/qa/ is letting my threads die..
>>1475099
make better threads then
>>1475101
I made two really good threads last time!
>>1475104
try making great threads instead!
>>1475099
I'm trying out the strategy that the bot wants people to use and all it's doing is letting the low level shitposting float to the top while the threads that require thought get burried.
If you want to get past 5threads
Go into your router, change your MAC address, clear your cookies.
>>1475110
Isn't that like hella illegal on 4chan?
>>1475122
it's only breaking the rules if they catch you doing it
>>1475124
But you already know that I'm scared of those kinds of things.
>>1475110
Bumping good threads is a good thing, bumping the entire board every hour while not even deleting your bumps is not.
>>1475152
I believe that if you're going to be deceptive then you have to go all the way and if you're trying to be honest then you must be as transparent as possible.
>>1475203
That's not an excuse for disrupting the index view, thread watchers, sorting by last reply, and probably other things.
>>1475152
Why does it matter if one deletes their own bumps or not?
ITT rulebreakers make excuses they think justifies their rule-breaking.
>>1475232
Because then there are no posts to read on the front page.
>>1475211
You see Ivan...He explained his reasoning here >>1475232 which is legitimate.
>>1475232
Because not deleting the bumps is much more disruptive to the processes by which people find threads with new replies.
Which is not to say that bumping the whole catalog at max speed for hours on end would be acceptable if you deleted your bumps, but not deleting them makes it worse.
What threads did you make?