Warosu enters the blackmail business

And yet he still hasn't fixed the captcha...

>The removed content is measured via “Content packs”. Content pack is a unit of content measurement which is equal to not more than 20 pictures or 60 minutes of video or 2000 words. For example, one Content pack can consist of: 10 pictures + 15 minutes of video + 500 words. Price for the removal of one Content pack is $69.

How slimy.

>>1500643
A policy allowing only those willing to pay to decide what should and shouldn't be censored. A flawed system. But the one this planet's people have taken a liking to. The only applicable way to enforce such a policy is to have the price unaffordable by any entity.

archived.moe guy is doing it too. On the randomarchive.com one he has removed all subtlety:
>If a post contains personal information, then you need to visit NotDMCA.Net.

https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/6ksgvt/la_found_nude_photos_of_cousin_online_with_full/
>I contacted the admin of the website explaining the situation (including the fact that she is likely underage in the photos, as she recently turned 18) and asking for the photos to be removed from the site.
>He replied with an email stating that he would not remove the photo unless I did one of the following:
>Submitted an official DMCA takedown request and included the reference number.
>Pay an agency (he mentioned NotDMCA.net) to perform a takedown service without proof of ownership.
>Pay him a "donation" of 0.06 BTC.
wew

>>1500672
This is good. If people want to censor things they ought to pay a price for it. This will quickly narrow down people's wish to censor others to what they truly care about. Which surprisingly may be very little.