Say goodbye to your robot waifu
The EU won't survive this decade.
>>34240389
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCKING LIBERALKEKS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>34240389
>daily mail
intothetrash.tiff
>>34240389
OP here, more info on this bullshit
https://youtu.be/4VeCTtPazOU
The EU is falling apart tho.
GOVERNMENT GFS FUCKING WHEN MERKELLL
lmao if a robot tried to sue me I'd just factory reset his ass, the only thing worrying me is the fucking cloud. Saving robot conciousness in the cloud is goddamn bullshit
>>34240389
NO. YOU WILL NOT TAKE THIS AWAY FROM ME TOO YOU FUCKING NORMIES. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
FROM. MY. COLD. DEAD. HANDS.
I feel ashamed to be a part of the EU atm. We have giant problems of all sorts and those fucking politicians decide to discuss about giving robots rights?!
>>34240389
>Build 10 robots.
>Claim they're 3 years old forever.
>Claim 10 kids worth of child support for the rest of time.
>Reset them after 18 years old and continue.
>Live the ultimate NEET life.
>androids with human rights
>universal basic income
It's literally Star Trek but that's bad because you won't have sex robot slaves?
>>34241871
>Implying we'll ever explore Space again if we don't have a robotic slave workforce
>>34240389
>would treat a robot waifu with all the love I'm capable of
>if a robot waifu had rights she wouldn't be with me
I had forgotten my place for a moment. Thanks, anon.
>>34240389
That's old as fuck, they already drafted a report:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-582.443%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0//EN
>>34240389
ugh this is what happens when rich people want to own a sock puppet robot they can use as a tax loophole and sue people anonymously
liberal logic: if niggers can have rights why not robots?
>>34240389
Does that mean your sex robot has to have a pension now?
>>34241871
robots are literally not people
not like "black people arent people" ,but you're effectively saying vegetation has rights
>>34240389
This is about the state being able to recover taxes from businesses in a post-manufacturing world, and not really about thinking of robo-welfare.
Think about it, conventionally, governments tax workers' wages to pay for social services, and currently they're the most viable source of tax revenues, as they don't evade taxes like corporations or the super rich.
But when industry is automated, then all of that taxable revenue is lost, while profit is concentrated. Without putting some form of taxation on it, robotic automation is not just going to be a major loss for workers, but for social services and infrastructure as well.
All the major problems of western society can be attributed to the increasing inequality, obviously, this way of thinking going about it is borderline farcical, but it's a legitimate concern.