Be honest with with yourself /r9k/. Where are you in this chart?

I am originally omega positive

>>34386847
ITT: beta negatives and omegas deluding themselves into thinking they're gamma positives

A mix of gamma positive and delta positive

A+ yet i browse 4chan daily.
I don't even know why this place is fucking shit.

>>34386847
Omega+

>>34386888
Always, it's insane how reddited this board can be.

>>34386847
The chart's far too simplistic for me to fit into it.

>>34386888
Checkdkdkd

I honestly don't fit into either of these categories. Maybe I do but I'm just not seeing it, but I genuinely believe I don't really fit into any of them.

File: 1483344027358-r9k.png (89KB, 320x287px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 320x287px

used to be beta negative, but im slowly making my way towards beta positive

>>34386847

Gamma positive.

I'm currently working on my PhD, I've been lifting for seven years and I get utterly disgusted at girls that chase me for my appearance.

I constantly get messages from girls who wanna hook up, date, be fuckbuddies or be my girlfriend. But they're all so fucking dumb and uninteresting I'd rather stay comfy locked at home reading books and coding than date some fucking roasties who will probably give me stds. I also do no fap for several months at a time until something random like seeing the cute underwear of freshmen girls lookin upskirts when climbing stars or busty women rubbing themselves on me by accident on public transportation triggers a massive porn fueled fapfest cumstorm that can last a whole weekend.

File: images.jpg (6KB, 199x253px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 199x253px

I would say, in all honesty, I am a gamma positive. I am very intelligent, if only a bit lazy, and I simply do not seek to be part of the social hierarchy pitfall. Why bother, I ask?
I can develop my skills in writing, become more rational and read the biggest minds that the world has known, from Aristotle, Descartes, to Kant, to Dawkins, to Daniel Dennett, ad infinitum.

But do I only intellectually engage with these people? No for I have interest in the arts as well, from Shakespeare, to Emily Dickinson, to H.P. Lovecraft, to Edgar Allen Poe, ad infinitum.

It is by these two different cultures I become a cultured individual myself. Sometimes it feels alone to have these pursuits, and at times it does a priori sadden me. The degeneracy I have to face on this board, the unculturedness, the barbaric state I see in front of my eyes...

Hence I only come here to discuss my struggles, and use the superior boards, /his/, /lit/ and /sci/ for stimulating and satisfying intellectual debates (which I usually happen to win thanks to my strong rhetoric skills).

And you people will call me out for not actually being a gamma positive. I know this. I know this very well. So I tell anyone wishing to disagree this: come debate me and I shall utterly destroy your feeble arguments.

File: phosphorescent_by_charlie_bowater-d8r1mme.jpg (389KB, 1150x813px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1150x813px

The chart is pretty simplistic. I'm mostly positive Omega with a good bit of positive Beta, and a sprinkling of positive Gamma.

But I'm also inclined to agree with >>34386888 in that we are probably shit judges for ourselves. Especially considering that the major difference between positive and negative with most of the categories here is a lack of self-awareness...
A negative doesn't know hes negative.

File: thinking pepe 2.png (11KB, 533x436px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 533x436px

>>34387124
>Dawkins
Listen m8, if you think some English biologist with a rebellious streak is one of the greatest minds in history, you are 100 percent a negative Gamma.

File: IMG_7423.jpg (72KB, 627x457px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 627x457px

>>34386847
Beta positive I believe, but like >>34387188 said it's not really my place to judge.

>tfw real Gamma Positive
I still have no gf

>>34386847
Mix of Gamma negative and Omega positive

IMO delta+ and omega+ are the coolest personality types

>>34386847
a cross between gamma and omega

File: 1479854928011.jpg (9KB, 208x206px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 208x206px

>>34386847
Stop labelling yourself in a pack of personality traits, it will ruin your self-esteem.

>>34387701
This is one of those moments a Varg poster is right you know

>>34387701
wat?

im omega+ and proud

>>34387701
this is the only good advice I've ever seen from a vargposter

>>34386847
Omega Positive represent
This is hell

Working my way up from the bottom, Omega+ seems a good fit. Think I'll stop reading there.

File: Cuppa Joe realizes a thing.png (265KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 640x480px

>>34386847
Omega negative?

More like O-YEAH NEGATIVE!

>>34387701
Based vargposter is correct, human personality is far too dynamic to encapsulate all of it in eight stupid categories.

>>34386847
Gamma+

Oreeeeeeeeginal

50% omega
30% gamma
20% beta

>>34386847
gamma positive originallll

>>34386925
>>34387086
>>34387124
>>34387188
>>34387324
>>34387417
>>34387933

>>34386888
Tripman is right, as usual

im to intelligent to be on this chart but i guess gamma positive lol

>>34386847
Gamma positive.

>>34386888
kek.

File: Namus_2935_Reconstruction.jpg (29KB, 300x423px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x423px

>>34386847
Ascended positive

>>34386847
r9k is literally a congregation of gamma negatives. It can take many forms:
Gamma negatives delude themselves into thinking they're gamma positive.
Gamma negatives proudly identifying as beta
-/delta/omega to demonstrate to everyone their dislike of normies and alphas OR because they think that being self defeating makes people seem self aware, and are thus attempting to be seen as gamma positive.
Gamma negatives who think they're gamma positives, but just insult the chart so they don't get called out as delusional cunts.
In all honesty, I myself am not above this chart. Gamma negative is largely accurate for me, but im sure there traits that fit into other categories, but im an 18 yo high school senior so its hard to analyze. I'd say a devotion to work over social standing is a gamma positive aspect, in the same way spending a large chunk of free time on here/playing vidya is a delta aspect.
TL;DR
people are shit at assessing themselves.

>>34386847
If I were to categorize myself after this chart, I'd say Delta Positive is the most fitting. However, I don't value myself after my possessions, (I have very few) and I'm fairly popular with both male friends and girls.
I just like to have fun in a drama free environment.

File: 1484448525452.jpg (597KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1440x1080px

Mixed between Beta+ and Delta+

>>34387124
very intelligent words!!1111!!!111!1!

>>34387124
copypasta? if not then off yourself tbqh

I am white and have dreadlocks, prolly perceived as gamma negative AF (and who you pretend to be becomes who you are).

>>34386847
alpha positive

>alpha positive AMA

>>34386847
This chart makes a mistake by categorizing by personality when attractiveness is usually more important. Is it a coincidence the pictures get uglier towards the bottom?

Those deltas would be alpha minuses if they could pull it off.

>>34386847
Between Delta Positive and Beta Negative

>>34386847
Is there a chart for females?

>>34389945
all womyn are the same, no point to a chart with a single category

>>34386847
OMEGA MINUS MASTER RACE YEEEEEEAAAHH
Fuck reality, fuck social graces, fuck dominance and submission.

>>34390045
how could you be omega negative if you're self aware about it, contradicting its very definition..?

t. gamma positive distinguished philosopher

>>34386847
im nearly as equipped as an A+ but due to circumstance i land near B+. i need more money, but that's about it.

>>34386847
Combination of Beta+ and Delta+

>>34390188
I'm selectively self-aware, anon. Only when it suits me or perhaps when I am painfully coerced into it. Otherwise I wrap myself up in a big fluffy blanket of fairy tales, dreams and delusion.

>>34386847
Omega -

I don't want to be some edgy pseud, but of all the shitty options I would say gamma, though not sure if positive or negative. I have no real social circle, the only person I hang out with outside of school/work is a workout buddy, and that is only working out and workout related stuff. I have always done well in school and scored very high on the SAT without studying really. I used to read literature a lot more, but now I just do it for fun before bed and focus more on math, stuff, for school and personal projects. I used to be gamma-, stuck in a /pol/ phase, but after reading a lot of plato I started to drift away from politics completely, besides a small leftist outburst. I wouldn't say I am gamma+ though, just gamma, because I am not working on anything great, I am still in mostly learning and reading, not producing anything. Really though, this chart has pretty shitty options.

>>34386888
Autistic neckbeard basement-dwelling virgins trying to convince themselves they are in fact superior to everyone else out there who has success inlife.

I'M NOT OMEGA NEGATIVE, ASSHOLES.

Gamma positive of course
I write symphonies and shiet

What an utterly shitty chart. Obviously it was created by some bitter raging autistic virgin.

Alpha plus is closest to me.

>>34386847
EPIIIIIIC! EPIIIIIIIC!!!, IT'S ALL BLACK AND WHITE, 7 BILLION PEOPLE CAN ESILY ALL FIT IN THIS 8 RETARDED CHILDISH CATHEOGORIES I JUST CAME UP WITH!!!! EPIIIIIC!!! XDDDDDDDDDDDD

delta positive, but i don't collect anything. i hate collectors.

I don't really know where I should be categorized. All I want from life is to be left alone. I have no desires to have any friends. I'm not bitchy about it to any close relatives. I a have job.

>>34386847
If I had to choose I would say gamma negative, but I don't really belong to any subculture, I just lack the drive or creativity or ability to be some sort of intellectual.

>>34387124
good post, you hooked a lot of people with this badboy.

>>34390323
you're a gamma negative buddy

>>34390594
but that is the thing, I don't have a social circle. Not that this chart means anything, this is a terrible chart/classification system. But I don't do what I do to climb the social ladder because I have no social ladder, I actual just enjoy math and reading. I wasn't even going to go to college but I got scholarships offers because of my gpa/sat scores(which I didn't really study for), so now I am going to major in computer engineering. The only reason I had a radical political phase, or /pol/ phase was because I was a dumb kid looking for something to attach to, but I grew out of it. Now I sit in my room reading and doing homework, leaving to workout and eat. I know I am not a gamma positive, I am still on /r9k/, but I sure as hell am not a hipster or goth, I don't just look up wikipedia articles about philosophers and battles and act like I know everything about them, like /his/. Why do people act like it isn't possible for there to be a fucking grey area? Some of us just like fucking learning and being alone. It is possible to be comfortable with isolation from society while not being the new socrates as well as not being a limp-wristed hipster.