In the defense of generals

Hi. It seems like you are misusing the quotation function. Oops! But don't worry, despite your act of faggotry, I can walk you through this situation. The green arrows, as some call it, are supposed to be used as a quoting mechanism. Whatever you write in the misused form of greentexting, you can also write with normal formatting. Alternatively, you could use typography bullets instead of green arrows. Thank you for reading and please always make sure you're not misusing the quotation function.

File: 1435771329858.gif (945KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

945KB, 500x500px

>>1531857
The default state is that each thread has its own unique topic; they are, after all, made by different users. It is practical and convenient to have discussion of a particular subject in one thread, but it is in no way essential because each thread may have its own specific question or concern regarding a subject. In truth, it is not of anyone else's concern if you wish to have your own thread.

If you like the perks of anonymity then you would very much be inclined to favour dealing with fanbases of all kinds. Discussion and post quality inevitably deteriorates in generals, hence you should be opposed to a deliberate split of a board's demographic into recognizable parts(which would consequently lead them to become isolated, only visited by people who have a tolerance for the state of the threads) if you are a good poster(person). If a user makes shitty posts in one thread then he will most likely make shitty posts in another.

I guess the OC part is true.

If you are a good poster you would in normal cases ignore shit you don't like. I don't see why this is used as an argument in favour of generals when it should be regarded as common sense.

Who are you quoting?

File: 1502493213199.png (169KB, 626x689px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 626x689px

>>1532421
I see that bot-lol.

I see that...

File: 1502229970967.png (73KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 184x184px

>>1531857
>generals literally done nothing wrong
>>>/vg/186023167
Please, I dare you to actually defend Slablands general.

A general made 3 years ago for a "game" that was made out of spite of another porn text game.
A "game" that has gotten at most an hour and a half of content in the 3 years it has been developed.

Seriously look at it, +400 post made from from 39 unique IPs; nobody talks about the game; the only thing keeping it afloat are the anons bump spamming it out of Page 10 and posting images of completely unrelated 2hu characters and Monster Girls.

You could't defend this shitty general even if your lives depended on it.

>>1532480
well it was created by the board

>>1531857
>don't have to deal with the fanbases you don't like unless you enter said general
that's like saying a war that takes place in one country has no effect on the countries around it

>>1532539
shit comparison