why is nu-/qa/ full of blogshitters

Is that a 4chan board?

>>1519217
It's a spinoff with a similar mod team as the rest of 4chan, yet bares no relation with the rest of the site.

imagine being this butthurt https://desuarchive.org/qa/search/text/nu-/
(sorry to see you grouped in there, akari cuteposter!)

>>1519220
thanks for your concerns based concern bro

Why are newfriends obsessed with the prefix/buzzword ``nu-''?

>>1519224
doesnt answer my question. please stay on topic

TERM "BLOGSHITTER" NOT FOUND PLEASE DEFINE

its also full of circlejerking as well

someone tell me where ``this" style of quoting came from

Like, what the fuck, dudePAL...?

>>1519277
Please not this nonsense again.

Read the original ASCII specification. It has nothing to do with fonts or how people drew glyphs. Granted many developers drew them this way, but it was because it was more aesthetically-pleasing.

ASCII only had seven bits to work with so some characters carried multiple meanings. I never see people complain when - is used as both a hyphen and a minus, or when people use it in place of the Unicode hyphen/minus/dash characters.
` was defined as both LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK and GRAVE ACCENT. `This' and ``This'' are the proper quoting methods in ASCII. They pre-date TEX and /qa/ and wherever else you may have seen them crop up.

Typing 'this' is equivalent to using parentheses )like this) instead of (like this). If you're so obsessed with symmetry, use the Unicode quote characters (‘ and ’, “ and ”). Don't do 'this' then preach me to me when I use characters correctly.