Is this image sexualized?

>>1419266
No, t-b-q-h desu

Camel toe. The hand on the underside/inside of a thigh draws even more attention to an erogenous part of the body. It's very obviously sexualized.

In the eye of the beholder, but I think most people who would save this image are the type of people to sexualize. A quick GIS reveals images of the same girl that are much more obviously sexualized. Also you can see her cooter.

>>1419266
Is this an anthropomorphic ("furry") image?

>>1419273
Take a wild fucking guess...

it's cute

>>1419266

>>1420043
I agree it's not very sexy but it sure is cute.

Post sexualized drawings of children onegai

File: 1496108260246.png (3MB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2000x2000px

Did we ever find the answer to this one?

>>1421964
Is THIS an anthropomorphic ("furry") image?

>>1419266

>>1419266

>>1422889
No.

>>1422889
Yes, weebspammers are furry-tier autists.