This thread is to request a /wiz/ or /hiki/ board from hiro.

Thanks for making the thread.

I'm the same anon that tried doing the same thing awhile ago with these exact rules if you want to check my trip in the /qa/ archive. I really think these rules are pretty solid.

I think /r9k/ is in it's transition stage into a shit board much like /b/ was back in 2008 (before normies COMPLETELY flooded it and it just turned 80% porn).

PLEASE RESPOND TO US HIRO

Why would you want that here in 4chan? There's already wizchan which does an excellent job at that. Pushing 4chan to create a board catering to this small subpopulation would only decimate the hard and good work wiz(ard)chan has achieved over the years. In fact, just go there and visit.

>>942893
Wizchan is too strict in its rules. Nothing more needs to be said.

>>942892
Something I think should be on the floor for discussion are if we should ban /lgbt/ threads (since they have a board).

Also I think NSFW posting should be allowed BUT with spoilers.

>>942893
Because most people aren't willing to migrate off 4chan so wizchan will always be slow as shit with terrible mods

>ban virginposting on /r9k/
>return it to being an OC board
>let the virgins whine somewhere else
It'll be better for everyone, trust me.

>>942895
>wizchan is too strict
>make /r9k/ as strict as wizchan

>>942883
Are LGBT virgins allowed?

Remove traps and facebook threads. Remove avatarfagging and attention whoring and it would remove the need for /wiz/.

It's becoming the same thing /b/ is. A trojan horse for a VERY vocal minority of trapfags to push an agenda and crap flood the index for social engineering reasons. I came here in 2003 from SA and watched the same thing happen to /b/. Now that board too is full of facebook level threads, tons of trap spamming, shitty 3d porn dumps, and it lost its culture to retards treating it like any other web 3.0 disposible shit hole.

These people are trojan horses to the founding nerds that left SA after it collapsed into the same demographic. How relevant is SA now, Hiro?

>>942900
You guys always do this so I vote no. It's part of your identity like being a women is to them. This is an anonymous imageboard people don't need to know about it, you guys have okay outliers but it opens the door to attention whores and trojan horses forcing trap threads and the like.

(sfw board) http://i.imgur.com/Jdxyzlv.jpg

File: 1429941354701.png (295KB, 555x820px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 555x820px

Hey guys, use the following template once the thread reaches bump limit or 404s:

This thread is to kindly request a new board from Hiro. We want a dedicated /r9k/ board for social outcasts and for the board to be named /hiki/ or /wiz/.

Proposed Rules (subject to discussion and change)

>1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.

>2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.

>3) Do not make porn threads or post porn (clothed and nude) for the sole intent of fawning over, but NSFW posting is allowed BUT with spoilers.

>4) Camwhoring(tinychat/omegle),hookup, "rate me" threads, and posts and threads regarding relationships should go on /soc/.

>5) Person worship threads (like Ashley Jones/Rose threads) are not allowed.

Currently up for discussion:

>Should /lgbt/ threads be allowed?
http://www.strawpoll.me/12057049

>>942900
Ideally sex and sexuality discussion would be banned completely so yes as long as you don't bring up the fact that you're gay

>>942904
>This is an anonymous imageboard people don't need to know about it
Then why not ban discussion of male virginity as well?

>>942907
It's important to remember not to be too oppressive with the rules.

It's also important to make sure rules are very few and are more of blanket bans on something to minimize arguments on the specifics.

I don't think sex or sexuality threads should be banned because we already have a rule where is someone says they aren't a virgin, they get banned for off-topic discussion.

However, having lgbt specific rules is something I think should be discussed because they already have a board.

>>942905
>>942895
How could you claim that wizchan is "too strict" when literarly all your rules are paraphrases of the same rules they have at wizchan. Even that other anon's suggestion at getting rid of tripfags and attentionwhoring, personally identifable threads are already banned there. I honestly can't see a reason why the genuine /wiz/ can't serve your purposes other than:
1. You want ultra-fast posting rates (protip, being in 4chan doesn't guarantee this. See all the slow boards here)
2. Want shadow underageb&s to dominate the discussion
3. Too lazy to use any other site beyond 4chan

Either case, none of the 3 reasons are a reason to create a new board. All you'll achieve is dilute and effectively destroy any voice genuine wizards, outcasts etc have managed to create for themselves in places like wizchan.

>>942915
If you are a genuine wizard hardcore neet and don't like /hiki/, then to go to wizardchan. I don't care about 'destroying' it or anything. Who cares?

I like 4chan, I like 4chan's community, humor, style, and I have 4chanX which makes posting easier.

A forum has different boards for different communities. Just because you get your fee fees in a bunch, doesn't mean we shouldn't get a board when /out/, /soc/, and /lgbt/ exist.

>>942910
Because they don't have a sub demographic spamming trap threads and gay culture which is a very extroverted group. Introverted gays are a minority and tend to not make their being gay part of their identity, on the other hand if we allowed it it would open the door to the trap shills and social engieering of certain groups that attack spaces for men that founded communities like 4chan and SA (before they turned to AIDS).

I don't think anything will come of this because Hiro and the like haven't seen what happens to communities that allow this rot to go unchecked. They become irrelevant and the vanguard of actual content move on and start all over again. SA->Genmay->4chan and now we too will have to leave again without a firewall against this... attention whoring bullshit.

Samething happened ignoring the avatarfagging and trap spamming in /b/. Now you can go look in their draw thread... that's all it is is avatarspam and fags circlejerking, it lost a lot of its viewership because they spread like ivy and strangle actual content out with their fucking spam and attention whoring.

http://www.4chan.org/feedback?q=avatar&action=search

>>942915
He's too normalfag for /wiz/ so he wants board that caters to his exact situation.
If he gets laid once he will change rules to be "have sex 1-2 times is still allowed.

>>942922
>who cares
Then who cares about your need over a new board? Who cares about your rules? You just undid your own arguments. Congrats.

>>942930
>you don't care about this random website that is irrelevant to 4chan?
>Good job! You just lost the argument!

um, what?

>>942924
Male virgins have a sub demographic spamming >tfw no gf threads and whining about straight culture.
Non-sex obsessed male virgins are a minority and tend to not make their virginity part of their identity

>>942915
The slowest board on 4chan is still faster than wizchan at it's peak, also if you think wizchan has any sort of "voice" your delusional or have never posted there, wizchan is a slow no fun allowed zone that is dying because it's not bringing in new posters

>>942929
Yeah you're right.

These are the first three rules of wizchan

>Do not post about, express the desire to, suggest or imply that you have had, will have or want to have any personal sexual or romantic experiences (includes kissing, having a girlfriend etc).

>Do not post about real life social activities or friendships, or suggest that you voluntarily take part in social activities (e.g. going to a bar or party).

>Do not disparage, advise against, or show contempt for the celibate, NEET, or reclusive lifestyles.

I don't want to post there. Only really really REALLY big robots would want to post there. It's a place for a minority within a minority.

>>942936
>The slowest board on 4chan is still faster than wizchan at it's peak
no way

>>942932
>I don't care for a site that already implements the rules and caters to the demographics that I'm begging for
>This doesn't invalidate my need to implement these rules and cater to the demographic

>>942939
So you've never posted there and your talking out your ass, good to know. Point me to one board slower than wizchan

>>942934
One of these groups doesn't post their shaved legs and discords.

One of these groups doesn't derail the others threads when they have a billion boards they post on already (/b/, /lgbt/, /trash/, /y/, /cm/, /hm/).

One of these groups isn't prone to attention whoring and contentless threads.

>>942941
I could redirect you to thousands of outdoor forums. Why do we need /out/? We don't. 4chan is just a website with a bunch of different boards for different hobbies/interests/lifestyles.

Do we even NEED 4chan to exist at all? No, but it does so we're going to use it because we already use it.

There is no argument to be had. You just don't like us and want us gone.

>>942924
I don't think teenage moot founded 4chan as a "space for men".
GO to reddit if you want some men's rights and/or mgtow shit.

>>942949
Do you think teenage moot founded 4chan as anything but an anime forum?

Do you think the first religious settlers in North America founded their settlements as anything more than settlements just for them and them alone?

>>942944
>One of these groups doesn't post their shaved legs and discords.
Already handled by proposed rules.

>>942944
>>942934
>>942949

Woops, forgot /soc/ too and /srs/.
He founded the board with an /l/ board and a gore board (old /g/) and you fuckers are the same type of people that rally against this founding culture.
You've been doing it for decades following people to relevant communtiies, turning them to shit, devouring yourselves when the content creators leave, and then following them slowly to the new place.

>>942952
No board was intended as a space for men, go sorry you're butthurt that it's changing and you can't talk about tfw no gf all day. Go to /r/incel.

File: 1444167914434.jpg (91KB, 463x450px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 463x450px

For everyone wanting to participtae in this /qa/ thread:

Just hide all the posts of people telling us to go to wizchan or how we're all dumb or whatever.

This thread is just for the refining of the proposed rules and working out how a hypothetical board would work if we do get Hiro's favor.

>>942954
>you fuckers are the same type of people that rally against this founding culture
Who are you talking about?

File: 1483767486311.jpg (19KB, 234x274px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 234x274px

>>942960
>turning thread about how you want a safespace into a safespace

>>942965
>posting on a site that has a gay, pony and furry board
>still worried about safespaces

>>942954
>the straight virgins are the content creators!

I propose we don't ban /lgbt/ related feels, just threads specific to /lgbt/ concerns.

For example:

>new thread: Any gay robots feel out of place in modern society?
off-topic

>in reply to a post: Yeah, as a gay person, I don't like how hedonistic gay culture is. They are gay before they are a person.
on-topic

would this be too complex?

>>942976
That second quote is just as specific to /lgbt/ concerns.
The only difference is it disapproves of lgbt culture. Are only self hating gays allowed?

>>942976
They already have ~7 boards where they can do just that and it opens a very wide door to do what they did to places like r9k and /b/. It's too big a part of their identity as a group.

>>942978
That's what I'm worried about in having a rule like that. Might just be too confusing in enforcement.

What I'm trying to show there, however, is that one is a thread exclusive to gay things. /lgbt/ is for that.

The other is a comment on being gay in passing. It's talking about being gay or gayness (doesn't have to be self-hating) but isn't making the thread exclusively into a gay thread.

Do you see what I'm saying?

>>942984
the link is messed up

>>942986
my client can't delete the trailing slash so it sends it to the catalog search. Just go to their index and find it it's this thread and was on page 1:

"tfw no bf lonely feels thread
All NEETs and kissless virgins get in here. Biscum and sluts get out."

Or go look at the index in general its full of similar threads. They already have a space.

>>942988
that's a pretty good point.

Keeping lgbt to /lgbt/.

It's literally 100% their board, isn't it?

How would we word a blanket rule? After that we have to put up a strawpoll (with captcha)

>>942990
1. Gay identity threads belong on /lgbt/
2. Global rule #13 is strictly enforced
3. No links to discords, skype, or social media
4. No facebook level threads or 3d porn dumps


Here is /lgbt/'s current rules, what we are proposing would be hypocritical not to have a counterpart.


>This board is for the respectful discussion of LGBT lifestyle and the LGBT community.
>Hookup and "rate me"/camwhore threads belong on /soc/.
>Remember, this is a WORKSAFE BOARD. Absolutely no nudity or pornography!

trap and gay shill threads are taking over nearly every board on the site including /vg/ despite the vast majority of the population not being interested in NSFW trap/futa garbage in video game threads (especially the path of exile, warframe, and numerous other communities): This isn't a problem plaguing /r9k/ alone and there are groups on cripplechan that are directly responsible for pushing it here.

File: kM_lPhzP.jpg (24KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x400px

>>942994
>development board

???

>>942996
>trap and gay shill threads are taking over nearly every board on the site including /vg/ despite the vast majority of the population not being interested
How does that work?
You sound paranoid desu.

>>942996
If you include the word ''thread'', you make it okay to mention being gay within threads.

Bringing up global rule #13 is redundant as it's already a global rule, and should we really ban skype/discords? This is a board for social outcasts, so is there anything wrong with social outcasts wanting to play video games with one another?

And I think rule #4 is already taken care of with the no NSFW posting in the OP

>>942999
>How does that work?
Literally 8ch someone linked to their threads yesterday and they're raiding /r9k/

>>942999
It has people in poeg posting traps in panties showing off their shaved legs and cumming in their panties. They reply to no one and just dump trap porn.

On a SFW board. About video games. In their specific threads. Same demographic is in the /b/ draw thread because it was coopted by people spamming tranny shit on the index until all the actual board content left and this was half a decade ago. Same thing is happening to multiple boards now.

There are orginzed groups doing it from cripple chan... though in the worst places there is endemic groups of them like the /b/ draw thread that is full of avatarfagging and gay culture /soc/ because those are the irrelevant communities these people build. They pushed everything out through sheer spam and samefagging.

I'm going to simplify the OP rules and also add in the proposed /lgbt/ rule. Tell me how it looks and if it looks overly complicated.


>1) Posters cannot directly reference themselves as women.
>2) Posters cannot directly reference themselves as are non-virgins.

Relationship can "imply" sex, even when it was a "relationship" when you were in preschool or in 2nd grade some girl said you were cute and pretended to date you or something. I think it's better if we just keep it at specifics for both rule 1 and 2.

>3) Do not make porn threads or post porn. NSFW posting is allowed with spoilers.

Simplified this rule. No porn.

>4) Camwhoring(tinychat/omegle),hookup, "rate me" threads, and posts and threads regarding relationships should go on /soc/.
>5) Person worship threads (like Ashley Jones/Rose threads) are not allowed.

I'm leaving for the night. Please reply

>>943002
Are you talking about /lewd/?
That board is people from /r9k/ and is small. I don't think they were even raiding.

>>943006
oh, the lgbt rule


>Keep anything referencing lgbt in lgbt

however I do think this could hamper political discussion if it ever comes up.

>>942968
All of those boards still permit dissent and even outright shitposting. /pol/ bullies /lgbt/ all the time.

What you're asking for is a board with Nazi-tier moderation on a site whose biggest claim to fame and source of popularity is its incredibly libertarian moderation policy. It completely clashes with the culture of the rest of the site.

The only way I can see Hiro allowing this is if you offer to pay the server costs and moderator wages for the new board yourself, and if you have the cash to do that then you might as well just make your own website.

>>943007
Not him but from what I can tell they are a pretty large discord group from leftypol.

>>943009
>banning nonvirgins is nazi tier moderation
Sure a thing friend

File: 1398938295809.jpg (83KB, 510x430px)

83KB, 510x430px

>>943010
Ah yes, /lewd/ is an arm of /leftypol/ just like /leftypol/ works under CTR, which is, of course, a branch of JIDF.

>>943006
Leave rule 1 as is, change rule 2 to
>2) Posters cannot directly reference themselves as are non-virgins or as being in or having been in a relationship.

>>943009
Why is /lgbt/ a thing even though they are they are %3.6~ of the population? Pretty sure virgin men are exponentially more of a demographic esepcially on this site (or they were until the people shitting all over the boards weren't content with 8 containment boards).

>>943014
Yeah, honestly I can see how just saying they were in a relationship can be a loophole around saying they arent virgins.

I think that is fair.

>>942999
https://archive.fo/fP1yk
Explain this then. The link in the archive will take you to that very 8ch thread.

>>943013
This goes all the way to the top!

>>943015
Don't pay him any mind

Read this please >>942960

File: 1462170316369.png (85KB, 475x455px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 475x455px

>>943015
>A new study by trend forecasting agency J. Walter Thompson Innovation Group found that only 48 percent of 13-20-year-olds identify as "exclusively heterosexual," compared to 65 percent of millennials aged 21 to 34.

>>942976
I don't know, I mean what about gays who hate the out and proud culture? Not all of us are extroverts and that usually dooms you to 4ever alone. I mean it is a mirror to straight robots. The usual response on /soc/ and /lgbt/ is to stop whining and use kik, grindr, etc. to hookup. It's sooooo easy, anon. Isn't that the same shit introverted straight males get told, albeit with tindr instead? Do we not feel lonely, too? Did we not suffer seeing our few hard won male childhood friends grow up and get interested in girls and love? I agree that the attentionwhore gay and trap threads are not appropriate content, as exhibitionism is decidedly not an introverted characteristic. I disagree that there is no room for topics concerning gay robots. Remember, we too face a harsh reality where gay culture highly prizes the extroverted Chad as the ideal mate.

Holy shit, this stupid request is back? FUCK YOU. NO NEW BOARDS.

>>942892
And you're seriously going to pretend you didn't create it yourself when you showed up literally a few minutes after it was created.

This is literally NEVER happening.

File: 1483640409947.jpg (20KB, 263x250px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 263x250px

>>943618
>FUCK YOU. NO NEW BOARDS.
manga board

>>943631
NO. NEW. BOARDS.

File: 0bfc7c396ba16199b60c0a20a1a8718b.jpg (322KB, 800x1130px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 800x1130px

can you still fap to Tewi knowing that Hiro's alter ego was created with her in mind?

can you still look at lewds of her without seeing Hiro's disgusting face?

>>943674
Bunny Hiro is only similar to Tewi by coincidence. Hiro himself has black hair in that exact hairstyle, and the bunny ears are just a general Japanese thing. They aren't particularly similar otherwise, no more than he's similar to any other anime girl with short black hair.

I don't care much about Tewi anyway but it's not difficult to separate the two.

>>943014
>>943017
I'm still not sure about rewording it like this

I had a gf when I was in preschool.

However, I still see the loophole in that normies can go

>I was in a relationship with someone for X years
>OH BUT I AM NOT SAYING IF I HAD SEX OR NOT

and completely defeating the purpose of the rule.

I add my vote to banning non-virgins. I think this is the most important point.

>>942994
>/lgbt/ isnt a containment board
delusional cunt

>Don't give advice unless requested, this is not /adv/

do this hiro

>>944340
how would you go about enforcing that
i could just say i'm not a virgin and you'd have no way of proving otherwise

>>944344
I really like this, including the wording of it.

That would allow self-improvement threads if people wanted them without having them being made by preachy normies.

I would be open to adding this to rule #4. Anyone else have input?

>>944345
Did you miss the part where my post said "banning"?

>>944345
We can just take you at your word as OP's rules indicate

File: 've made a huge mistake.gif (3MB, 500x246px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x246px

I guess all kinds of eras come to a close.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl3vxEudif8

>>944345
We're not going to hunt down non-virgins if that is what you mean.

Simply don't say you're had sex.

It's like rule #1. Women ARE allowed to browse. How would we even stop them? There are already women on /r9k/ who pretend to be men already. They'd probably like that rule.

Simply don't say you're a woman.

Strawpolls for the rules listed in >>942883
Vote if you want to.

1) https://www.strawpoll.me/12065585

2) https://www.strawpoll.me/12065645

3) https://www.strawpoll.me/12065607

4) https://www.strawpoll.me/12065625

5) https://www.strawpoll.me/12065629

I posted these on /r9k/ as well. I want to get a decent size sample.

>>944356
what do you think about >>944344 and my comment in reply here >>944348

>>944362
I think it's a fair proposal.

>>942883
your first two rules are your personal gripes.

>>942883

Ban discussion regarding traps/transexuals, they have /lgbt/ for that. There is no serious discussion to be lost, it's all bait

Make /r9k/ blue, there are two thread types that contain porn

>Gay threads
"Why don't you succ my dick"

>Women bait threads
>"you'll never get this, losers"

>>944362
>>944370

Actually I rescind my comment.

Imagine

>My VCR doesn't work. It sucks.
>In reply: You should do XYZ
>WOW RULE BREAKER! I DIDNT ASK

Who cares if normies come and preach? It's not like it'll be wave after wave of normies coming in. How often do robots go to /soc/ to tell them they are terrible normies?

>>>/r9k/34003826
Fag thread. Got another one for the jannies.
>>944373
Fair enough.

>>944372
I think if we had a blanket rule along the lines of
>6) lgbt specific threads (are traps gay? / Post gay feels!) should go on /lgbt/

that way it's a blanket rule, no real inter-posting specifics to worry about, and it handles the trap problem.

LGBT people can be robots too.

>>944380
But not attention starved agenda pushing trannies.

>>944380
Yes they can.

I think with what I said here >>944378

We can prevent dumb /lgbt/ shitposts, but still allow people to go "i'm gay" in a thread without the thread becoming a gay only thread.

I want to add a sixth rule to the proposed rules.

>6) LGBT+ thread topics should go on /soc/

This will allow being able to mention being gay or whatever in passing as a reply in a thread but keep out lgbt threads from the board as a whole.

Thoughts before I post the strawpoll?

>>944383


Agreed,>>944378 is a good way to handle it, while still allowing discussion to arise naturally.

>>944392
There is no reason for LGBT topics to belong on /soc/ idiot.

Along with my rule proposal >>944392

I want to also suggest a change to the wording in Rule #4

I want to change

>and posts and threads regarding relationships should go on /soc/

to

>and posts and threads regarding personal romantic relationship should go on /soc/

This way, talking about friends is allowed, talking about the concept of relationships is allowed, but talking about your gf/exgf isn't allowed.

Thoughts?

>>944402
>talking about friends is allowed
Fuck off normalfag.

>>944405
We aren't creating wizchan.

Overly strict discussion topics are dumb and no one will post there

>>944398
I think he meant /lgbt/

>>944409
You're just creating board that fits your personal tastes.

>>944414
The goal here is to create a /soc/ equivalent for social outcasts but frame the discussions

We can't witch hunt and allow only hardcore neets. It'll be a dead board otherwise.

>>944414
No. /r9k/'s Robot community wants a board where we can discuss what we like without everything getting derailed by women looking for free stuff and attention whoring /soc/ crossboarders.

>>944419
Why would a social outcast talk about his friends?
>>944421
If you're a robot you don't need to talk about your friends.

>>942883
why?

>>944422
That's a little too strict. You should be able to mention friends at least. Just no talking about relationships or fawning over women.

>>944422
Social outcasts can have social outcast friends.

A major reason wizchan is dead is overly strict rules.

Even the columbine shooters were best buds

>>944356
Rule 1 and 2 aren't really negotiable, without them the whole board is pointless

>>942883
The opposite of #2 should be a global rule. Nobody cares about your women problems.

>>944378
Gay feels can be robtic.

Reposting what I said in a previous thread:
Ban trannies, not gay people. If you don't partake in casual sex gay people have it even harder than straight people to form relationships because you can't tell who's gay by looking at them, and apps are only good for casual degeneracy. Hence, gay people are more robotic than most.

I'm still waiting for a counterargument to this.

Hiro is too lazy to do anything.

>>945351
Because the point isn't to make a gay board it's to make a wizard board, as has already been pointed out there's multiple boards catering to gays, there's not a single board catering to wizards and casual sex disqualifies you from that

>>945759
Read my post.
If you DON'T partake in casual sex, you can be a wizard while being gay. Gay people who don't partake in casual sex are more robot than straight people. Wizards can be gay, so a "wizard board" includes gays.

>>945759
>gays can't be wizards

Why is it /qa/ is actually defending the mods and are dead set against things that will actually help the site?

>>945771
Because /qa/ is likely full of raid tourists from Reddit/SomethingAwful who want to fuck up 4chan because they hold an autistic grudge against the site.

>>945768
If you don't partake in casual sex then yes you can be a wizard, but still there's multiple boards for you, go to one of those. I don't have a problem with gay posters the problem is that gay posters tend to spam their threads and attention whore, thus the situation on /r9k/ right now where trap threads are constantly up because gay posters can't control themselves outside of the board that was made for them.

>>945771
The fact that /qa/ are the ones that got the cuck filter removed just as it was dying should tell you all you need to know.

>>945778
I did say traps could be banned. As it is, there's no objective difference between gay wizards and straight wizards. Gay wizards have all the rights in the world to share their feels, and you only disagree because you don't happen to be one. You aren't using actual arguments. No, gay wizards can't go to /lgbt/ because there's only normies there.

>>945779
/qa/dditors are the worst. Most of them are from Reddit and Tumblr and all of them are huge SJWs

>>945780
If they could keep it contained it would be fine, but once again I don't see that happening gays tend to base their whole identity around being gay and attention whore based on that, if gay specific posts were allowed there's a large chance the board would be overrun

>>945799
If the board were "overrun" as you say, but the posts were about wizardry, you have yet to tell what's the problem. Other than you not being able to relate, I mean. I repeat: Gay people can't discuss robot feels in /lgbt/, so don't pull the "go to your containment board" card.

Simple, make /r9k/ a blue board and ban porn outright. Trap fags will be forced to fuck off to /soc/

>>942883
nice
i support this

>>945804
The fact you're so insistent on forcing gays into this already shows the general mentality of gay posters and why you have a containment board in the first place so yes I will pull the go back to your containment board card, you guys are a very small portion of this site smaller than actual wizards even and yet demand to force your way into everything. The point is to make a board for traditional internet definition of wizards and gays aren't included in that.

>>945818
>Look at your attitude!
Not an argument. Never have I said I'm gay myself.
>gays aren't included in that
Wizard: Virgin male beyond the age of 30.
Yes, I believe it does include gay people. You are the one who seems strangely obtuse about this, my dude.

>>945823
Yes stop forcing gay shit out of your containment board

>>945826
>forcing
Nothing is being forced. You're the one trying to force something.
>containment board
/lgbt/ isn't meant for wizards. Any other pointless post you want to make?

I'm reading a lot about you guys wanting traps banned but that is overly specific in my opinion.

We can't ban specifics, just enforce vague rules.

We have to be realistic about the execution of the moderation.

If there is no porn allowed, no romantic relationship posting allowed, no woman posting, no non-virgin posting, no attention whoring, and ultimately no gay specific threads, why would traps be a problem?

also new /r9k/ thread is up

>>>/r9k/34030002

>>942952
>Do you think teenage moot founded 4chan as anything but an anime forum?

he was 15, and the site was made for adults who frequently posted child porn

moot has confessed before he wants to be a little girl

it's pretty clear to me he made the site to find a sugar daddy

File: 1483398345428.png (217KB, 721x692px)

217KB, 721x692px

Everytime /r9k/ crawls out of their hole we see firsthand why everyone hates them, online and irl
Your type are the ones that killed /a/
I hate you, i hate you, i hate you
You will never touch a woman
Just off yourselves already.

Quick reminder to ignore anyone on the /qa/ just dropping in to insult us robots or tell us to stop trying to make a board.

/qa/ is just for discussion.

>>945999
Hey OP, I feel like this is heading towards the wrong direction

we are called robots

everyone knows what robot means - a KHV male with no friends, this is, at least in my opinion, a significant component of robot culture

so... why should we leave the board on which robot culture was born, on which robot culture grew into what it is today?

Why shouldn't a board be opened as an overflow for all the people who are NOT robots to post the shit they post on /r9k/?

>>946006
It's easier just to leave and form a permanent /r9k/ board as opposed to having to fight to keep it all the time.

Leaving is the road of least resistance. Using force to kick out normies is much harder.

lol if hiro decides to implement this (I doubt he will because rules except 5 and maybe 4 are just plain stupid) I hope he does it as a totally new board. We want to get the khv autists out of /r9k/, not surrender /r9k/ to them.

File: 1427693482272.png (214KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1000x1000px

>>946018
Thanks for the support!

>>942883
but we already have /trash/

>>946006
>KHV male with no friends
KHV males with no friends, education, or employment, but with mental problems. The vast majority of friendless losers are infinitely superior to robots.

this shit is useless, the normals will just follow us there and shit up the board.
camwhoring and person worship should be banned from r9k

and no fuck the no porn rule.

explicitly ban traps/tranny/futa spammers (they have containment boards) as well as facebook level threads like cam whoring and 3dpd porn dumps. Ban discords / namefagging / avatarfagging.

problem solved.

>>942883
please remove the trap/faggot threads from r9k, they're the cancer of the board.

>>946254
This

>>942883
Yes please

Just ban traps and circlejerks/generals (not to be confused by themed recurring threads)

>>946804
>themed recurring threads
AKA generals you like.

>>942883
I will raid that board everyday with my friends from /r9k/ abd /b/

>>942883
If any new board is created I will take it upon myself to infiltrate and steal the virginities of every single anon involved

File: 1387689226931.png (502KB, 612x455px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 612x455px

Not that this will lead anything, but stop calling it /hiki/ or /wiz/ since it has nothing to do with either of those things. /r9k/'s average age is something like 17. Neither of those communities can tolerate you guys for a multitude of reasons.
You already destroyed the "NEET" term, don't take away hikikomori and wizard, too.

>>946908
wizchan is the same, it's all teen/early 20s calling themselves future wizards.

>>945778
Ban attention whores and attention feeders then.
Blanket ban on gays goes directly against the whole
>we don't want to be nazimod playground like wizchan

>>942883
Sounds good. Attention whores are a plague.

Stop calling yourselves "hiki".
Hiki=Hermit
None of you are hermits, you are cancerous loudmouths whoring for (You)'s with your dumb frogs on 4chan.

I can't believe this shit thread is alive again.

If you want a board with completely unprecedented rules, make your own fucking board. Nobody is stopping you from doing so. If you think the mods will dispatch someone to cater to your dumb sensibilities all the time (or god forbid, make you a mod) you're completely delusional.

>>948229
>dispatch someone to cater to your dumb sensibilities all the time
That's how you could describe any request made in /qa/.

>>942960
I'm usually happy to browse your board, because seeing your peers wallowing in self despair and falsely convincing themselves they're on the right path makes me feel good about my life choices. However, nature or God or chance or whatever brought you to earth made a huge mistake and thus you look at the mirror and see something most of the people you meet find disgusting: again, I'm very happy that your board is seemingly aware of this because as outcasts you should hide away from normal people, and feel shame and anger.

However, when I see people requesting changes to your board I feel nothing but true disgust. You should not even be able to express your views, let alone ask for favours. You were born inferior because of your lack of sexual appeal and your inability to be with other people.

I just wanted to say this, who gives a fuck about a bunch of virgins ugly freaks. For all I care you could disappear from earth and nobody would notice it, not even your "internet friends". But /r9k/ was never meant to be a home for losers, you stole it and now you have the courage to demand this. Your internet life is so rooted into your mind that you take the time to fight a battle for nothing. I pity you.

>>942883

I'd be willing to support this if I could be guaranteed that you frog-posters would be completely contained inside of it, but I don't believe that'll ever happen.

Want to know at least one of the reasons why 'normies' are always going into /r9k/ and 'triggering' you by talking about their sex lives? Because they're sick and tired of you shitting up other boards with your non-stop 'women are horrible because they won't have sex with me' horse shit.

As far as I'm concerned; until you stop spreading your toxic butthurt from one end of 4chan to the other, you don't deserve a 'safe space'.

>>948579
This better be bait and not actual retardation

>>948748

Or what?

>>948494
Yikes

>>942883
Do you know how much moderation that would involve