Can someone X-ray?

File: X-Ray65.jpg (186KB, 1080x1190px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1080x1190px

>>14679679
An attempt was made, but not much more came through for me...

File: 539184_3736881624528_536888035_n.jpg (75KB, 539x530px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 539x530px

Try her on the right!

File: X-Ray66.jpg (73KB, 539x530px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 539x530px

>>14679742
An attempt was made, but nothing came through...

File: 1469188455844 copy.jpg (457KB, 1080x1190px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1080x1190px

>>14679679
Had a blast at this one myself

File: ThereItIs.jpg (404KB, 1080x1190px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1080x1190px

>>14679679
Also gave this a try

File: picture.jpg (111KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 640x640px

>>14679759
All right!

Could you try this one instead?
Which colour is the best for xray?

File: BQbxEhQ.jpg (342KB, 2125x3000px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 2125x3000px

xray pls

File: xray.jpg (148KB, 1080x1190px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1080x1190px

>>14679679
I had to try too, now that I know...

>>14679818

the secrets

>>14679798
For me anyway, it's often less about what color than whether or not there's anything already coming through for me to enhance. Bras, thick clothes and such also interfere with the effect--often what you see is a fake made by compositing/combining photos than not. Pure black and white basically wash out detail. These two girls have little detail coming through, so for me nothing short of faking it would work--sorry!

File: X-Ray64.jpg (568KB, 2125x3000px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 2125x3000px

>>14679811
I'm the same one that did this for you yesterday...hopefully someone even better can try!

File: def.jpg (49KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x640px

>>14679945
I see your point!

So these two strings should be possible :-)?

File: img (2).jpg (90KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x640px

>>14679945

File: xray.jpg (430KB, 2125x3000px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 2125x3000px

>>14679811
ordinarily, being in full sun is an advantage for x-ray, but in this case I think the contrast is too high between light and shadow

File: Fakeray10.jpg (68KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x640px

>>14679953
Her bikini bottom is somewhat loose and nothing is showing through to enhance, so here's a fakeray in the meantime...

File: X-Ray67.jpg (91KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 640x640px

>>14679955
Again, sadly nothing to enhance as the clothes are not cooperating. This could be faked with someone in a similar pose though...

>>14680146
All right, i see this is difficult. So for the best result, something must be showing through? How about these two:

File: 1385663_590809600980237_362979180_n.jpg (81KB, 960x639px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 960x639px

>>14680172
I'd prefer the one on the far left!

File: Fakeray11.jpg (90KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x640px

>>14679955
This would be a fast fakeray of her butt...

File: abc.jpg (77KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x640px

>>14680146

File: received_1043917652323322.jpg (64KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 960x960px

Deom lukky guy gets more than one xray can you guys hook me up?

File: Screenshot_2016-07-22-00-17-24-1.png (2MB, 1521x1523px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1521x1523px

Hook me up too

File: 10429307_777292372312510_4359220913615707922_n.jpg (98KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 960x720px

Are the two on the right possible :-)?

File: X-Ray68.jpg (95KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 640x640px

>>14680183
Not all that much came through here for me...

File: 221096_222447894437080_8029238_o.jpg (71KB, 400x720px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 400x720px

>>14680318
Is this better?

File: 40381_148053888544866_7571065_n.jpg (167KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 540x720px

Could her string be revealed?

File: 1014869_10201706227643518_887869718_o.jpg (62KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x960px

Left one!

bump>>14680176