Are tripfags cancer?

>>1552958
They were a much bigger deal before /pol/ basically turned this whole site into normieville.

Now it doesn't really matter. Adding a tripfag or two is just pissing in the wind

you tell me

>>1552966
MUH /POL/

>>1552970
arguing against facts with emotion is pretty SJW

>>1552971
What facts how as /pol/ ruined 4chan,
don't tell me muh r/thedonald, /qa/ fags have hated /pol/ for ages way before the election.

>>1552970
>>1552978
Here's some examples of shitposts from /pol/ users: >>1552970 >>1552978

>>1552978
and /pol/ has been a normalfag board pulling in scores of people from social media long before the election too

>>1552958
Some of them are.

File: 1502243423354.jpg (109KB, 938x821px)

109KB, 938x821px

>>1552981
Thanks for the 4 (you)'s, sorry for not making a weeb thread with no questions.
>>1552982
Post proof or it's just hear say, because asking /qa/ for a non biased view of /pol/, is like asking a /r9k/ for a netural view on women.

File: 14163e5ee62e016855a8509af7b8d894.jpg (852KB, 3000x2124px)

852KB, 3000x2124px

>>1552998
Dumbass, I called you an SJW knowing it would get you responding.

>>1552998
>proof
you realize how stupid it is to ask for this right? What are you expecting me to pull out charts and graphs, some of which magically graph "normalfagness over time" or what?

But what exactly is it that you're unsure of? Are you saying you don't think /pol/ pulled in tons of users from social media over the years? Because I'm pretty sure openly posting links to reddit/twitter/facebook has been standard practice on /pol/ for years

They can be as cancerous as some anons are here.

If they shitpost: yes, they are.

If they don't shitpost: no, they aren't.

The whole argument of attention-seeking only happens if someone replies to a tripfag claming he's ruining everything.

I'm surprised tripfags aren't more prevalent, considering modern "4chan culture" is all about pissing and shitting all over the floor and trying to pass it off as "trolling".

>>1553002
It's much more complex than that. For instance I'd say any tripfag who engages in debate without first dropping their trip is a complete faggot. Because they're bringing reputation shit into it otherwise.
and that's one reason people prefer anonymous communities because they don't have to usually deal with or see that sort of thing.

>>1552999
I was going to reply anyway, slow thread
>>1553000
So your "feeling" that /pol/ is reddit cancer is a fact now, /pol/ hasn't ruined 4chan, it's ruined /pol/ for a till summer ends.

If you can't back it up don't say it.

>>1553005
Or they drop the trip and reply positively to themselfs and shit stir etc.

>>1553006
>If you can't back it up don't say it.
My post was asking your to clarify what your even asking dipshit

But thanks for confirming my suspicion that you're just saying "lol prove it!" because you know that no matter what is said it'll never be good enough. That's literally the only reason anyone insists on "proof" when it comes to board culture.

File: shareblueandMATfags.jpg (370KB, 1256x1454px)

370KB, 1256x1454px

>>1553008
But it was i that ask for facts and you provided none.

I do know for a fact outside forces shill against /pol/ and say muh reddit and other terms to discredit them.

>>1553012
Fuck off newfag

>>1553029
t.buttblasted weeb

File: 1502168705799.jpg (162KB, 345x494px)

162KB, 345x494px

>>1552958
Go back

There is nothing wrong with tripfags, they add flavor to the boards.

>>1552966
Site always was normalfagville, and tripfags are still a problem on smaller boards like /k/ and /vp/
Also, everytime.

they're better than frogposters