the taking to pay for their luxurious lifestyles).

Kind of sick of being treaded on desu.

>>34492335
Then move to another country? I mean, women are "paid less" for work, and pay more for items (such as mortgages and personal care items). So in essence the gubment tax break is attempting be an equalizing force.

Eliminating the "gender gap" would stimulate the economy.

>>34492543
>women are "paid less" for work
No they aren't.
>and pay more for items (such as mortgages and personal care items).
Because they choose to. Demand and supply determines price, and consenting exchange determines who purchases.
>Eliminating the "gender gap" would stimulate the economy.
Giving people money they haven't earned by taking it from others who have earned it never stimulates the economy because it punishes achievement and subsidises mundanity.

File: 1462320559826.jpg (61KB, 476x606px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 476x606px

>>34492184
>Proud libtard.
same not gonna lie

It made me real fucking happy when the March turned out as big as it was. It's crazy that one MILLION people around the country marched together on that day

over 100 elected officials in this country ran as a direct result of Bernie's campaign, new progressives are gaining ground... as misguided as it may be, I can't help but feel optimistic for the future

>>34492111
Hey, did you save my image off the waifu thread yesterday?

>>34492611
>It made me real fucking happy when the March turned out as big as it was. It's crazy that one MILLION people around the country marched together on that day
>over 100 elected officials in this country ran as a direct result of Bernie's campaign, new progressives are gaining ground... as misguided as it may be, I can't help but feel optimistic for the future
The only places there was any noteworthy turnout were areas where Hillary won by an overwhelming majority in the election.

The country stands with Trump.

>>34492335
>Women pay less tax and receive more in government assistance.

[citation needed]

>Kind of sick of being treaded on desu

You really consider this as a harming you?

>>34492573
>it's more expensive to be a woman
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/5-things-women-pay-more-for-than-men-2014-01-17

>there is a gender gap
http://www.aauw.org/research/the-simple-truth-about-the-gender-pay-gap/

>closing the gender gap would stimulate the economy
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/11/if-trump-wants-to-boost-the-economy-he-should-address-the-gender-pay-gap/

>>34492335
>>34492543


Want to know how I know your full of shit?

>>34492657
He's quoting from a study in New Zealand. "there's no data for the us" is their counter argument when pressed. "new Zealand and American economies are similar", they say.

>>34492715
Sure, was it from the citations I posted?

>>34492657
>[citation needed]
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926
>>34492694
>le liberal blogs that reaffirm my world view tell me I'm right
Okay.
>>34492727
I live in New Zealand, so why wouldn't I quote data from New Zealand?

But as liberals are so fond of pointing out, men earn more on average than women in America, so ergo they would shoulder a greater portion of the tax burden, would they not?

>>34492749
I live America, what makes you evidence apply to me.

>>34492335
>take from men
Yes, because all men are wealthy majority shareholders for the major corporations that make-up 90% of our GDP.
All men own nearly fully-automated factories and a fleet of employees.
Taxes are aimed at you, the hardworking, white, manly man.

>>34492762
>But as liberals are so fond of pointing out, men earn more on average than women in America, so ergo they would shoulder a greater portion of the tax burden, would they not?

>>34492773
Women earn less, that's why there's more govt spending on them. It's an attempt to equalize the pay gap. Remove the pay gap, both genders pay same amount of taxes, poverty rate declines, women are less dependant.
Got it?

File: 1436324727166.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x306px

>>34492765
>only the massively wealthy get taxed at high rates
To pay for the ever increasing size of government over the past few decades, the middle class has been taxed more and more and now it's in danger of disappearing.

>>34492732
>>34492694

The "wage gap" is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

This has been debunked several times please stop memeing. And I looked at your article, all it did was post the averages.

>>34492796
they also work less and lower paying jobs.

Mostly conservative with some liberal views (Don't care about gays and trannies).

>>34492796
So you admit men pay more in taxes then women? Cool, glad we got over that hurdle. But you think it's justified because of an attempt to equalise the pay gap?

Firstly, the pay gap is an earnings gap. Women earn less because they don't pursue higher paying careers or don't work as many overtime hours {by choice} on average compared to men. It's not because women are discriminated against. In fact, it's illegal in almost all western nations for a person to be paid less for being a woman. The simple fact is woman are choosing to work different kinds of jobs, ones that tend to pay less. They pursue careers that are less financially rewarding and are more likely to choose to spend more time with their family than they are to work overtime compared to men. In addition, when woman leave the workforce when they become pregnant, even if only for a short period, that usually puts them behind men in the same age bracket.

So why should the government be taking money from me because I choose to work hard and giving it to people who don't choose to work as hard as I do?

File: the-simple-truth-figure-2-v2.jpg (219KB, 500x1182px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 500x1182px

>>34492807
No, full time workers. Here's a breakdown from state to state.

The folks that tend to be unskilled are uneducated and generally paid less. But women are outnumbering men in degrees in higher education, so expect that number to start dropping.

>>34492111
Centre, with slight liberal leanings desu- the conservatives don't value us as humans. Nor do y'all on here.

>>34492864
okay maybe, but there is no pay discrimination on the basis on sex, because it is illegal.

>>34492804
Show me where the gender gap was was debunked. Are you sure you read it? The link I posted had a chart for full time workers. Posted it in a reply to this anon >>34492807

>>34492864
>The folks that tend to be unskilled are uneducated and generally paid less. But women are outnumbering men in degrees in higher education, so expect that number to start dropping.
That actually isn't true. A miner who dropped out of high school earns more than someone with a sociology degree.

The degrees that do have high pay pathways are things like medicine, engineering and law which are still overwhelmingly male.

>>34492878
>Show me where the gender gap was was debunked.
Here's a good article on it.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/04/12/dont-buy-into-the-gender-pay-gap-myth/

>>34492835
A. I never denied it existed
B. Just because I explain to you why it exists doesn't mean I feel either way about it. Especially when
C. I resented an alternative for lowering the tax burden on men.
D. I don't think the government should do that. I think the government should correct the wage gap, thus easing your burden.

Where do I keep losing you?

>>34492111
raised conservative until I turned ~20

>>34492933
>forgets to even say what i am
im moderate but for social issues: liberal

>>34492874
There's no apparent discrimination on sex, but there's clearly a bias. Could be rationalized as women being too needy, a distraction, not as qualified as other applicants, planning a family etc. A business owner/hr person just has to find a legal reason to sign off on a side from explicitly gender.

>>34492916
>Where do I keep losing you?
Well you lose me because you keep assuming that discrimination based on sex exists when it comes to wages. Tell me then. How should the government go about correcting this "wage gap"?

I'm an asian female. I'm conservative or more like moderate with conservative values. I think abortions are needed and have a net benefit to society, but the women who do them, outside of rape and birth defects or extreme cases, I can't respect them. They're kind of pathetic.

I also think the same of welfare and neetbux- necessary but I'm going to judge you for it. It stimulates economic growth and gives people more purchasing power, but I look down on you for being a leech to society.

Maybe it's my upbringing that makes me this way. I grew up in a household where I'm taught you have to do good in school, never do drugs or break the law, and be a good citizen and productive member of society. I think doing shameful things should be avoided and I think you should strive to be respected by others.

I'm nonreligious, but I think conservative people are more tolerable than liberals or anyone far left really. Leftists tend to think outlandish things I can't agree with- black people can't be racist. Women are paid less because of discrimination rather than their own choices in life. If both parties are drunk and have sex, the man is solely responsible for rape. They only believe things that favors their narrative or situation rather than what coincides with reality. If you study something useless like sociology or ethnic studies or woman's studies in school, you're probably not going to end up doing well in life. If you think your degree is as valid as anyone else's, you're deluded. If you think the pay gap should be closer, you should try to find success in life rather than blame it on society or others. And encourage the same for other women, to your daughters, and be a role model. You have so many opportunities to succeed in the U.S.

And, I'd really rather not date a far left guy. I tend to think they're really desperate to be liked by others that they can't think for themselves. I'd prefer to date a republican voting guy, just not one who is super religious.

>>34492956
Probably because they have to pay maternity leave if she gets pregnant.

>>34492881
A miner is also a dangerous job that's dying. You've gotta pay someone alot for that risk.

The push for more females in STEM roles is fairly new. In a few generations there will be major returns on that.

>>34492963
>It stimulates economic growth and gives people more purchasing power
This is a myth. It does not. All you're really doing is subsidising a lifestyle of poverty where they don't have to work to eat. If that money they were given stayed in the hands of the business owner it was likely taken from, they could've reinvested that money back into their business, created more jobs and provided an opportunity for that person in the welfare system to become employed. That's what stimulates economic growth.

>>34492984
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/10/21/business/the-myth-of-welfares-corrupting-influence-on-the-poor.html

>>34492984
I guess that's how it is. All of my econ professors said welfare is a good thing, so I was inclined to believe it. If you're saying welfare being abolished would be better for the economy, I'm all for it. I'll look into this more.

File: 1429933031711.png (296KB, 462x488px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 462x488px

>>34493011
>New York Times
>>34493020
It's not so much that welfare should be abolished, rather that it should be regulated so people can't take advantage of it.

>>34493049
I was thinking that too, I was going to correct myself but I was too lazy. >< I think hard working people who have problems supporting their families deserve it. Not welfare queens who are able bodied but refuse to work.

>>34492908
Ah, shit that crashed my tabs for some reason, so it took me a sec to recover and read it. Honestly it's a good read, it gives me alot to think about!
Thanks for the info anon.

>>34492878
here's based mom

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oqyrflOQFc

File: 1.png (1MB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x768px

Conservative, although I side with leftists on some issues, e.g. abortion.

>>34492984
Businessses to meet what demands exactly? Their is a surplus of labor, but a lack of demand.

>>34492984

>Le trickle down maymay

We'll just give it another 40 years, it's bound to start trickling down any decade now.

>>34492959
Apologies, pls see >>34493079

File: pay gap.jpg (715KB, 1227x1920px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 1227x1920px

>>34492956
>>34492908
>>34492916
>>34492878
>>34492864
Earnings gap is entirely voluntary.

>>34493070
My best friend is like that. Just lazy as con be. He'll work a couple years, then go on unemployment and get government assistance under the rational that he'd been paying into the system, he might as well benefit. He's about to hit the four year mark.

>>34493111
I would agree with this analysis, mostly.

>>34493111
>tfw angry feminists who are upset that their degree means nothing is now flooding my job market of choice with competition by grooming them at an early age to think they like compter science
>Most of the reason they are doing this is because only men work in it and it's a luxury job a woman could do and still get the pay to "close the wage gap" without hard physical labor

I hate the era I live in and who I am. I wish I enjoyed working with my hands and wanted to learn a dying art so I could make stupid amounts of money teaching retards who are in desperate need of a job how to fabricate simple things. Or fuck even be a plumber.

Centrist.

>>34492111
> not being a centrist

File: coolfrogmeme.png (130KB, 650x228px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 650x228px

traditional conservative values i guess (uhh err like: illegals get out, life begins at conception, yes capitalism, gay no way, yes guns, yes death penalty, no youth in asia)

File: 85185a54d31aab9411b417f5e6111eb1.jpg (217KB, 800x1136px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 800x1136px

>>34493371
>yes death penalty

why

>>34493501

Because Trad conservative means kneejerking everything.

>>34493522
>This is being said while california residents are knee jerking their way to trying to secede from the USA because they didn't get their way.

>>34493349
>being a fence sitting pussy

>>34493501

Because prison is not particularly unpleasant. A person who commits a horrible crime should not be able to live the rest of their natural life in relative comfort in captivity.

Conservatives don't really like or respect women, so I'm a little left of centre.

>>34493594
Now now, there's enough knee jerking for every side of politics.

>>34493623
>Conservatives don't really like or respect women,
What makes you think this?

>>34493623
Women have all the rights as men, to claim they don't like or respect women is a joke. They just wont recognize this nu-femnisim garbage because they know they are looking for special rights that aren't basic human rights that men have, and they refuse to entertain that thought.

>>34493688
Nah, I've never seen an anarchist be a knee-jerk reactionary
>king me

>>34493709
>taxation is theft because i don't like paying taxes

>>34493690

Anon, don't you know that conservatives are ignorant, bigoted racists who hate women and minorities? Come on, this is basic stuff.

>>34492657

>[citation needed]

Tell me anon, how many single mums are there vs single dads?

>>34493700
"women should be in the kitchen"

>>34493787
>my strawman will surely prove them wrong

>>34493758
Sorry, I forgot to add slash-sarcasm to the end. Won't happen again boss I promise.

>>34493690
They tend to think of women as lesser, inferior and only capable of cooking and raising kids (worthwhile in and of themselves, but certainly not everything in life).

They also want to get rid of contraception and abortion at the same time, which is more a societal issue than a women's rights one, but one sure to result in many unwanted pregnancies and children.

>>34493808

Tell me, why do conservative women tend to be the better looking ones?

>>34493501
id rather have the death penalty for criminals whove committed intolerable crimes than for them to serve a cushy sentence in prisons paid for by taxpayers and never amount to their crimes. death row is reserved for crimes of the worst degree. i wont allow a murderer to take the lives of innocent people or a pedophile to take the innocence from lives without an apt punishment. an eye for an eye. so yes, i guess im for the death penalty

or >>34493620 basically

>>34493700
>>34493808
See this response, anon.

>>34493821
What has that got to do with anything?

Anyway, I'm not bad looking. Thin and athletic with 8/10 face. I'm not a blue haired landwhale, and I like looking pretty and feminine. There's nothing wrong with any of that.

>>34493808
>They tend to think of women as lesser, inferior and only capable of cooking and raising kids (worthwhile in and of themselves, but certainly not everything in life).
I don't know any conservative that thinks this. Do you?
>They also want to get rid of contraception and abortion at the same time, which is more a societal issue than a women's rights one, but one sure to result in many unwanted pregnancies and children.
They don't want contraception to be taxpayer subsidised and they want states to be able to decide on abortion.

>>34493821
Ha! Oh my, it's a take on that George Carlin bit
>Ever notice that the women who are against abortion are the ones you wouldn't want to fuck anyway

>>34493851
Maybe in America. And you can't claim to speak for all conservatives.
>I don't know any conservative that thinks this. Do you?
Yup. Also, a quick google of that peculiar American beastie "evangelicals" will garner similar opinions.
> they want states to be able to decide on abortion.

I'll be honest here. I have no knowledge of what that means in America, as I'm not American. What difference will it make.

>>34493844

Less attractive women are more likely to turn to the government to provide them with resources, whereas women who are good looking are more likely to have wealthy husbands so they want to be able to keep that wealth.

>>34493620
>>34493823

The prison system has always been about both punishment and reformation. Capital
punishment however, totally invalidates the latter to reinforce ideas of revenge and to satisfy the
resentment of anyone related to the victim. It is a vulgar and imprudent method of dealing with
emotionally charged crimes. Additionally, it is an absurd waste of money compared to the
alternatives, like life in prison. Why spend much more on creating more corpses when we can
put such individuals to use in manual labor? We also have to take a look at the fraudulence and
fallibility of our current prison system, and look at the possibilities of executing the erroneously
sentenced likewise as we encourage the futile breadth of capital punishment. It being barbaric is
not even an issue when taking a look at how ineffective it is.

>>34493870

Uh, don't you mean that the other way around?

>>34493880

It literally means each state will decide what they wanna do regarding abortion rather than the feds deciding it and forcing it down everyone's throats.

>>34493916
Have you seen newt Gingrich's wife? Lel

>>34493916
I don't want to turn to the state. I make my own money.

Being self sufficient is better than relying on either state or husband-both could be subject to change and being unstable. But if you can't rely on yourself, who can you rely on?

File: 1481216748572.jpg (14KB, 324x451px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 324x451px

>>34493808

>Abortion

Look motherfucker, I don't give a single fuck about either side of the arguement; but why the fuck should anyone pay for abortion in the first place? Stop getting fucked, use a condom. It reallt isn't that fucking hard. I'm tired of all these normies coming onto this board saying how abortion should be free and you should go around getting filled with cum like it's no one's business.

No lad, actions have consequences. If I went around cumming in women I bet I'll end up in court over child support 8 months down the line. This abortion debate is the most 21st century problem I've ever heard in my life. People are making it out to be as if women take multiple trips a year to an abortion clinic.

>>34493928
Where I am, most of the states would more or less agree on any major topic- is it different over there? Is there more discrepancy?

>>34493928
Nope, that's how good ol George said it. You're the one I assume corrupted that bit. Your take on the joke is funny, too, but just in a different way.

>>34493946
How about when a girl is raped?

>If you don't support birth control and abortion you aren't for womens rights.

I'm for fucking responsibility. Stop taking so much dick, and guys should be getting yelled at for trying to stick their dick into any wet hole they can find. For fucks sake, the amount of responsibility that is being shirked off because of "rights" is a god damn joke. This is why we have 20 year olds going around saying "I can't adult today" because they are given no fucking responsibility.

>>34493941

>I don't want to turn to the state. I make my own money.

Ok, but many women do. *cough*singlemoms*cough*

>Being self sufficient is better than relying on either state or husband-both could be subject to change and being unstable. But if you can't rely on yourself, who can you rely on?

No, not if you want to have kids. If both you and your partner are working who will raise your kids?

A partner isn't unstable if you can bag a good one.

>>34493946
Dude, did you read what I said? I never mentioned anyone paying for anything. I said that conservatives want to make both abortion and contraception illegal.

>>34493987
What does that have to do with abortion and birth control?

>>34493952

I live in Aus not the U.S, but yea there is a big difference in the U.S. Leftie states like NY and CA would be more pro abortion whereas more conservative states in the south would be anti.

>>34493974

I dunno, the rapist can pay for it? If they catch him.

>>34493974
Just like any crime, you get the abortion, save the bill and then sue the asshole who raped you for costs of the abortion, damages, and then throw his ass in jail.

People are turning abortion/contraception into a civil right where it should be available and affordable to everyone.

>>34493996
Both going part time. Works for me and my partner.

Many people don't get a good one, and a relationship where one person has financial control of the other could lead to resentment, and could also be abused.

>>34494004

Contraception illegal? What, you're saying that your average conservative wants condoms and birth control pills to be illegal? That's a pretty bold claim, I'll need a source on that.

>>34494030

So you currently have a partner, and you both work part time? What jobs do you have? And do you have kids?

>>34493996
I posted this in another thread, but my wife owns a business and is main breadwinner in our family. I work only part time (but i'm also "self employed" artist), and am the full time care giver of our daughter.

An ambitious, educated woman is a wonderful thing.

>>34494034
Not average, maybe. But certainly the catholic church-Not everywhere is the US you know.

Also, I do know that many us schools mainly teach abstinence, rather than other contraception methods. slightly more subtle way of doing the same thing.

>>34494052

Are you implying that conservative women aren't ambitious or educated...?

>>34494047
We're both high earners. We're not part time yet, but we both have confirmation from our employers that it would be negotiable should we have kids, which we are also talking about.

>>34494034
Not that anon, but maybe they're just referring to birth control not being covered by insurance?

>>34494006
You should be held responsible with sex. Sex is a very important act where you create another life. That shit shouldn't be taken lightly including with the way we live and built society? We can't just go around and forage to feed and raise our young.

Having a child is a serious responsibility and being able to avoid that responsibility with contraception and abortions and still sling your cunt all over town is wrong. The act of sex is devalued and they are trying to make it so irresponsible retards can do it and not have to suffer any negative consequences. Sex was always the first adult responsibility a grown child had to handle, but now it's nothing. You can't just go around seeking pleasure in life all the time, with great pleasure comes great negative things that could impact your life. That's the balance of these types of things.

>>34494070

What are the jobs?

>>34494066
Ambitious to find a rich husband maybe. Not to work. I thought that was the whole point.

File: 1483060670730.png (22KB, 193x215px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 193x215px

>>34493974

Don't get yourself in stupid fucking situations. I don't walk out at night in my neighborhood because I know I'll get stabbed and robbed. On top of that, if whoever does that seems to want to make me their bitch I'm not in any physical shape to stop them.

I'll admit it, I have the strength of your average highschool girl, but even I'm not stupid enough to throw myself in a cage of bulls. The first step in preventing any incident is to know when to recognize the dangers before even arriving. This is the largest problem with people, you guys act like bad things won't happen, when they do and always will.

>>34494066
No, I was just answering your statement about "if both parents..."

I didn't mention politics at all, unless you presume only liberal women are ambitious or educated.

>>34492799
Well conservatives keep establishing huge tax cuts for the ultra wealthy.

No wonder the government is in huge need of taxes.

>>34494075
I'm quite high up in a library corporation-managing managers and programs and the like.
My partner is a lawyer.

>>34494077

Ambitious isn't confined to having a career that earns lots of money, remember.

>>34494107
It seems like there's little ambition involved in being a housewife. Sure, there's ambition to be a great artist or inventor, neither of which is a career. But being a housewife is neither of those things. Nothing wrong with it, by any means, but ambition?

>>34492111
I'm actually conservative I grew up in a Hispanic household, my whole family used food stamps and other government assisting programs (and I think they still do) when they don't really need it. It really pisses me off.

>>34494074
But removing abortion would hit low income families most, where an unwanted pregnancy, without any support structure, becomes a larger burden to the system.

As far as contraception, same deal. You're not gonna be able to stop folks from fucking, but you can prevent their fucking from staining the system (STDs, unwanted pregnancies, improper family planning, no familial support system).

>>34494096

Well in your case only one parent works full time, so that's not incompatible with what I said earlier.

>>34494098

I see... Never heard of a part time lawyer, but anyway. It's great for you that you can both make good money working part time, but for the vast majority of people that isn't possible -- especially in this economy. Most decent jobs require the employee to put in at least 40 hours a week, which is why the most common configurations are 2x full time, 1x full time or 1x full time + 1x part time. Part time jobs tend to be low wage, low skill.

>>34494149
He's more a manager and stuff now. Not actually prosecuting anymore.

>>34494119
It's true, you need an identity outside of mother/father, because eventually those kiddos grow up, and you might find yourself purposeless.

>>34492963
Asian male with the exact same views.
Marry me plz

>>34494119

Being a wife/mother doesn't just have to be confined to cooking & cleaning tho. They can do great things for their community, for charity etc. Not to mention assisting their partner with their career -- after all, behind every great man is a great women.

Neither: I'm a moderate.

>>34494139

Maybe, just maybe, if abortion wasn't so much of an option people would be more careful about getting pregnant.

>>34494082
>Don't get yourself in stupid fucking situations.
Yeah all those little girls raped by their dads, brothers, uncles, etc. should stop being stupid bitches.

>>34494157

Oh really. How old are you guys, if I may ask?

>>34494159

You can do whatever you want after your kids leave home. Lots of people start new career when their kids are grown up -- especially if they had kids young.

>>34494183

I think when most people talk about abortion they're talking about abortion on demand. Let's face it, most abortions aren't performed because the mother was raped.

>>34494149
>>34494149
>>Being self sufficient...
>No, not if you want to have kids. If both you and your partner are working who will raise your kids?

>Well in your case only one parent works full time, so that's not incompatible with what I said earlier
A self sufficient woman wouldn't need help from a man and would be defacto breadwinner, which would free up the male to have the role of caregivers.

>>34494198
You're just moving the goal post now. The question was in cases of rape and most rapes are done by people the victim knows, that's a fact. The whole "Oh she was walking at night and got jumped by 3 rapists" is not nearly as common.

>>34494179
That's debatable, but punishing a person for sex by making them raise a kid sans support structure is going to create a generation of neglected kids and adults perpetually on govt assistance. If that's what you want, cool.

>>34494208

Oh I agree people should be able to get abortions. Even on demand. But I don't agree that taxpayers should have to pay for the abortions. Agree?

>>34494203

Well it can work in the reverse, not as convenient tho since the mummy has the feedbags.

>>34494191
That's true, which is why I said it's important to have an identity beyond just being a parent.

>>34494229
Lol! Feedbags, love it. My wife pumped and stocked our fridge with months upon months of boob juice. To the point she was making and selling "maternity cookies" to expectant/new mothers and eventually selling the excess milk to folks on Facebook. (for reasons)

>>34494228

Hold on, not paying for someone to have an abortion isn't punishing them for having sex. In the same way that a women not wanting to have sex with you is not punishing you for wanting to have sex.

And the point of disasters like unplanned pregnancies is to serve as an example of what happens when you're irresponsible. When people see examples of what happens they might be just a bit more careful to make sure it doesn't happen to them.

I don't think that even poor dumb people are too dumb to figure out having sex + no protection = two long hard decades. I think they are at least smart enough to respond to that basic incentive. But if you keep bailing them out with "free" abortions if they fuck up then that removes the incentive to be responsible doesn't it.

>>34494265

Good God, really? Why was there so much excess milk?

I wish I had a NEET fembot gf...

>>34494268
Abortions are paid for out of pocket by the female. No federal funding goes to abortion, it's not covered by health insurance. The woman pays for that.

You're saying take away that option and force people to take on an extravagant burden on young, under-educated, unsupported, lower class, generally single women.

>>34492543
There's no such thing as gender gap. You're being paid less because you don't perform as good as those who are good. Gender gap is discriminatory. It's not fair competition.

>>34494280
Man, titties get fat with milk. It has to go somewhere. There's nothing wrong with pumping and dumping, but unless we drank the night before, boob juice went in the freezer.

>>34494313

>Abortions are paid for out of pocket by the female. No federal funding goes to abortion, it's not covered by health insurance. The woman pays for that.

Ok, so it shouldn't matter then if Trump the Repubs defund Planned Parenthood then?

>You're saying take away that option and force people to take on an extravagant burden on young, under-educated, unsupported, lower class, generally single women.

Insurance companies should be able to cover whatever they want. I don't know how the insurance market got so fucked up tho that being pregnant is a health problem that people need to be insured against. Madness.

>>34494322
Pls see the following posts, thnx
>>34492908
>>34493079

>>34494331

So she is being milked like a cow?

File: 1484001997380.jpg (13KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 180x180px

>>34492111
I guess I'm more liberal but I'm not in favor of nigger advocates like black lives matter or the LGBTBBQ crap. I hate SJWs.
Btw I don't consider most self-identifying "liberals" to actually be liberal.

>don't think I could hate women more than I already do
>read this thread

I'm so fucking glad Trump is president

>>34494344
It matters for women that use it for family planning, mammograms, and gyno exams, because that's what the funding goes to.

>>34494344
Also, I'm not saying the insurance company should pay for it. I'm saying a woman paying for the abortion of an unwanted pregnancy prevents further drain on the system.

>>34494351
Yes, by a machine. Lol she was the food source of our daughter for a solid 2 years. A walking Dairy Queen, if you will.

>>34494362

But it won't matter for abortions, right?

>>34494386

That's hot. Isn't 2 years a long time tho for a kid to be on tit milk?
Also have you drank any?

>>34494356
Giving these retards the right to vote was possibly the biggest mistake we've collectively made.

>>34494401
No, because abortion isn't funded by the government, and the vast majority of services proved have nothing to do with abortion. Cancer screening, family planning, gynecological exams, these are the service many, many women use planned parenthood for.

>>34494421
Nah, it's about average. You start introducing solid foods at about a year and a half. But mothers milk has many benefits to a growing kid.
I've tried it. It was weird. Really sweet. I didn't mind the maternity cookies made with breast milk. They were good.

File: 1433836253728.jpg (17KB, 224x224px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 224x224px

>>34494430
I don't really have a problem with giving women the vote, I just don't see why we had to give them one each.

>>34494430
>biggest collective mistske
Bold claim anon. Go big or go home I guess.

>>34494510
Hey, Don Rickles decided to swing by

>>34494494
Inducing Lactation in a woman that I love is my life dream, anon. You are living the dream.

>>34494549
Oh, she's no longer producing milk. It was great while it lasted! Two years of big, plump tiddies the size of my head.

File: 1460973748371.jpg (37KB, 650x487px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 650x487px

>fembots
>real
>Anno MMXVII

STOP MAKING THESE THREADS FFS

liberal but anti american liberals because they're fucking dumb lol

>>34494592
Aw, but it's still possible. Takes a bit of work if you aren't pregnant but sure.

I grew up with a Liberal family, however I'm more of an independent. I have certain views that are liberal, and others that are more conservative.
So basically both sides hate me

File: 1.jpg (55KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 450x450px

I don't know, my parents say I'm really liberal but the people my age think I'm really conservative. I wouldn't say I'm either.

Conservative side:
- I'm religious but I'm not super evangelical or anything. I go to church like every couple Sundays. I don't push my religion on anyone though, I hate when Atheists try to push their ideals on me and it's extremely obnoxious so I try to never be that person.
- I believe in abstinence and waiting until marriage.
- I think abortion is awful and would personally never do it.
- I'm not a feminist and I don't think women have it difficult at all in Western society.
- I believe in small government and I don't believe Americans should fund every little thing women and other groups want us to.
- I'm pro-gun. I personally own a glock for personal protection.
- I believe private business owners should be able to refuse service for whatever reason they feel like.

Liberal side:
- Even though I'm religious, I don't have a problem with gays marrying. It's more like I find it difficult to care.
- I don't have a problem with transsexuals or what they do themselves but unlike liberals I will always believe they're mentally ill.
- Even though I think abortion is disgusting, I don't necessarily think it should be completely illegal but I don't have a right answer to that problem either and I think pushing my morals on other people is obnoxious too.
- I think global warming is real and I don't see a problem in investing in alternative sources of energy.
- I'm pro-drugs being legal although I would personally never use any.

I think those are the main bullet points off the top of my head. I don't know what that makes me.

Pretty decidedly conservative.
Not terribly outspoken about it, because I don't want to get lynched.

>>34496841
I would say you're a conservative libertarian tbqh.

>>34496841
You're a libertarian.

>Even though I think abortion is disgusting, I don't necessarily think it should be completely illegal but I don't have a right answer to that problem either and I think pushing my morals on other people is obnoxious too.
You considered having it handled like divorce--where if the man and the woman don't agree, they can go to court over it?

File: 1468360094569.jpg (13KB, 640x342px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 640x342px

>>34493808
>They also want to get rid of contraception

>>34496841
You're a centrist/moderate with conservative leanings.

>>34496841
>I don't have a problem with transsexuals or what they do themselves but unlike liberals I will always believe they're mentally ill.
Don't tell that to a tranny though because they'll get butthurt that you don't think their weird shit is normal and of sound mind.