I just wanna know

>>1683163
you mean like a wasps civ or just a lot of people living in close quarters like in soilent green?

>>1683200
I should have specified.
By "Hive" I meant a Hive City ala Warhammer 40k.

>>1683210
sure why not, starting a high tec civ sounds better than a tribe with 5 people and a stick. at least we couldn't roll to build another stupid building for seventy rounds that way.

>>1683228
If it ends up being inside the hive we wouldnt really be building anything, just taking over whats already there. It would be sorta like a gang/cult starting where we work out way up towards becoming a major gang house/Hive Lord

>>1683430
Sounds good friendo

>>1683914
Im glad, how slow is this board? It seems like theres not a large population here

>>1683941
It is only slightly less dead than /po/. I'd still give your quest a whirl though.

Should I start inside or outside the hive?

Outside will be wastes of some kind, typical of a hive world. Offering more space, less resources and a more classic "civ" feel (needing to build stuff and gather materials)

Inside the Hive would be tight quarters where youd be much closer to your foes, resources and instead of building youd have to take lang from others.

nah, inside the hive, man. classic civs (almost) never survive the first thread.

>>1686113
is that because the QM abandons them or because people lose interest?

I ran a civ before, it was pretty popular (back on /tg/)

>>1686208
both happens, but mostly it's QMs abandoning, partially because participation in qst is just baseline low because of low pop

>>1686210
That really sucks, wish theyd just merge us back with /tg/ again, Id rather deal with those backwards assholes than have a dead board.

>>1683430
Gang war civ sounds neat, I'd follow it if I saw it up.

>>1683163
Do what you enjoy and do it well, quality maters more to me than subject matter

>>1683163
Sounds fun, depending on scale and who in the hive you are.

I'd rather go for being a minor noble and doing intrigue and plots.