Is monarchy the superior form of government? Modern countries

>>1453117
>Is monarchy the superior form of government?
Yes, but a system can only do so much when bad people are running it. Consider the limitations of any system when run by 'bad' people.

>>1453117
>What if the success of you and your whole bloodline is bound to the success of your country?
yeah, totally, because a kid born into royalty without facing hardships or understanding the economy and all he knows is what someone tells him about it and reading books about it is fit to rule when he grows up

really, the greatest form of rule is an eternal entity that doesn't need a successor,but understands the plight of the common people and understand them, and this entity must not be able to be overthrown for nefarious purposes, i'd want to say an advanced computer, but sci-fi movies have taught us that's a bad idea

>>1453171
>really, the greatest form of rule is an eternal entity that doesn't need a successor,but understands the plight of the common people and understand them, and this entity must not be able to be overthrown for nefarious purposes, i'd want to say an advanced computer, but sci-fi movies have taught us that's a bad idea
Something like the helios ending from Deus Ex would be ideal

>>1453117
Yes, just check Equestria. it is ruled by two princesses and you never heard of any case of corruption in Equestria. Really makes you think.

>>1453171
>the greatest form of rule is an eternal entity that doesn't need a successor,but understands the plight of the common people and understand them, and this entity must not be able to be overthrown for nefarious purposes
Isn't that basically God

>>1453200
it would be but he only cares about the jews

File: a.jpg (42KB, 439x427px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 439x427px

Monarchy is dice rolling. >>1453171 is a better one.

>>1453117
Please fuck off to >>>/his/, /qa/ doesn't exist for any random topic. /his/ exists for topics such as political philosophy.

Fucking sage.

>>1453228
lmao yes it does