Why do some anons bump dead threads?
>>1437959
Many different reasons.
Yet for some reason people still fall for manipulative people's antics and just outright give up their activities when questioned...
Do humans really lack the determination in their actions? The lack of will to persevere even if it makes you hated?
>>1437961
weeb mafioso detected.
Notice how he picked three non-weeb threads when there are 120 weeb shitposting threads in the catalog that get bumped by the bumpbot.
>>1437966
Because everyone who disagrees with your agenda is a weeb, weeaboo, butthurt kraut, /jp/ spinoff user, liberal, libtard, /ota/, spinoff raider, /a/, /jp/, and therefore is part of the so called 'weeb mafia'.
>>1437961
>he picks 3 /qa/ heritage threads out of all the garbage on the board
8/10
>>1437970
I sometimes make a post in a thread and before I go to bed and don't check it for maybe hours later but I still respond if someone replied to me.
>>1437975
Because you literally are part of the weeb mafia. Now go back to your fucking spinoff you infernal weeb. This isn't your personal 2D Random board.
>>1437979
Prove it. Prove that I'm a weeaboo. Prove it or you're just blowing it out off your ass.
>>1437979
This board is whatever the people want it to be.
> This isn't your personal 2D Random board.
Oh but it is fufufu~
>>1437986
>What if one day they stop respond to you? What will you do then?
I think I'll manage somehow.
>everyone is tired of it except two or three lunatics
Hopefully the person I'm responding to is one of the other lunatics then!
>I have no arguments let's spam some image macros
"Might makes right"
>>1438057
1 hour. You did it on purpose (-_-) imo threads on imageboards should die faster 12 h max. It's not blog site or ordinary forum where you build your internet monument. I don't like my posts stay like this, they should be in effect for a short time
>>1437959
Because it's a free country
>>1437959
I don't know
Bumping threads is a complex tactic I don't feel like discussing.
>>1438078
Do you seriously think imageboards are meant to function at the speed of boards like /b/ or /pol/? There's chat clients for that. When there's a sticky thread on a fast board it's completely unusable because the format does not support it.
Are you one of the freaksthat spam old threads to bump limit? It used to be the mlpol discordbros that did it, but lately it's one guy that's completely obsessed with doing it as he clearly takes great offense to them and will spend 1-3 hours straight doing it. And for what purpose? Because old threads offend him?
I dunno
>>1439124
>As I explained earlier I hate internet monuments
Then go to /b/ if you want a board that speed
>>1439124
I don't know whether to laugh or gasp at the complex you've developed over /qa/ after getting so utterly humiliated by such a small, unorganized group. It almost makes me smile to think how much control /qa/ has over your life without any conscious effort on its part.
But with /b/ and /pol/ as your main boards it's clear that I shouldn't pick on children.
>>1439127
I think you might be talking to a wrong guy
>>1439127
I just like /qa/ because it's has it original culture of crossposters. You can't have it anywhere on this site.
>>1439131
don't you believe that the people browsing FB/IG/SN fap threads on /b/ or /ptg/ on /pol/ are welcome here just because we share a site
>>1439136
>>1439137
>implying
>>1439144
nice /v/ro