Is low effort baiting the most cost efficient?

>>1486474
Explain the cost differance between low effrort posts and high effort baiting posts

>>1486505
You have to put in more for elaborate trolling.

is this bait?

>>1486550
Le bait fish ;P

File: 1501260145642.jpg (115KB, 678x325px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 678x325px

Yes, but if that's all you ever use nobody will really remember you anyways, nor will you particularly look back on any of them. It needs at least on some level some sincerity in creation, or you will mostly only recieve the same tired and weak responses from others.

Which in turn leads to the greater question of why bother at all?

>>1486558
>why bother at all?
For those sweet, sweet (You)'s

>>1486558
>Which in turn leads to the greater question of why bother at all?
t. instigator

Where was the screen cap taken? I want to see the context.

>>1487076
I treat all my (You)'s equally

It's more a problem of the target than a problem of your own

>>1487100
>>>/wsg/1801336

One of the signs of the internet plunging in quality when hordes of kids on smartphones came onto it. You don't even need to try in order to do this, not that I would ever do it personally.
Hell, people made a set of images (bait fish) specifically meant to reply to shitty troll posts. What is that even supposed to mean?

>>1488738
It's supposed to be a warning for all the retards to not to fall for it and feed the troll.

>>1488734
oh well wsg is one of those "visitor" boards

(You)s from boards like /v/, /pol/ and /vg/ worth less than 1 point.

>>1489593
t. fag

>>1489599
Oh shit, I got uncovered

>>1489615
haha, fag.

>>1489615
what a fag