Is it true that if a thread gets enough reports it autoprunes?

>>1471298
I've heard that before too but I don't know if it's true.

>>1471300
It would make sense. If the public verdict is that the thread is shit, it should be automatically deleted.

>>1471303
Agreed, but the threshold for pruning might be a high number of reports. Only mods know how many. It might even be different on every board.

>>1471298
>dumb frogposter doesn't even know basic things
really makes you think

I tried testing it before
I once reset my IP just to report an off topic thread on one of the shittier boards where mod action is much slower like 20 times and it never disappeared until like an hour or so later (which was likely by a mos's hand) so unless the threshold for it is like 50 reports it's a lie.

>>1471298
No, why would it?

>>1471303
If the public verdict is that the thread is shit, it would die from inactivity without the need for an autoprune.

>>1471328

>If the public verdict is that the thread is shit, it would die from inactivity without the need for an autoprune.

Literally how fucking new are you

>>1471298
No. That would mean if you have enough proxies you could 404 any thread you want.

File: 1499066339174.jpg (7KB, 217x232px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 217x232px

>>1471337

That was suggested here, but it's a bad idea. Mods can probably sort by number of reports anyway.

File: 1481167189098.gif (85KB, 480x600px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 480x600px

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority

>>1471365
*doesn't click*

Saged and downvoted

>>1471418
Your ignorance is why i'm disappointed in you.

File: 7622821f64798e0c7d4c9cb49713acf3.png (633KB, 700x990px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 700x990px

>>1471343
Welcome to 4chan...
You're either with us or against us and image macros and catchphrases determine our opinions.

>>1471430
suck my cock dude