What's wrong with emoticons? XD

>>1496259
oh fugg :DD

if you use them you are failing to conform to what the circlejerk wants you to, therefore i have won the argument

I think :3 is cute when used sparingly

They're redundant when you could use a whole image to portray any sort of mood you have.

>:3

>>1496658
Reaction images are redundant because you can use emoticons to portray any sort of mood you have.

File: 58f.jpg (103KB, 907x718px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 907x718px

>>1496667
>What is 4chan?
>4chan is a simple image-based bulletin board
>image-based

File: 1343045407837.png (151KB, 318x318px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 318x318px

>>1496667
What's the emoticon for "smug girl"?

>>1496680
You realize this conversation exemplifies how thoroughly you can't think for yourself, right.

"They're redundant when you could use a whole image to portray any sort of mood you have." This doesn't actually prove emoticons to be wrong, since you went contrary to criticizing emoticons for their own merits to instead fall back on the cushion of majority opinion on 4chan, so well done there. Then as soon as someone flipped your shit argument on its head to prove how shit it is, without actually calling you an impertinent insecure piece of shit, you fall back on the archetype moot pulled out of his urethra.

So literally instead of criticizing emoticons (since you can't) you just said in different words "conform to the majority", then "conform to the site's infrastructure". But neither criticize emoticons in themselves, since you went contrary to emoticons to ride the dick of the majority, then moot. Very intellectual. Ebin.

>>1496681
I'm afraid to post it because I think Lenny is still on autoban.

>>1496681
,':^)

>>1496787
What about "Good evening everyone "?

>>1496792
Aww, my emoji.

>>1496792
>>1496793
Emojis are just as cancerous.

>>1496767
thats pretty good