IQ Score Thread

>>25606856
I used to score around 100-102-105 back when I already had significant knowledge of IQ testing in general and this test in particular.

No, my life is not 'fine regardless of this score'. It is shit, and I am making it shit for everyone I come into contact with. Because of it.

>>25606856
I got 138 when I did it, I would like to try a real one

>>25607005
Sorry to hear that friend.
Another way in which the genetic lottery beats us down.
Chad always wins

>>25607050
That's impressive. I knew nothing about real IQ testing before I took this so I'm taking the score as being fairly genuine. I'm happy but with me I always want to be better.

>>25606856
>Do the first 20 questions
>35 minutes left
I wondered if it was just a keep going until time runs out deal, and since I didn't want to waste much more time on it I just chose the second option until it said the test was completed.
Still got 106. These tests are entirely bullshit.

>>25607281
>Still got 106. These tests are entirely bullshit.

Contrary to a novice misconception, intelligent people declare IQ tests to be bullshit much more often than stupid people -- fear of accepting responsibility for one's intelligence is stronger than any possible sour grapes.

>>25607218
Thank you.

>>25606856
>answer every question A
>79

I did two thirds of the questions then my food got here and guessed on the last third and got 110

>>25606856
Eh, 110. I took a real IQ test like 3 years ago and scored 133. I feel stupid lately so that's probably about right.

>>25607337
>>25607281
Also--
>>25607361
--this. I just selected all B's and got 81. Low, >>25607281.

>>25607361
>>25607381
I tried to answer every question wrong. I got "Below 79"

>>25607497
>>25607381
I meant low in the sense it was a low attempt to discredit the test.

>>25606856
I never really trusted online iq tests .Try the Mensa test, they have an unofficial one on their website

File: 602.gif (2MB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x350px

>>25606856
Sat in my car smoking a cig, thinkn about how to make moves on a qt in my bio class, and listening to Modeselektor, all while taking this bullshit test > I scored a 138
> Kek @ ppl who were actually stressn over this

File: onegrinman.png (42KB, 268x248px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 268x248px

>tfw 110
So long as I'm not retarded, I can't complain.

>>25607517
>it was a low attempt to discredit the test
IQ tests don't need to be discredited. They're already seen as virtually useless.

>>25607761
>They're already seen as virtually useless.

Absolutely. Certainly. Their many detractors can be detected by such arguments as 'IQ is not everything', 'I know a person who...', 'you can study for a test', 'motivation trumps intelligence', 'you can't define intelligence', and 'we still don't know what intelligence is'.

>>25607816
(I forgot the classic, 'there are many kinds of intelligence'.)

>>25607816
Yeah, and most people who state this are those who have taken the test and had a moderately high score, because it's not exactly a challenge.
I mean look at the test posted, it's just a few basic puzzles with logic.
It'd be insulting to see them on the back of a happy meal.
It'd be borderline impossible for anyone seriously taking the test to get a low score, even the clinically retarded could do it.

>122
I suck at pattern recognition. Come up with a real test.

>>25607940
>even the clinically retarded could do it

Retards are DEFINED as people who can't do it.

>>25607855
>there are many kinds of intelligence
You mean like kinesthetic or emotional intelligence? Because if you're trying to marginalize me just because I don't have "book smarts"...

>>25607971

Which proves this test is bullshit

>>25606856
Got 130

>that last question with the Xs, triangles, and Os.
What the fuck was that hot mess?

>>25607998
'Multiple intelligences' are either correlates of g or narrow subabilities with no validity.

>>25608028
>>25607998
In other words, 'book smarts' is a pitiful (although highly successful) politically motivated attempt to obscure g's importance by putting it in the company of other, narrow abilities which they in reality depend on.

File: IQ Test.png (243KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1366x768px

Probably BS anyway, but I got 130

>>25608094
>>25608018
I said F, it was the only one that did not have all three of each x, o, and triangle directly touching, which none of the rest did

I got a 115. Because IQ is declared to be a normally distributed random variable X with mean 100 standard deviation 15, I am one standard deviation above the mean.

So... integrating 100/sqrt(2*pi)e^(-x^2/2) with respect to x from -infinity to 1 yields approximately 84.13.

So my IQ is higher than 84.13% of the population.

File: 1451258207316.jpg (11KB, 172x159px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 172x159px

>107
>tfw when more than half the people on earth are stupider than you

>>25607965
Every kind of intelligence which is not rote memorization is a form of pattern recognition.

File: lolok.png (250KB, 2244x904px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 2244x904px

hey guys, naval chemical engineer from this morning's IQ /smartandlazy/ thread.

i thought i was 89, but im 93? i make 108k a year from working on navy carrier engines.

life is good ya know?

>>25608667
This.

Whether you recognize a 2D or 3D shape or a mathematical pattern or a physical relationship or a manmade concept or a human behaviour, it is the same thing: your brain clicking.

Very few people realize the implications of this.

>>25608699
>there are people who will believe this

>>25608752
>questions his IQ
>couldnt even crop his picture

im sure he's telling the truth familia

File: iq.jpg (85KB, 1156x593px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1156x593px

>>25606856
Well fug.

I'm kinda dumb.

>>25608815
Did you actually go to /b/ to ask them how to take a screenshot after you failed to follow the instructions from Google? Holy shit. You might really be dumb.

got 105, i kinda stop caring when i hit 30 question, its 10 am and i didnt get any sleep, but its bullshit anyways so i doesnt matters, they test you to see patterns and connections.

File: sonic.0.0.png (978KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 1600x900px

>tfw only 126
b-but my height starts with 5, I need some reason to live....

>>25606856
I got 91. I've never done well on IQ tests, but I don't think it's ever gotten in the way of my life. I'm currently one of the top students in my med school class, and I scored 95th percentile on my MCAT, so a low IQ doesn't interfere with testing at least.

>>25609528
>91
>one of the top students in my med school class

Stop.

>>25609599
I don't know what to tell you, but really nothing similar to what I'd see in an IQ test shows up on my exams.

>>25609636
>>25609599
Outside of a disability affecting either the very procedure of test-taking or a subscale of a flawedly one-sided (e.g., spatial or verbal) test, it is not possible for a person with IQ 91 to succeed at a medical school. If you do, then it is your success that IS your test, meaning you HAVE 120+.

>>25609668
In short, people in purportedly your range have difficulty finishing *high school*.

File: e-peen.png (161KB, 1190x765px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1190x765px

smoke weed erry day

>>25609668
Well googling my IQ tells me it's average, and it's certainly possible to succeed in medical school with average intelligence. It just takes using the right study techniques (mnemonics, spaced repetition, nailing down concepts, question banks) and having the drive to do it.

But seriously, the stuff on an IQ test doesn't come up on my tests. Spatial reasoning and pattern recognition isn't really needed at an advanced level.

>>25609722
>pattern recognition

Your definition of a pattern is unwittingly narrow. See >>25608706 >>25608667.

>having the drive to do it

Tautology. Post/poster discarded.

>>25609750
I said at an advanced level. I need to be able to recognize a lot of things, but it's simple stuff.

Just a quick search and I came up with this
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3240683/
Anesthesiologists had an average IQ of 98, not that much higher than me.

>>25609781
>anesthesiologists had an average IQ of 98
there is no fucking way that is true

>>25609799
I don't know why you're so surprised, they're not stupid or anything, just average. As long as you're not actually retarded, you're certainly capable of learning what goes into practicing medicine.

anyone know a standardized method of doing these? testing intelligence is such a flawed concept, some people are better runners because they train more or genes, some people recognize patterns easier because their head is wired that way or they have a strategy to solve them

maybe im talking alot of shit and theres papers out there correlating pattern solving and intelligence but it seems very unlikely to me

but back to the standardized methods i just find doing the patterns fun i dont really care about the iq part, i just want a way to solve very complex ones- are some people just flat out smarter and see the pattern with no strategy and minimal thought?

>>25609781

Are you sure they don't mean an IQ of 98 on a test calibrated to give an median of 100 for the study's participants?

>>25609781
>The intelligence scores were lower than anticipated for IQ in the medical profession. This is likely to be a reflection of the way in which intelligence was tested, and the scores derived from the rather difficult Mensa brain test may not be directly comparable to IQ scores.

>>25609799
This. I was honestly expecting that 100 was redefined to refer to the mean of that particular study. Either way, something is fishy there.

>>25609870
>>25609858
They didn't calibrate it to a new median. They just used a shorter version of the full mensa test, which they admit may not be fully accurate (just like this thread's IQ test isn't).

I don't think the scores would be that different if they took the full test.

>>25609870
>>25609905

>The test yielded scores in a similar format to a formal IQ test, designed to have a median value of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.

Are you sure they don't mean median [of the sample]?

>>25609820
Because when you compare those IQ figures to "IQ by profession" numbers on other websites, you see how wildly low both of those estimates seem. It's absurd to think that anesthesiologists (one of the highest paid professions) have the same IQ as butchers and farmers.

https://www.quora.com/Intelligence-Quotient/How-do-the-average-IQs-rank-by-profession-Which-professions-have-the-highest-IQs
http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2011/01/average-iq-by-occupation-estimated-from.html
http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/cdewp/98-07.pdf

Additionally, that study used a small sample of ~40 employees from 3 hospitals, and didn't even use a real IQ test. It's hard for me to accept it as credible when it doesn't seem to match every other piece of evidence looking at IQ by occupation.

>>25609836
>testing intelligence is such a flawed concept, some people are better runners because they train more or genes, some people recognize patterns easier because their head is wired that way or they have a strategy to solve them

This fallacy is so glaring it is genuinely puzzling. And everyone displays it.

How can you not see that your 'flawedness' is absolutely arbitrary? 'There are incongruous exceptions such as smart people failing to amount to much, therefore testing is flawed.' It's ridiculous. Where would you fancy a testing stops being 'flawed'? At what arbitrary cut-off of validity? That's nonsense. What matter is, again and again, there is literally no factor that predicts success more than IQ.

>>25609905
>I don't think the scores would be that different

Weasel words are fun, aren't they? 'That.' 'They wouldn't be *that* different.' It's like saying 'IQ doesn't matter *that* much'. Equivocation. You're consciously using an undefined and undefinable word like 'much', so that you can never be falsified (because every relationship can be construed as 'not mattering that much'), while safely connoting the insignificance of IQ that it is your agenda for other people to feel.

Old.

>>25609930
Kudos for having done your reading.

>>25609781
Holy shit I watched the video linked as the first reference and it had my sides hurting from laughter.

>>25609930
So three of those links lead back to a single paper where the graph uses data from the early 1990s. Not that old data is bad, but I'm just saying you've only provided a single contradictory source to mine. The other blog link "estimates" IQ based on median-income. I'm not sure why you thought that was relevant.

>>25609963
I don't put that much (o) thought into using the word much, it's just typing as I think. Anyways a full mensa test vs an abbreviated mensa test just doesn't strike me as something that will heavily impact the results. I'm not saying that scientifically, just as my feeling about the limitation.

Besides, my main point was that I'm doing well in school with my IQ. I'm not studying math or physics here.

File: 2015-12-18 08.23.06.jpg (1MB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1632x918px

>>25607612
i made this while getting a blowjob from my big titted side bitch and while high on drugz. i was also on a phone call with my wall street advisors and they distracted me when they said i earned more than a million dollars today.

>>25610019
Well I wouldn't want to get medical assistance from someone like you then. Because I know that even if someone magically displays IQ-defying motivation to cram the material, there is no way to make them notice and reason well in real time. Effort is meaningless there.

>>25610035
First time I saw someone make fun of this kind of posts. Nice.

>>25607940
>>25607971
>>25608005
what? i can barely get through this thing

every time I do this I just get fucking sick of it by the 10th question or so

I actually did finish it once and I got around 110. Other than that I've never finished it and it just annoys me to do. The puzzles get much harder after a while too, so it requires more brainpower for me to do it.

>>25610055
If it makes you feel any better, we do get assessed often in real time. Written tests are only a portion of the assessments. Besides that, I'm usually done writing the written tests before most of the class.

>>25610019
Idk why everyone's on your case. I've seen my cousin's medical coursework and it looks easier than the college classes I'm taking. It's wrote memorization that almost anyone could do with a little science background.

>>25610124
>wrote memorization
>wrote

How.

>>25610141
Sleepiness makes creative spelling mistakes.

>>25610124
Also:

>almost anyone

More handwaving. 'Oh, well, yes, not everyone maybe, if you insist, but *almost* everyone. Happy now? Can we stop pressing the matter of availability of achievement? This is not a productive subject. Nothing good could ever come from delineating precisely the role of IQ in success. Let it go, okay?'

Pathetic.

>>25610124
Thanks. The medicine is hard meme only exists because of the competition around getting accepted. The graduation rate at my school is 97%, and people usually drop out from mental/career-choice issues, not academic ones. It's easier than my undergrad in a lot of ways.

>>25610181
My cousin says it's easy too, he just hates the scheduling (mandatory classes 8:30AM).

>>25610168
Almost anyone can learn to read. Is that handwaving too?

>>25610221
Thankfully they podcast all our lectures online. I go to school for clinicals and meetings but overall it's a really chill curriculum.

>>25610221
Yes. It is painfully transparent when 'almost' is used to obscure the exact numbers of a relationship.

>>25606856
got a 133
I had half an hour to solve the last 4 ones but I got impatient and gave bogus answers

File: vniea.png (161KB, 1364x661px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1364x661px

112. A Mensa home test I took a while ago approximated my IQ at 127 - 129, but it included more sections than just visual pattern recognition. I'm a little surprised I didn't do worse on this one.

I got 106 which is lower than I thought I would get. Then again, I'm not sure what IQ I thought I was. The whole quiz just seems like pattern recognition to me. Man, I really tried my best and to only get 106 is a bummer.

>>25610467
>>25610412
I think this is one of the better IQ tests on the internet in terms of questions, but at the same time, the fact that the highest score it gives out is a 140 ( >>25610035) makes me think that the scores it gives out are lower than your true score.

>>25609721

133 masterrace reporting. Above are snobs and below are retards.

File: iq.png (444KB, 1323x657px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 1323x657px

Posted this in the last thread too. Basically, I'm a retarded NEET loser on disability because of severe mental health issues. I am, however, writing a book. Regardless of what my IQ is, I'm still basically retarded.

>>25610490
>thinking 140 is the highest you can score
>>25611306

>>25611438
Okay whatever, so the max is 145. My point still stands.

>>25611473
Fact it says 'Above 145' means, if it's accurate, all lower scores are correct and not 'lower than your true score'. As it has a delimiter for 145+. Therefore, only people who score 'Above 145' would be getting an inaccurate result.

File: Brainlets.jpg (145KB, 1909x774px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1909x774px

I thought you guys were better...

>>25611306
>I'm a retarded
>>25611306
>I'm still basically retarded

'I'm basically poor', said the rich man to a homeless man.

>>25611522

Every test has some random error which means that scores close to the ceiling are likely too low.

>>25608111
you mean 42.065%

>>25611782
I mean, if my literature doesn't sell well I'll probably end up on the streets in the future or be incapable of paying for Internet unless I forego food. Although, I am also working on a programming side-project. For now though, legally disabled NEET in housing commission.

135 and I am a useless retard that is not entirely sober
this test is shit and so is anything similar

>>25608815
low quality bait tbqh
still made me reply/10

>>25608815
Quality kek from me.

>>25608845
>being this spanking new
I bet you don't even know about gay sex with hats ON

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-09 at 2.13.01 PM.png (259KB, 1039x696px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1039x696px

This is where you want to be. Not an autistic that can't make friends, but someone who's more intelligent than people around him.

File: 1340985337426494.jpg (15KB, 304x349px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 304x349px

Who else /canthandletheslightestbitofpressure/ here?

>that clock ticking away

>>25611960
>135 and I am a useless retard

'I'm basically lonely', said a girl after her eighth break-up.

>>25612435
name eight smart things I've done

>>25612490
How about you fucking know words. Remember music. How about you have fucking memories from your life.

I hate people who spit and tread on what I would literally give my right arm for because they have no idea what it grants.

>>25612532
>>25612490
>'B-but I have no friends! This means IQ is worthless!'

I just want less and less to educate people. Educating them on how they insult me every time they call themselves retarded is... vain.

>>25612559
>>25612532
And it's not even that.

Do you think there are no people whom I want to make happier and more knowledgable? You of course are too ignorant to know that I need IQ for that. I will never teach anyone anything, show something, explain, help prevent, help solve.

'But it is meaningless!'

>>25612490
In short,

'A transplant? What the fuck do you need that organ for? I have it and my life is a wreck. Do you seriously think that it is enough for being happy? Having it didn't make me a successful person. A functioning heart/lungs/whatever are worthless, utterly worthless, if you don't try your best. I honestly don't get why you put so much importance on it. Just look at me -- I'm healthy and I'm miserable. Honestly health is seriously overrated. You can be healthy all you want, but if you don't use it, then it is meaningless. You could use some perspective instead of getting hanged up on things that don't matter. Motivation trumps health any time. Stop buying into the health meme, dude.'

who /96/ here?

92 here. I didn't even understand what I was supposed to do so I just clicked on random shit. Am I autistic?

>>25606856
me and my gf did this test together on boxing day to pass the time.
I got 133, she got 130.
I'm a hopeless arts degree dropout and she's an HD Vet Science student.

>>25612857
It's a lot simpler than you think it is. Look for the piece that completes the pattern. Don't look at it top down, vertically, use process of elimination, ect. You ONLY want to look at it from left to right and figure out what the pattern is. It's usually simple addition , subtraction, or both combined.

Don't overthink it.

>>25606856
Last time I did it I scored 117

>>25612379
good luck with STEM degrees, lol.

>>25609930
40 employees is enough.

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-09 at 14.00.11.png (68KB, 611x559px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 611x559px

can someone explain this one

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-09 at 13.58.21.png (89KB, 612x569px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 612x569px

>>25613024
and explain this one

cheers

>>25613024
I got 133 and I can't.

>>25613033
Pretty sure it's D. Can't explain why.

File: asdasdasd.png (132KB, 1267x570px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1267x570px

>mediocre result
>not satisfied

>>25613033
This one is easy.

Inside - outside = result

1 inside + 1 inside = 2 inside
1 inside - 3 outside = 2 outside
2 inside - 2 outside = 0 - blank

>>25613067
lol, tard.

>>25613024
Pattern is horizontal
One big bar of one color, one small bar of one color, don't mind the orientation.
So the big bar must be middle gray, the small bar must be black IIRC.

I usually get 138.

>>25613142
Also it works horizontally and vertically for the dots thing.

Usually you just have to check for a pattern, whether it's horizontal, vertical, diagonal.

>>25612532
so I'm on par with a parrot, great

But seriously, I am not decrying the value of capabilities, it's the correlation of general mental capabilities to the results of tests such as this that I'm saying is bunk.

What I hate about this kind of test is when you find two valid possibilities and then have to figure out which one the test makers want to hear. Only scored 108 because the test didn't do well at motivating me and I just quickly clicked through...

File: IQ.png (168KB, 1239x801px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1239x801px

>tfw 104 IQ

File: 1331802003739.png (256KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 500x375px

>>25606856
107, thought i'd score higher desu. never taken one of these before

File: Feelshitpepe.png (162KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 499x499px

>>25606856
>tfw mensa tested Iutism Qating 150

>>25613191
>two valid possibilities
kek.

>>25613191
literal autism

bloxyy

>>25613191
>find two valid possibilities
I, too, gave up and just guessed, for a couple of them.

>>25613302
>>25613191

Just screenshot the "two valid possibilities", explain which ones you consider valid and I'll explain you why you're wrong.

>>25608815

>le ironic tabs meme xD so le random and funny

Kill yourself

>The test is Culture Fair, i.e. it minimises
the variety of the questions, making it specific to one skill set.

>>25613024
>>25613033
I scored 145+ and can guarantee the two of you, you're retarded.

Anybody who scored less than 130 is only suitable to flip my burgers.

>>25606856
Mfw only 126
Practically a subhuman. Hopefully I'll score higher if I'm not sleep deprived and sick

>>25613508
Mfw I'm >>25612896. Okay, maybe only looking at it horizontally along with not using the process of elimination and not looking at it diagonally or vertically was a poor choice.

The last IQ test I took online it was all add/subtraction/both and finished it in like 5 mins.

>>25606856
got a 130 while watching Seinfeld

I had 140. But it seems to be capped there, I am not sure. Do you guys know of a better test than this one?

>>25613856
Oh, and btw the chessboard answer was the empty one, right?

>>25613856
The real one by mensa.

>>25613466
Exactly what I was thinking LMAO like someone might be the master on these riddles and still not able to learn a single foreign language.

>>25613944
>foreign
They don't even need to know their native language, or anything complex enough to require the involvement of a language, was what I was getting at.

File: 1d32906830dbec3d770fb6ab6ccbe078.png (106KB, 919x703px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 919x703px

>>25606856
seems about right

I consider myself above average but in my CS class at uni I am nowhere near as intelligent as a lot of my peers

>>25613401
>le kill yourself meme xD so shocking and edgy

Better yourself

>>25614181
Same score.

Felt the same way when I was in CS, but changed into Accounting.

Feels good always being at the top now.

>>25613856
I scored 'Above 145', so I don't think it's capped at 140, my friend.

>>25614181
>>25615185
Same as you two, but I'm a humanities pleb.

>>25615233
what's your secret? do you take a lot of these over and over again, or are you really that good at pattern recognition?

I scored 17 (average of 10) on the matrix reasoning portion of the real WAIS IQ test (ie: 170 - but in the 130 range for my overall average), but only scored 126 on this test.

>>25614181
>I consider myself above average but in my CS class at uni I am nowhere near as intelligent as a lot of my peers

This and I ahve a similar IQ

I normally get 121 or 122 on real tests. Here, I got 102.

the answers are as follows:
d f b g a h b e h a c f b d h e f c e d g a b h b a h g e a d e g g c f h f b

decompiling .swf files is easy and the creators of this test are morons for performing client-side validation
have a nice day robots

>>25615712
it's called the honour system anon, clearly you aren't honourable

>>25615712
Thats not the point of a test to see how you personally compare to the average, but grats?

File: honor.png (163KB, 1100x800px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1100x800px

>>25615727
ah, but that's no fun though

Scored 130, thanks for the confidence boost.

#19 gave me the most trouble for some reason

>>25615233
Fuck. I knew that drugs and depression were not a good combination... I guess the time to inject cerebrolysin has come.

File: test.png (173KB, 1238x895px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1238x895px

Solved this a couple of months ago

File: No_float.jpg (45KB, 400x484px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 400x484px

I don't feel like taking this test, but back when I was in therapy I got tested and I got 127
>tfw almost genius but still not

File: 1421639967267.png (179KB, 500x358px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 500x358px

i used to think i was smart but lazy
>mfw i once actually tested how smart i really am
>dumb af apparently

File: Capturar.png (130KB, 1366x659px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1366x659px

At the end of my Engeneering course i'll test again to see if I got more retarded

I got 91. I literally have a PhD in chemistry, though, so I guess I did pretty good in life for someone of my IQ.

Still unemployed. Don't fall for the STEM meme, kids. After over 400 job applications since I've graduated I'm slowly losing all hope.

>>25606856
Scored 142 the last time I did it, but guessed on 2~3 and must've been right.

File: whatiexpected.jpg (322KB, 1920x956px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 1920x956px

Jobless neet here who has never done anything useful in their life

What good is the ability to notice patterns if I'm a useless piece of shit.

Lets try something else. I scored a 29 on my ACT, what did you robots get?

File: iq.jpg (74KB, 1075x615px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1075x615px

>>25616987
That exactly what I wanted to write.
Since Im poor, broke, unemployed, gfless, friendless etc, having IQ of 135 is totally useless.
I dont see how solving circles is useful in life in any way.This is just a retarded meme.

File: tfw126.png (593KB, 3200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 3200x1800px

>>25616987
34 ACT here
doesn't seem like 4 more IQ points translates to 5 more ACT points though

>>25617184
Did you study for it?

I literally haven't studied a day in my life.

Also I got frustrated near the final 3 questions or so and couldn't make sense of them so I kind of just used process of elimination to make a guess. I still had a good 25 minutes to actually figure it out.

>>25617243
nope, didn't study a word
i rarely study in general, i learn by doing, reading doesn't help me at all
that's why i've always struggled with classes that are nothing but reading with no application, or subjects that are just pure knowledge, and not skills, like history or literature

Guise, these tests matter as much as yard sticks. Yard sticks of questionable craft and provenance.

And so your "IQ" is better thought of as something like height. Not every tall guy has to be an NBA all-star. Maybe you help people take things down from high shelves sometimes. Maybe you're just tall.

Meanwhile avg. is not "manlet," but rather perfectly good and dandy. Even short people can live well. Look at Peter Dinklage.

Don't let unreasonable expectations and silly metrics shit all over your present existence, pals.

This test is posted constantly. How has everyone not taken it already? If you take it once, it's easy enough to work out the correct answers a second time.

>>25619573
>>25615712
alternatively...

>>25613115
Same score for me....I kind of got bored and guessed on a few w/o really looking

>>25606856
I got 141 on this online test and 143 when evaluated by a professional so for an online test this looks very accurate. At least it was accurate for me.

>>25616987
34 twice, 35 if doing the "combine highest scores on each section" thing. I liked the ACT way more than the SAT and took both before applying to colleges.

File: 1427574383368.png (51KB, 876x773px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 876x773px

>105

I was too lazy to do the last ones so I had like 5 random answers.

Could be worse.

>>25606856
>http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf
I didn't finish or i accidentally clicked finish or time ran out idk. But i got a 104 and i only answered 25 questions? I dont know how to calculate if i got them all right.

File: 1418643190086.gif (217KB, 173x261px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 173x261px

You all realize that they can't calculate your IQ without your age, right?

This is literally complete shit.

>>25606856
chad here 143

File: iq.png (155KB, 1162x611px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1162x611px

118 but it doesn't mean anything.

>>25625160

Also I am stoned and a little drunk.

106
Scored 109 a couple years ago on a real one
>tfw average IQ among college students is 120
>tfw failing everything for years now because I'm too retarded

>>25606856
ITT retard robots think a miscalculated online IQ test make them intelligent.

File: Orly.jpg (20KB, 400x365px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x365px

>>25609722
so... clinical reasoning and clinically diagnosing diseases based on symptoms patients are reporting/displaying is not pattern recognition

>>25625211
Also, a psychiatrist I used to see for years was convinced I was the smartest person he's ever seen, and thought the IQ result meant nothing, but since then I've failed literally everything I've tried and I can't solve easy problems and I feel like shit because I can't let go of the idea that, maybe, possibly, I might not be as stupid as I feel I am, even though literally everything but one guy's opinion point to the contrary.

just kill me

File: Screenshot_2016-01-09_19-11-35.png (360KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 1920x1080px

>>25616987
32 ACT

Am I too dumb for my STEM degree?

>>25606856
>113
>Didn't even finish half the math portion

>>25625392
What math portion?

File: Screenshot (1).png (358KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1920x1080px

>>25606856
This explains a lot.

>>25606856
Does anyone really think these are real?