Reminder that Rodge's dad BTFO'd all tripfags

File: 1365122779081.png (204KB, 800x670px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 800x670px

>mfw two of those posts were mine

>>25706990
holy shit that is the toppest zozzle I ever did zoz

>>25706990
What thread was he in? I can't believe I missed that.

File: 1452302825766.png (761KB, 479x638px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 479x638px

>>25707402
three threads where OP released tonnes of rare elliots.

it was never proven that it was rodger's dad though, that's just speculation that won't fuck off for some reason

>>25707402
It's from the rare elliot dump thread, and it wasn't Mr. Rodger. It was just an anon who find Peter Rodger's old website through an archive.

>>25707439
>tonnes
Digital images don't have physical weight, dumbass.

File: 1452305224272.png (1MB, 966x639px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 966x639px

>>25707496
>Digital images don't have physical weight, dumbass
I hope the brim of my fedora doesn't get in the way, but technically, they do.

>>25707532
>technically they do
Wow you're retarded. Digital images, images on the internet, or whatever you want to call them DON'T HAVE PHYSICAL WEIGHT.

>>25707581
Technically data written on a hard drive would have physical weight, it would just be inconceivably small.

>>25707800
Citation needed. This is definitely false. Abstract objects don't have physical weight.

The "weight" that is being detected is most likely due to the precision of the scale being used. Once again, you are FUCKING RETARDED.