Unvirgin people should die.
They eventually will
>>1413957
A thread died for this but it was probably for the best.
we all will die.
What would realistically happen to the world if all of them suddenly died?
>>1414011
Suppose 98% of the workforce aged 20+ is non-virgin, which is a fair estimate.
So suddenly, everyone who is operating nuclear power plants, the nuclear armed submarines, airplanes, satellites, cars etc dies. The first thing you'd notice is cars, buses, trucks etc crashing into each other, falling from bridges, exploding etc. Then you'd see helicopters and airplanes fall from the sky. Then suddenly no more internet, satellites are now in orbit crashing against each other in a snowball effect that is destroying the entire satellite infrastructure. Some 10 to 20 minutes later the first power grids would be shut down. In a few hours, nuclear plants over the world would start blowing up and leak radiation all over. Within the timespan of a week, the lack of maintenance in factories, mines etc will have caused widespread fires, explosions etc. Buildings that were under construction would have lost all their integrity. In the timespan of a month there would be unprecedented food shortages because simply nobody would be producing food. Radiation would also have killed a lot people by now and radiation poisoning would be accelerating exponentially.
Most people who aren't virgins are basically children. The younger they are, the more likely they are to be virgins. Very few people are virgin beyond the age of 20, most of whom are very frail of mental and physical health so they depend completely on society. So out of the survivors, the first ones to die are likely new born babies (ages 1-4), and then wizards (20+ year old virgins), and the last ones would be kids/teen agers (5-19).
If you make a map of possible survivors on this post non-virgin Earth, the majority of still functioning human tribes would be those African child soldiers. They're young enough to be mostly virgins but bold enough to know how to kill and not be killed.
TL;DR: apocalypse.
>>1414043
>there would be unprecedented food shortages because simply nobody would be producing food
No there'd be plenty of non-perishable food for the survivors.
>>1414043
I kind of want that to happen.