im curious, could one make a tinder thing(or whatever dating site kids these day) of a female that would get no responses?
how bad would it have to be?
>>34151550
It would have to be Shrek's turd kinda bad.
>>34151550
Not possible anon. Don't know why, but there is always some dude that would bang anything as long as it has a pulse and an axe wound.
Fuck, I'm pretty sure you could just post a picture of a bean bag chair with a wig and flesh light stuffed into it and someone would swipe right.
As a 2/10 roastie who made a "joke" okCupid when I was an edgy crybaby that just talked about how much I hated myself, and all of my faults- when I was online I got a message an hour.
Things have become apocalyptically fucked.
>>34151617
Obligatory tits or get the fuck out. Let's see how bad you really are
>>34151725
I think he was referring to the dating persona he put on anon