Why using tripcodes without reason is not a bannable offense?
Everyone who uses one has a reason; you just don't like some of them
get rekt virgin
>>1483730
Which tripfag destroyed you in an argument?
Why do autists get so assblasted over tripcodes?
They've been a feature of 4chan, futaba, 2ch, and dozens of other forums for centuries.
If m00t, Hir0, whoever wanted to get rid of them, all they would have to do is comment out maybe 3 lines of code.
>>1483783
Because /b/tard "culture" won in the end.
>>1483791
blame Shii
Trips and names are good but only when people use it for a reason, not for attention like >>1483802
>>1483818
>he doesn't know
>>1483821
It was never required that you have a "reason" to tripfag.
Anonymity was supposed to encourage "shy" lurkers to post, in contrast to "forced identity" forums like Usenet.
Whether you want to be a namefag, tripfag, SECURE tripfag, or anonymous is up to each poster.
>>1483947
Can't you at least sage?
>>1483961
But I'm not the tripfag...
>>1483947
>He STILL doesn't know.
>thinking there is ever a reason to use a tripcode
why isn't being a newfag a banable offense?
stay on /bant/ retards
I don't hate tripcodes, just most of the people who use them, they post exactly like anons, don't contribute, but decide to attach something to their posts to be recognisable and it screams attention whore.
>>1483730
Just don't read them
>>1483783
>Why do autists get so assblasted over tripcodes?
Because they fucking ruin general threads and often convince mods to break board culture.
Why was tripfagging more common in 4chan's earlier days?
red
>>1483730
If using tripcodes was bad, moot wouldn't have done it.
>>1484504
Maybe you should stop posting in general threads.
I just filter all tripfags/namefags/pass owners