Okay unironicly and all memes aside. How can liking traps or

File: 1484931031300.png (208KB, 405x438px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 405x438px

>>34309525
Using Putin for your gay agenda.

>>34309525
It doesnt make you gay as homosexual but gay as bisexual.

Because of the dick anon, because of the dick

>>34309537
>implying that you would not fuck putin given the opportunity

>>34309525
im tired of this fucking question

If you hit your dick with a hammer will it still hurt if the hammer looked soft?

Well people have a very autistic definition of sexual orientation. It's as if secondary sexual characteristics don't matter. Not a single straight person on this entire website wants to fuck Buck Angels just because he(she) has a vagina.

So yeah,traps are not gay.

>>34309629
you are so fucking dumb

>you dont want to fuck chick x? what are you gay?

dont be a dense fucking million gender tumblr faggot

>>34309667

You can't comprehend 5th grade level sentences and you are calling me dumb?

Did you even google who Buck Angels was?

File: image.jpg (54KB, 595x531px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 595x531px

>>34309629
how can one man be this obtuse?

I think the gay part is the fact that you go out of your way to look at trap porn. If you just like feminine features, go masturbate to women. If you are masturbating purely because you like dick, yeah it's kind of gay, but whats the issue with that?

>>34309774
>google buck angel
hello newfriend
full comprehension here, try rereading and apply logic via critical thought

>>34309622
If it looks soft then it is soft you stupid butt munch, thats like saying if my dick looks hard is it soft? Fuck off

>>34309812
Dif robro do you know who Buck Angel is?

>>34309826
>looks soft = soft
you need to go back to the start of the game and edit your S.P.E.C.I.A.L. stats
make sure to raise intelligence and perception above 1

>>34309847
the mentally ill tranny that looks like a male biker body builder. It doesnt matter who she is thats not the point. That argument is based in adhoc fallacy

>>34309525
>biology tells you that you want to fuck everything that looks like a women
They've still got a dick which obviously makes them look like a dude, if you can't imagine it under the dress then you're a fucking ape incapable of abstract thinking. It's still gay you closet fag

>>34309525
>How can liking traps or trans people make you gay?
It makes you a transexual. How do you people forget that this is also a viable orientation?

>>34309924
because it isnt a fucking orientation
homo vs hetero
the known universe only has room for 2
asexual isnt an orientation either its a lack thereof

>>34309525
Well, the way I see it, the fact you're even asking questions about it is a pretty good indication that you know it is, in fact, gay.

Two, how could it NOT be gay??

Three, please continue being gay so you don't ever pass on your stupid and pollute the gene pool.

>>34309525

then whats the difference between fucking a really femme gayboy?

>>34309525
I do not see a problem with traps turning me bicurious. Perhaps I had a predisposition for that, and getting twice the porn is not bad.

>you dont want to fuck chick x? what are you gay?

Literally not my point.
Did you just learn what ad hoc was?

The point is that attraction to traps is simply an extension of your heterosexuality, not a new fucking orientation.

Now go kys for being so stupid.

>>34309826
Your dick will never look hard.
>>34309525
>all memes aside
>immediately posts meme question about whether liking a penised man is gay if he wears a dress

>>34309812

>you dont want to fuck chick x? what are you gay?

Jesus fuck that was not my point. Unironically kys.

The point is that attraction to traps is an extension of your heterosexuality. A fetish. Not a new fucking orientation.

>>34309525
Opee a gay lol

>>34309525
The point is you know the trap is a boy. You even see a dick on him. Yet you're still sexually attracted to him.

At the very least you're bi curious. I don't care how convincing a trap is, as soon as I know my boner is gone. It's a natural repulsion for straight men to be turned off by another man's dick.

The only reason you're attracted to traps/trans people is because you're prison gay. You've been deprived of normal female interactions for so long that you will go for anything remotely female looking. It's more of a desperation act.

>guy puts on makeup, wig and a dress
>Teehee it's not gay if I suck his dick! xD

Doing anything sexual with them is gay, viewing tranny porn, I'm gonna have to say is also gay. It doesn't matter how feminine they look, they have dicks and that's what sets them apart from women. If you didn't get off to the fact they have a dick, you'd just watch women. But a lot of robots who """like""" traps/tranny, are just desensitized from copious amounts of porn and sliding deeper down the rabbit hole

>>34310160
try using >> so i can easily see retards responding

Your argument is invalid and I pointed out why take a second and understand why the fuck youre so stupid it will open your eyes. and the adhoc comment was not in response to you i didnt think someone so fucking dumb could understand the concept of a fallacious argument.

Let me break it down for you.
Hetero = Opposite
Homo = Same
gay = homosexual
action determines evidence
You are gay when you fuck the same sex
Thats it.
If you act in attraction to something of the same sex you are gay.
Thats it.

If you are attracted to something that is a trap and you know its a trap acknowledge its same sex you are gay.

>>34310184
at the very least your action is gay.

Sodomites need not apply. Gas yourself

>>34310160
As far as the adhoc goes:

If you are not interested in buck angel because that type of WOMAN does not appeal to you. It doesnt mean you are gay,
If you are interested in buck angel you are still straight as buck angel is a woman. The fact that type of WOMAN appeals to you, you are most likely gay because you are attracted to manly features. BUT THIS IS AN AD HOC ERGO PROPTER HOC FALLACY.

>>34310348
>>34310381

This is exactly what I meant by an autistic definition of sexual orientation.

People are inclined to fuck things based upon what hormones fucked their heads at birth. An indicator of sex is gender, which is secondary sexual characteristics and behaviour, which is the thing people are attracted to. The entire reason why people feel "confused" when presented with a trap is because psychological conditioning of "b-but, it's a dude". One of the biggest turn-offs for me is women with piercings. It works just like that for people I mentioned.

Traps are about as gay as slender, small chested women with convincing strapons.

>>34310623
Definitions are finite just because the word gay doesnt have the same connotations you want it to have doesnt mean shit.

I understand how hormones affect secondary sexual and mental behaviors. There is over 50 years of accurate data on it. It means nothing when referring to established definitions. Appending the original proposition does not make your argument or theory true, you must reform your whole argument when the proposition is changed.

>>34310752

My proposition was that traps are straight.

I offered arguments in favour of that proposition.

And they are correct, so where' the problem?

>>34310623
>This is exactly what I meant by an autistic definition of sexual orientation.
>correct = autistic
lol

>>34309525
Go fuck a woman instead. If you specifically look for men that look like women because they are men, then you are at least slightly gay.

If you eat a person, does that make you a cannibal? Oh, I forgot to say, the person is wearing a cow t-shirt and says "Moo, bro." That makes a HUGE difference.

>>34310919
Traps are not gay is the conclusion not the proposition.

Sexual characteristics in sexual orientation pleonastic and must be rejected as such. This would also be a badly written proposition.

Buck angel argument is invalid, fallacious, and false.

No other support but muh definitions include secondary sexual characteristics. the question isnt define what people are attracted to. It is to sort into homo/hetero sexual.

Remove yourself sodomite.

>>34311066

>Buck angel argument is invalid, fallacious, and false.

It exists to illustrate that attraction to secondary sexual characteristics is a major part of your orientation.

Just think about it. You cannot bring yourself to fuck other men with masculine characteristics because you are heterosexual. Fucking traps is a straight perversion. That's why you aren't gay if you fuck traps.

I'm not even a homo lol.

Kys.

>>34311229
straight people wouldn't fuck a manly woman or a womanly man. only a womanly woman.

>>34311229
If you have an issue with
>Buck angel argument is invalid, fallacious, and false.
you should explain why either my argument is false invalid or fallacious.

I did think about it, and i responded accordingly. secondary sexual characteristics do not determine sexual orientation only given action does.
I cannot bring myself to fuck other 'WOMEN' with masculine characteristics because i am not attracted to those characteristics but that does not determine whether i am gay or not. that is what you cant seem to grasp. Determining perversion is not a determinate to sexual orientation either. Again your argument is invalid fallacious, false, and now its not even a sound argument in this post.

Im a homosexual tranny,
Ignore sodomite orders.
Remove yourself.

>>34311343
This is also a fallacious argument. However it is a posterori statistically true.

>>34311344

>secondary sexual characteristics do not determine sexual orientation only given action does

Jesus fuck they do determine a major part of your orientation. If you disagree with this too then you don't know how your own brain works.

Saying you like women but only passing ftms is fucking gay. Saying you like men but only the ones which are women but with dicks makes you straight.

Non-attraction to certain characteristics doesn't determine sexual orientation yes, but attraction to sexual characteristics does.

Well because they have dick.
oregano

>>34311586
Want to know what a dick smells like? Get on over here, sweetheart.

Every time you post your arguments become more and more fallacious along with everything else. Half of it is incoherent at this point.

ready to get BTFO?
deaf blind people who have sex

there is no longer any purpose to this conversation. I had hope you would respond with new arguments or counters but you are just repeating yourself.

a priori false
a posterori false
argument is false
argument structure invalid
argument invalid
proposition is false
conclusion is false
argument unsound

anal devastation true

>>34309525

If you are turned on by dicks, you are gay.

Why are you so worried about it?

>>34311912
WRONG. I suck dicks but I'm not a faggot because I said so. WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. You're fucking wrong.

>>34311941

>i am ironically acting retarded about hating lables even if they are accurate

That's nice.

>>34311806

>deaf blind people who have sex

What an shitty fucking argument to make. How does that make anything I said untrue? BTFO my ass.

I am repeating myself because I you keep responding to me with the same shit.

nigger, don't pat yourself on the pack even when you are wrong. My arguments aren't incoherent, you are just being a brainlet. Go get some sleep.