What's the point of this, then?

there is nothing that can be done to save /a/ because everybody older than 18 stopped posting there years ago

go back there

>>1539977
It's for the newcomers, you can' really expect users with 5 years or more to bend over to a random sticky.

>>1539989
>you can' really expect users with 5 years or more to bend over to a random sticky.
Why not? What does enforcement have to do with how long someone's been on a board? Neither the rules nor the sticky have any kind of "seniority" stipulation. (And there would be no way to implement it if there were.) They apply to everyone.

Anon you dont need to get so triggered over some fish

>>1540083
There's that fucking word again. It's up there with "board culture" as some imagined excuse for violating rules.

Show me where in the rules (or the sticky) where it says rules are null and void just because someone invokes the word "triggered."

>>1540087
Theres a reason why people are calling you triggered

>>1540081
Those users are used to not have the rules being enforced, just ocassionally. You'll notice that even after rule enforcement they still shitpost or find ways to bypass rules just to make the same threads and keep the status quo.

>>1540144
>Those users are used to not have the rules being enforced, just ocassionally.
That's the problem. It shouldn't continue this way, but rather start enforcing the rules all the time and get them used to it.