Should small boards have an anti-sliding measure in place?

dumb frogposter

hidden

>>1578788
Yes. Unfortunately the staff have to do all the upkeep for this great site we love FOR FREE, they really don't have time to implement such technologies!

>>1578844
¥for free
that's old news, it was leaked that they actually get free 4chan passes

>>1578850
We all got free 4chan passes a few years ago yenfriend!

Those anti sliding measures would probably only destroy most smaller boards like /po/ in the process. You might as well remove every page but page one on them. A return of old thread pruning could probably be a good thing however

>>1578788
>dumb frogposter can't figure out basic things
really fires up the neurons

>>1578788
Fast boards should too. It should be impossible to wipe any board before a mod can respond. Fast boards could get more pages to accommodate this. Perhaps all boards could get more pages, but with increased cooldowns for bumping from the extra pages to prevent abuse.

>>1578860
How would they destroy the small boards?

>old thread pruning
You mean pruning by age? That would just make the problem worse.

We have the internal archive, and it should be possible to automatically restore threads from there when spam threads are deleted.

i should have anti sliding measures in my butthole

>>1579217
That'd hurt

>>1579219
no is just sometime it slips out so gotta pop it back in you know

>>1578792
t. tsunadere

>>1578788
le dumb frogposter lol