How do we find the anti gravity particle /qa/?
>>1561214
Do you have a particle accelerator?
Japanese Science is based around the souls of people resonating with reality so we'd need to go about finding proof that reality is shaped by conceousness
We already have. Some subatomic particles don't behave according to gravity, like neutrinos.
>>1561260
Can we make shoes from them?
>>1561263
No, because they don't according to gravity. Ergo, they experience no attractive or repulsive forces from other particles.
>>1561214
Gravity boson particle is its own antiparticle.
0 = 0
>>1561270
Wait, really? Doesn't that mean it can annihilate itself?
>>1561214
That's a good question for the elites who run our world and feed us the sanitized version of physics which doesn't allow for any technologies that would ever let us break free from our enslavement.
You don't want to find it because all it will mean is a friendly chat with some people you don't ever want to meet and possibly an early grave.
First we have to find the gravity particle which we haven't done yet and probably won't happen at least in the next 20-50 years.
>>1561741
Where would the energy go?
>>1562348
How much is 0 energy + 0 energy?
We never will.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX48uFXM2qI
With science.
>>1562736
They wouldn't (theoretically) have zero energy.
>>1561260
On the contrary, all particles behave the same way under gravity, because gravity is something happening to the space the particle is in, not to the particle.
I don't think anyone's measured it for neutrinos as that would be very difficult, but very precise tests of the equivalence principle have been done showing that all known particles fall precisely alike. The slightest difference would indicate there was something wrong with the modern explanation of gravity as space-time curvature, but none has been found.
On the bright side, there's no need for anti-gravity in order to fly. All you need is a force keeping you up in the air.