Should females be allowed to be topless in public? If we gave

>>59961240
Yes and men should be allowed to rape them since they are presenting themselves in a way that invites intercourse.

Nah thats a sex spot on a woman and even gets erect when she's aroused.

only if they're attractive

>>59961240
How about everyone wear a shirt in public?

>>59961349
So do my nipples though, I'm a guy.

No that's something that while beautiful is still associated with sex and sex really doesn't belong in public. Also it would probably lead to more rape. The only case where I think it's fine is if it's breastfeeding preferably hidden by a jacket or something.

>>59961420
This

>>59961321
fagger

>>59961240
Lol at the cutting marks on the "girl's" left arm.

I'm completely in favor of women being allowed to show their sexy breasts in public.

>>59961321
Yes.

>>59961240
Also

>Those cut marks

>>59961240
Because women have sex organs on their chests. Holy shit, do we have to send these people to first grade sex ed or something?

>>59961420
This actually.
Why not? It would be best for all of us

>>59961240

No, because women do nothing but show off.

They should all be in burkas tbqhfam

>>59961349
>>59961518
>>59961763
/thread

>>59961240
this girl has so many cut marks on her. someone ucking just give her the pounding that she desperately needs. feminists crying about white males=they want to fuck chads

>>59961240
>my feminine hips

fml

>>59961321
EVEN IF A WOMAN WALKS AROUND NUDE, SMILES AT YOU AND LIES FLAT ON THE FLOOR WITH HER LEGS SPREAD AND "RAPE ME" WRITTEN WITH LIPSTICK ON HER BELLY, SHE'S STILL NOT ASKING FOR IT, SHITLORD

>>59961763
Men nipples are also sex organs.

>>59961697
Fuck you, you don't get to see my girlfriend topless.

File: 1451586335282.png (211KB, 450x253px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 450x253px

>>59961240

>>59961763
if i put penis in nipple do girl get pregent

File: 13330521689981.jpg (44KB, 500x430px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x430px

>>59961240

>Cut marks
>Soulless, dead eyes
>Unnaturally dyed hair

It's good that many women openly broadcast their mental damage

File: 1423654855525.jpg (3KB, 54x280px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 54x280px

>>59961659
Hurts just to look at 2bh

>>59961240
Answer to the OP pic is because female breasts are secondary sexual characteristics and are more erogenous than male nipples and breasts.

Women can't walk around topless just as men can't walk around without trousers and underwear on.

>>59961697
>sexy breasts
i have bad news for you, anon. this is not europe. all the topless women will be over-weight feminists

>>59961920
While we're at it, the guy has a cucked, defeated look his face.

>>59961240
none should be legal in public. we need some fuckin decency back in this shithole regressive society. put on a shirt, how fuckin hard is it?

>>59961892
It would be very painful

>>59961878
>Men nipples are also sex organs.
>AMERICAN EDUCATION EVERYONE

>>59961321
>nigger
not surprised

>>59961240
If they can handle the attention, sure.

If not no

>>59961240
If women want to give up part of what little sexual power they have over men, fine with me.

>>59961240
>Should females be allowed to be topless in public?

In my books a girl can whip out her tittes if she wants to

>If we gave them that right, do you think they would cry sexual harassment if a guy glances at their nips?

someone probably would but no one would take them seriously

>but I don't want my girlfriend walking around public topless

You are a cunt you need to share them tits with the world

go ahead post some pics

File: 1366361112291.jpg (27KB, 372x338px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 372x338px

>swedish males have almost no masculine features anymore
>females rightfully wonder why they can't show their nips if the bitch boys can

It is a valid question.

>>59961439
Breasts are actual secondary sexual characteristics and - if theories are to believed - developed solely as a substitute for the ass, that wasn't in our faces anymore when we started walking upright. So their sole purpose is to stimulate males to make them pursue the female, I guess that will be a bit risky to justify.
Though I personally wouldn't have much of a problem, really helps doing away with nasty surprises thanks to (wonder)bras.

I find the less I care what women do the better my life is.

File: MadotsukiVomit[1].jpg (105KB, 740x740px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 740x740px

>>59961659

No they shouldn't. And neither should men. Few people of either sex look good topless. Just keep your clothes on in public.

>>59961240
God damn they're both fucking hideous what the hell are they doing to these kids?

That boys body is not fucking normal wtf he would be so bullied in every school in stockholm no wonder he turned femenist i bet he only had girls as friends from sympathy jesus fucking christ i want to beat his weak little as shit

>>59961240

>only if they're okay with men looking at them in a sexual manner
>only if they're okay with an increase of women getting sexually assaulted
>only if they're okay with the "value" of women going down

If they're okay with that, then it's fine by me.

>>59961240
>Mass rape by refugees
>Honor killings
>Slavery
>Maquiladoras
...
Let's protest about public toplessness!

>>59961240
There's nothing I want more than some broad to talk about freeing the nipple in casual conversation with me so I can call her bluff and tell her to take her top off right now if being topless isn't a big deal.

>>59961439
Only some men have that, and it's a defect because men's nipples are left over from before their balls drop

>>59961240
lol she a cuter

Kek that "guy" on the left is so feminine, garuntee he's sucking refugee cock right now

Male pecs and female breasts aren't the same. Female breasts are sexualized and therefore inappropriate in public in a civilized culture. I wouldn't mind seeing tits everywhere (there's topless girls everywhere at raves and festivals and it's great) but this is a retarded argument implying they're equal.

Are the tits a sex organ or are they not?

If they aren't, then I should be allowed to grab a womens tits and it not be sexual assault, and they should be allowed to walk around topless.

>>59961920
Why is leftism so strongly associated with mental problems? Do ideas of equality resonate with those who are inferior to begin with? Or does leftist degeneracy erode one's mental health over time?

>>59961420
What about swimmers?

This is the only thing I agree with on feminists.
>>59961697
also this

File: U_better_not_be_maji.jpg (101KB, 640x636px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 640x636px

>>59961240
I can't believe I have to explain shame to two teenagers

>>59962249
That theory is bullshit. Breasts didn't develop for sexual purposes, they are mammary glands developed for feeding infants.

In primitive hunter gatherer cultures, no one gives a shit about breasts, usually they are either more interested in the ass or thighs. That's why the women walk around topless.

>>59961240
Both look absolutely hideous.

No one wants to see that.
They should be wearing a full beekeeper's suit at all times.

>>59961240
I don't know why you Americans are so weird about boobs.

If they want to be topless let them.

If you have trouble controlling yourself because some women is showing her boobs you should get yourself checked, that's called mental illness.

>>59961240
Breasts are sex organs. They have erogenous tissue in them which responds to sexual stimulation. Thus, they should be kept away with the other sex organs.

Besides, free hanging breasts without support will droop and sag in a few short years. Women that wear bras maintain their perkiness much much longer

>>59961240
Yes. They should also be allowed to walk around with no panties on. This is the only right thing to do.

#FreeTheBush

>>59962748
m8 you can't pat a girl on the shoulder without being charged for sexual assault

Purple hair, nose piercing, tattoos. That's why that pic is not ok. Mental health or degenerate to pol.

>>59961240
you fuckers miss the point completelly

feminists dont want breasts to stop being taboo

they want men to stop sexualising them

I cant imagine anything more evil than this

>>59962760
>Do ideas of equality resonate with those who are inferior to begin with?
This one, I think. Ideas of traditional roles and strong masculine and feminine figures make the mentally ill squirm.

>>59961873
Her body language is telling me to shove my dick in her.

File: toplessapes.jpg (96KB, 500x381px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 500x381px

>>59962819

don't care.

File: image.png (291KB, 392x574px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 392x574px

>>59961240
As long as men's primary motivator for fucking is appearence, then I would say its probably not a good idea for women to go topless.

Inb4 "train men not to rape :^)"

>>59961878

>Fuck you, you don't get to see my girlfriend topless.

Most guys probably have already

>>59962748
Go grab a random mans tits.

The only reason it won't be sexual assault is because he's not going to press charges on someone he just sent to the hospital.

>>59962955
That's the beauty of this. Exploit this situation. Get the government to legalize women walking the streets with their shirts and panties off.

By the time feminists realize men just legalized it so we can see their tits it will be too late.

>>59962991
White women confirmed for best tits

File: 1451296350509.png (193KB, 363x373px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 363x373px

>>59961240

WHY DO I HAVE TO HIDE MY BALLS?

>>59962819
Then why do they have erogenous tissue in them?

If no one gave a shit about breasts, there would be no evolutionary pressure to keep them big and well shaped. It is not advantageous for a woman to walk around with large fatty udders hanging off her chest, the only reason they evolved this way is:
A) Ability to provide for the young
B) Sexual selection

>>59962819
You sure it isn't because breasts are an important part of child rearing so seeing if your mate has good breasts off the bat is important to them?

>>59961240
Should they be allowed to, yes?

Will they if allowed, probably not.

Boyfriends don't want to lose something they get the right to over everyone else (seeing dem titties). Women will notice even less eye contact, complain to men (like they always do) and some men will attempt to not look, but ultimately it is an impossible behavior to ditch. Women will also lose some power they have over men, just in a general sense. Half the fun of flirting with a woman is getting to see her naked. Also some women's tits suck and other women walking around topless is a huge disadvantage to them.

So lets just pretend this became the norm for like 10 years. After that time, you'd see "I need feminism because I shouldn't have to walk around topless".

>>59962748
This is it. Can't have it both ways. I'm honestly confused beyond anything else by this European obsession with being able to hang tits out.

>>59962819
He's not saying that 'breastfeeding' was invented for sexual purposes (all mammals do it) rather he is referring to the fact that human females have constantly swollen breasts. This is a unique feature - dogs, cats, ape females all have breasts the get enlarged when they produce milk and then shrink to normal (with slight stretching). Humans are unique in that we have big useless tits constantly. I can assure you based on every magazine cover/clickbait youtube image that nice tits are hardwired to appeal to human males regardless of lifestyle.

>>59961240
It's legal in some cities for example jew york

>>59962819
But why don't all mammals have constantly enlarged mammary glands?

File: flash_horror.jpg (51KB, 743x760px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 743x760px

>>59961240
What the fuck? Is that supposed to be a man on the left? I'm blond and blue eye'd myself but this faggot should kill fucking himself for literally looking like a vagina.

>>59962515

That boy.. is you.

>>59963238
Not to forget no girlfriend who actually values a relationship wants to see their boyfriend staring at other peoples tits all the time.

File: women01.jpg (76KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 640x480px

>>59961240
When cunts stop using tits to get what they want and displaying them for sexual currency they can stop being covered.

Alternatively, if you want to live like a fucking primitive go to Africa or some deep dark jungle and enjoy your mud huts and subsistence agriculture bitch.

No, most tits are disgusting and should not be out in the open

File: 573.jpg (43KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x375px

>>59963435
Backtits are still legal

>>59962796
Why does having a dick remove shame from the nipples?

>>59961240
Nah. Topless girls are more disgusting than topless boys.

No homo.

>>59962881
>If you have trouble controlling yourself because some women is showing her boobs you should get yourself checked, that's called mental illness.
It's not a mental illness to be aroused when presented with a sexually alluring figure. People walking around topless would both erode the value of intimacy and distract people during their day-to-day activities.

>>59963675
>it's not ok because in our society we have something called shame. for that reason these kids are wearing pants.

File: 1451831187566.gif (3MB, 448x336px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 448x336px

Because it's haram.

>>59961240
They won't ever do it it's a very minority viewpoint.
Even if they did it wouldn't last a year because they would get cold and put something on over it, tits were not made to he out in the open

File: tittyfoot.jpg (26KB, 420x560px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 420x560px

>>59963435
so you don't like this?

File: pettanko.png (360KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 600x600px

>>59963675
Because men's nipples are non functional. They are not a secondary sexual organ as the breast is in women.

>>59961240
Pic related is rather funny.
That girl looks manlier than that guy does.

>>59963794
is futurama the most red pilled show ever?

It all depends on the context really.
I'm fine with nudism and topless beaches but that sort of thing doesn't belong in city centers.

>>59963757
But a man could go outside topless. Especially so at someplace like beach. A woman would be shunned and shamed for that.

>>59963800
No, they kind of were made to be out in the open.
Only Humans cover them.

>>59963723
It's normal to be aroused, you can also be aroused by non naked women, that's normal.

However if you can't control yourself enough to not jump on her and fuck her like a filthy nigger, that's mental illness.

>>59961240
why are women trying so hard to be not attractive?

as if dyeing your hair and wearing clown makeup wasn't enough now you want to let your titties hang out like abbo niggers who don't even know what lightbulbs are to the eventual goal of what, having men not get sexually excited by looking at you? What is the feminist endgame?
Do they have an endgame?
>implying women plan for the future

>>59963419
indeed

>>59961240
>Don't objectify women
>Objectify women
Pick one

>>59963972
That's a reductio ad absurdum fallacy. Exposed sexual organs would distract people significantly, even if they don't act on their urges. In fact, not acting on them may keep them more distracted, as they would potentially spend long periods of time in states of arousal with no release.

>>59963888
Why not?

>>59964011
They want someone to slap them, tell them they're wrong and to be controlled by a strong man

>>59963914
Because she has secondary sexual organs on her chest.

As a male I do enjoy walking about topless 90% of the time though. Fuck clothes. I'm sitting naked on a towel right now.

File: tfwnocrusade.png (294KB, 388x405px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 388x405px

It's just another Chesterton's fence. There's no single, objective reason why female nipples should be more lewd than male ones but there's no single objective reason to remove the societal norm either, apart from mindless EVERYTHING MUST BE EXACTLY THE SAME AND EQUAL IN ALL CASES dogmatism. Women's breasts are an erogenous zone and they have absolutely nothing to gain by pushing this.

>get rid of this minor double standard that harms nobody
>the next thing is 'well why do we cover up genitals it's just nature LOL'
>end up with absolutely no seperation between our public appearance and what we show those we're intimate with
>literally living like animals
>for some reason this is a good thing

File: 15941479198_827ecc0b45_k.jpg (1MB, 2048x1371px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1371px

>>59964288

Because nudism and topfreedom should be recreational, not 'the standard'.
It is also not very civilized, like some of the other blokes have pointed out.

>>59962228
>no one would take them seriously
Remember when the entire feminist mouvement was a joke, well it's still is, but only of /pol/. People are actually believing that shit, and your kids will grow up tolerating it whether you want it or naah. never underestimate the stupidity of people.

>>59962905
seriously ?? how do you define a sexual assault ?

>>59961763
>Because women have sex organs
The last time I checked, Breasts were not involved in sexual reproduction. If you've found otherwise, there's a Nobel Prize in medicine awaiting you.

>>59962761
pretty sure wearing something that restricts movement of your boobs is better than free nippling it

having your boobs flop around would create a lot of drag in the water

>>59961240
Why is it okay to complain about not having the right to show your tits when wars erupt left and right and innocents die, poor people die of cold and malnutrition when we largely have the ability to help them...

Are those so-called feminists blind?

>>59964179
Are you a nigger?

In europe there's tits everywhere and nobody cares.

>>59964760
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nipple_stimulation

>>59964727
>Sexual assault is any involuntary sexual act in which a person is coerced or physically forced to engage against their will, or any non-consensual sexual touching of a person.
Basically any touching they don't like.

>>59961240
woman can be topless in public in my city. mostly dikes during gay parade, hippy fests, and about ten years ago punk rockers spare changing

Isn't this answer obvious?

Jesus fuck.

>>59964760
they are intended to feed babies, how is that not part of reproduction?

>>59964848
I was meaning more for men, men take their shirts off for swimming the majority of the time.

Why can't I have my balls out?

>>59964906
Europe is also in the process of importing millions of violent and aggressive foreigners. Should North America do that too?

>>59961240
Quite frankly, this sort of thing doesn't matter. It's not a herald of the end of Western Civilization if they are allowed. It's not some tragic human rights atrocity if they aren't.

People in the first world get bent out of shape over bullshit non-issues like this way too much.

>>59965053
That's separate from the transmission/reception of germ line cells/gametes involved in the "sex organs" proper, i.e. vagina/uterus/womb and such.

>>59963119
Japanese girls would like a word with you.

>>59961240
i don't recall men walking topless on the street either.

thread theme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO7OLE_OK1s

>>59961240

I'm fine with women being topless personally, I see boobs all the time.

>>59964727
>>59964929
Or maybe it was sexual harassment, can't remember which.
I remember it from some case where an asian business man pat his female employees on the shoulder (which is normal in his culture, it's a way of boosting morale there) and got sued for sexual harassment/assault/whatever.
Basically, don't touch people you aren't already friendly with unless they make it clear they're ok with it.

That would really ruin things for traps. Traps love gender specific shit like wearing bras, and I could really see that taking away another motive for their crossdressing.

>>59961240

they are allowed here, spoilers no one does

>>59961240
Damn the women on the left is one hell of a cutter.

>>59961240
Men's breasts aren't erogenous zones.

>>59961878

>he doesn't want men to fuck his girl but never get the chance
>he's so insecure that his girl will leave him for the first guy that oggles his girl's tits.

Gotta get over this sempi, if men don't want to fuck my girl, she must look like shit.

>>59961240
i don't get that image

why is left female ok, but right is not?

File: 1438032828907.jpg (151KB, 771x928px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 771x928px

>>59961240
> why is this okay when this is not?

Well the specimen on the right has tattoos, a cattle nose piercing, violet hair, no chin and of course a shitload of cuts.

Oh wait, you're talking about tits.

>>59965053
The nipples are also connected directly to the clit so when you stimulate the nipples, the labia gets goosebumps.

Try it on your girlfriend if you have one or yourself if you are a grill

>>59965247

are they going to ask him where to find some tits?

>>59965241

You're an idiot.

>>59962760
Because those who are unable to command respect demand it to be given to them.

>>59961240
I could've sworn those were both women... C'mon, Sweden. Jesus Christ.

>>59966215
Really Hoser, is that the best you can do? No explanation of your premise, just running your mouth like a fucking dindu. Too bad about that faggot you have for a leader, huh? We have Emperor Trump incoming, while you are cucked.

File: Osatsonu6desukun.png (286KB, 423x349px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 423x349px

>>59961659

>>59962114
No! Don't let this ignorant anon represent us!

This is common bullshit "TV science" that people see on Discovery channel and shit.

>>59961240

>women showing tits in public all the time

lol, you wish....

>>59961240
They are allowed to be topless on the beach. On street level everyone should wear a shirt, I thought this was a norm by now.

>>59966603
You're so kawaii, portubro.

>>59961240

If topless was legal, then all the sloppy tittied fat lazy slobs will skip wearing a top..

Girls with nice tits will still be clothed.. why?
1) They aint giving that shit away free, &
2) don't need to comments and stares.

So, the law is in place to keep ugly shit from being ugly shit.

>>59961240
Lel sexual sensory cues in Homo sapiens sapiens. Why do kittens paw at fish tanks?

>all those self inflicted cuts
I don't think feminism is the exact issue in this picture

File: download.jpg (80KB, 608x455px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 608x455px

>>59961240
Of course.

In any civilized country, it is seen as right and proper for women to walk around with exposed breasts.

>>59961240
Sure, why not?

>>59964760

>nipple stimulation

>Brain produces oxitocine
>Men are biologically attracted to them.
>Promotes bonding between couples
>only species that grows boobs after puberty
>erogeneous zone with big sexual stimulation

Kek

File: Ajanta painting.jpg (232KB, 867x944px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 867x944px

>>59966921
This is an ancient Buddhist painting from 1500 years ago in India. These people had writing, sophisticated philosophy, and invented shit like the concept of zero. And the women were topless. This came before the "poo in loo" savagery of post Islamic conquest modern India.

File: 1443101048579.jpg (78KB, 319x307px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 319x307px

This is merely the beginning. After they are allowed to walk around with bare boobies they will complain about men looking at them oddly or in a sexualized manner and after men stop staring at them they will complain that men are no longer staring at them. Women will somehow manage to find something even more insignificant to bitch about, because bitching is literally the only thing this generation of women is good for. They dont even give birth anymore ffs. Cant we just shoot them already?

>male chest
Attractive if fit, funny if fat and the guy wont be offended

>female breast
Might be attractive look, but the odds are really fucking slim, most of the time they look like garbage so you would probably laugh at chick for showing them

I am pretty sure that 99% of all women dont even want to show their tits because they all have disgustingly looking sand sacks hanging from their chest.

File: capt.sri10209151139.india_kashmir_pope_protest_sri102.jpg (70KB, 379x223px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 379x223px

>>59961321
They are already being raped in Europe, without topless.

File: 1c353fefab75d1c54f0a5f93f23ba5e8.jpg (75KB, 570x380px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 570x380px

>>59967407
you're right, a successful but forgotten 500 year old far eastern kingdom justifies western modern women going topless


>this is the aztec empire; they had art and writing, and they sacrificed virgin women to the sun god on top of a pyrmaid

fukin idiot

File: islamic_rage_boy.jpg (28KB, 400x219px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x219px

>>59967434
by Allah I would just slap them back to their senses, getting tired of this western feminism SHIT, i have 0 respect for worthless mentally damaged whores

>>59961240
>don't want my girlfriend walking around public topless.
So the only reason she doesn't flash her tits at every passing guy already is that it's illegal? Sounds like your relationship isn't going to last...

>>59963423
Muh dick..

>>59967577
>tfw muslims get a free-pass on killing degenerate white women just to speed up the white genocide

What is to become of this world, I wonder.

>>59967407
>blame your people shitting everywhere like animals on islam
lmaooooooooooo also, zero was invented independently in different regions including mesopotamia, retard

>>59967407
>Eastern philosophy
>sophisticated
O I am laffin

>>59961240
most pathetic excuse for a "man" i've ever seen

File: image.jpg (71KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 500x500px

>>59962023
I-I didn't realize they both weren't women. The one on the right just looks like a flat sullen butch

>>59961240
Sweden knows exactly why.

But their feminists are now telling their women to dress more modestly so they don't invite muslim rape. They've gone so full circle that they're eating themselves.

>>59967557
>fukin idiot
Sorry, but that predicate attaches to you. A fact is a fact: the post I replied to implied that only savage spearchuckers had barechested women, and a retort was in order.

Now, you are cordially invited to pound salt up your ass and fuck off.

>>59961240
People don't want to see saggy, pale tits desu senpai.

>>59961873
>unironical german opinion
nice, now let ahmed breed your gf

>>59967663
just have more kids with the decent white women, i'm sure they exist whats your problem are you some kind of degeneracy apologist?

File: Justice.jpg (140KB, 371x545px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 371x545px

>>59967577
GTFO mudslime

File: 1446008753411.jpg (151KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 768x1024px

I think it would be a little ridiculous for a woman to get arrested for having her tits out

>>59967740
Muslims are filthy trash though, as they wipe their asses with their fucking hands like the savages they are.

>>59961889
What the fuck is up with the word "objectify"?
Humans can be viewed as objects like any other organism.

>>59967816
Not at all, I just haven't seen a decent white girl in years.
Plus no decent woman wants an autistic guy.

>>59961873

And people wonder why germans don't reproduce, what a castrated cuck.

They both look like womyn

Fucking jews pussified the fuck out of your country Swedecucks

ABANDON SHIP

>>59961240
neither of them are "okay"
No Swedish boy should look so weak, holy fuck.
Do some push-ups or something.

Sure its ok with me. I mean topless schoolgirls is completely acceptable and natural too right?!
In fact genitalia is only flesh so why wear bottoms too.
Naked school girls all the way, yaaayyy for nature.

>>59967843
maybe not arrested. But a cop should throw a blanket over her and say "Come on now miss. Don't show us the menu if the kitchen is closed"

>>59967407
>sophisticated philosophy
Topkek

File: considerthefollowing.jpg (29KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x600px

Ask yourself the question: Why do we have any laws in the first place? I would answer

1. For a stable society
2. To prevent people from hurting or damaging others.

Are topless women a threat to our society? Do they hurt others with their vicious display?

I don't think so.

Women can walk around topless here but nobody actually does.

File: schopenhauer.jpg (113KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1024x768px

>>59967752
>Upanishads
>Vedanta
>Panini's Grammar, which influenced modern linguistics like Chomsky's grammar.

Schopenhauer called the Upanishads some of the greatest philosophy he'd ever read. I'll take his opinion over some random jackoff like you.

>>59968116
Are naked school girls a threat to society?

>>59968081
See >>59968175 you stupid fuck.

Who's laughing now?

Well, look at it scientifically. Over the past 2 million years, we have evolved all our behaviors and traits, including our mating behaviors.

This includes mating displays and our response to them.

Feminists want you to forget the science, that showing boobs means babies and sex and procreation *from an evolutionary standpoint* and men are evolved to respond to such visual stimuli. Seeing boobs means sex and sex means babies and thus the urge to procreate occurs.

This is evolution. It's all animals, not just us. Baboons react to seeing red asses. Peacocks to tails. It's just science.

And because the showing of female boobs is an evolutionary evolved mating display, it doesn't need to be casual visible indiscriminately like arms and elbows.

It's not denying equal rights. It's accepting science.

And only feminists and christian fundamentalists don't believe in evolution.

>>59966108

Kek

>>59966015
This picture is perfect proof of why men need to be in charge.

Its k. Its all natural anyways. Black tribes etc dont give a fuck. As long as people not grope eachoter randomly and shit ofc.

>>59961240
Women shame themselves. If all bitches tomorrow all of the sudden decided to walk around topless, hardly anyone would give a shit. I wouldnt, I got my own problems.

>>59968490
>I wouldnt, I got my own problems.
I would because their ugly tits would make me want to throw up. The average chick look fucking disgusting around that area.

if kids were exposed to nudity all thier lives, I don't think nerds would rape

but black men would still rape regardless, so i dont know

Swedes have never really had any problems with female nudity, so why the flag in the pic?

>>59961240
Why would women want to flop their tits about public like some mere barbarian?

>>59968203
Yes, they threaten to send people to jail.

>>59961240
Sure let the cunts devalue themselves even further by making their naked bodies even more accessible. They are already inferior to porn and a good internet connection, fuck'em. Yes they will still claim harassment and microagressions, just more often.

P.S. this is already legal in many states in the US.

>>59963689
Yes homo

File: 1449205113756.jpg (55KB, 694x575px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 694x575px

Show off your tits for all I care, then will you women finally stop complaining?
Neverending bitching and moaning.

>>59962098
hes a big goy

File: Holysjit.jpg (87KB, 640x633px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x633px

>>59961240
Jesus Christ
Mfw that is what is considered a "male" in Sweden

File: crazy achmed neckbeard.jpg (16KB, 300x221px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x221px

>>59969051
This is what's considered a male in Sweden.

File: image.png (555KB, 3300x3140px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 3300x3140px

>secondary sexual organs
>secondary

>>59968933
for jew

>>59968161
To be fair, you live in a frozen hellhole. Extreme cold and nudity don't mix well.

I would consider myself straight but im more sexually aroused over that "man", he seems a lot more girly than the female one

>>59961240
in some states they already can go topless like in new york for example.

>>59963237

Some anon will have to correct me if I'm wrong but I'm sure I read breast function in that regard is independant of size unless you're talking about girls with almost 0 boobs. It's mostly the tissue surrounding he nipple that is involved, the rest is fat. That's why fat girls tend to have huge racks.

>>59961240
Implying women would give up one of their deception tools, they'll want hold onto the ability of lying about the shape and size of their tits. Next they'll bitch about supposedly being forced to wear make-up.

>>59968821

I've been laughing at this pic for 3 minutes straight

File: whyanon.png (265KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 800x600px

>>59963377

He's just a young lag, m8. What do you want him to have, braids of chest hair down to his dick and a roided out physique?
You can tell from his shoulder to hip ratio he's just a young guy who's yet to get rid of his puppy fat probably because he's been told exercise is toxic masculinity.
Is /pol/ really this filled with angsty faggots lashing out at blue-pilled men who are probably only as unfit and unimpressive as most of pol is?

>>59961659
Just more proof these bitchs are nut cases..

I'm inclined to allow.
After a while the sight of a topless gal wears off.
Just like bikinis in the beach were an outrage way back when. Now it's mainstream.

>>59961240
>Nose piercing: check
>Stupid tat: check
>CMYK hair: check check

>>59971125
Maybe you have to be a little bit nuts to go against mainstream.
Also, living in society is a constant state of repression and frustration, sublimating into all the fuckups we see every day.
So, go ahead and cast that stone if you're "normal"

>>59971510

Logical conclusion? Different fashion sense. Yup. Amazing right?

File: US-Topless-Nudity-Laws1.png (70KB, 950x679px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 950x679px

Arent they allowed already in most states?

>>59961240
Most women wont want to anyway. They arn't really fighting for being topless in public, they are fighting for the de-sexualization of women and they are fighting a losing battle, always will be.

If they want to show their tits on social media let them, the only ones who will do it are fucking munters anyway. Won't be socially acceptable for them to be topless in public anytime soon though.

>>59971713
Different?
It's the same for all tumblrinas, you latinamerican weed man.

>>59968041
>Don't show us the menu if the kitchen is closed
High-dollar restaurants do this all the time.

Generally walking by, their menu is posted near the door and they might not open until 6:00PM.

>>59971770
Wait, what?

As a Texasfag, pretty sure topless would garner public indecency in pretty much every county.

>>59971782
Ever been to any mediterranean beach?
Totally accepted and nobody bats an eye.

>>59971956
Looking at it some more I guess you get arrested for disorderly conduct or whatever anyways

>misusing the flag
Herecy

File: image.jpg (101KB, 596x800px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 596x800px

So why are some questionably gory/horror movies restricted at age 6, but something as natural as a naked woman's body is age restricted at age 18. Handing a 15 year old boy pic related is illegal.

Christian puritanism?

>>59971713
>Different fashion sense
Take a look at her left arm. Shes a mess, nothing else. And her opinion fucking worthless.

>>59961240
Is there are version of that image with the nippes of the one on the left not covered?

File: download (5).jpg (11KB, 277x182px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 277x182px

>>59961240
I really would not give a shit if it were allowed but it would make them less attractive in my eyes.

Once you have played with enough titties and they are not that enthralling anymore when naked. I get aroused when they are covered up or propped up in a sexy way. I like my ladies wrapped up like a beautiful present that needs unwrapping.

If they didnt cover up I would see them in the same way I see rural spear chuckas

It's not OK for men to go topless in public unless it's at a pool or beach.

It's not OK for women to go topless in public.

So do they want to be able to go topless at the pool or beach, since that's the only exception? They can do it at the beach in Europe, so all that's missing is the pool, I guess.

>>59969828
This. And how often do you see women do this? Hardly ever.
Give women the right to be topless and they don't really care enough to take advantage of it, so having it outlawed doesn't make a difference.

>>59969486

Well they sure as fuck aren't primary.

File: no shirt.jpg (101KB, 634x912px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 634x912px

>>59973274
>It's not OK for men to go topless in public unless it's at a pool or beach.
And here I was thinking this was a good look for a job interview...

>>59961240
>Should females be allowed to be topless in public?

No, absolutely not.
Breasts are a part of sexual attraction. Hell the reason women have breasts is because of men selecting the larger breasted females specifically for procreation throughout our species history...
Why else do you think humans are the only apes with breasts?

They also can nourish your offspring. They are too personal to have exposed everywhere all willy billy like that.

Men should dress women for them because they can't be trusted to do it in a humble way by themselves.

>>59961240
>Should females be allowed to be topless in public?
Yes under the condition that they can't cry sexual harassment if they decide to go topless.

>>59961240
Now post the uncensored version.

>>59961240

Do the swedes want to get even more raped by niggers and allahu akbars?

>>59961873
Yeah, she pretty much is asking for it at that point.
>>59962819
And that is why the breasts evolved to look like an ass. Which is what he said.

>>59973679
Looks perfect for your interview at the gay club.

>>59961240
Neither of those are ok.

>>59963849
So what?

File: Yy8uMrL.jpg (19KB, 636x482px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 636x482px

>>59961240
The only type of women who will do this are the ones who don't have anything to lose for flashing their tits i.e. purple-haired feminazis. Even if you made it inoffensive people would still not want to see saggy knockers sometimes... that goes for both sexes

>>59961240
Nice gyno

The dude looks prettier than the junky cutter on the right.

>>59975665
Sauce on this semen demon?

>>59961240
In most US states it is

>>59971770
/thread

>>59961321
>muh dick

>>59961321
Damn, mate. Oh well...

You did this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thwujnUE_uI

>>59964910
>The practice may be performed upon, or by, people of any gender or sexual orientation.
literally the first paragraph

>>59961240

Can a woman rub a man's chest with out being charges with sexual assault?
Can a man rub a woman's chest with out being charged with sexual assault?

As long as tits are sexual in nature they should be covered.

>>59961240
In theory, it should be okay, otherwise it'd a double standard. In practice, the double standard exists and I wouldn't advise women to go around topless if they don't want to be harassed.

>>59976656
Read the whole article.

>The male or female breast, nipple and areola develop similarly in the fetus and during infancy. At puberty, the male's breasts remain rudimentary but the female's develop further, mainly due to the presence of estrogen and progesterone, and become more sensitive.

>Erect nipples can be a prominent indicator of a female's sexual arousal, and the female's sexual partner may, as a result, find this erotically stimulating.

>The stimulation of women's nipples promotes the production and release of oxytocin and prolactin.[3] During the stimulation of the nipples, large amounts of oxytocin are released, which would normally prepare women's breasts for breastfeeding. Besides creating maternal feelings, it also decreases a woman's anxiety and increases feelings of bonding and trust.[4][5]

>Some women can achieve an orgasm as a result of nipple stimulation.

>>59963794
That animation looks so unnatural. People get shocked in two frames and then stand still.

>>59968175
>le sad meme philosopher
>>>/lit/
You're no better than edgy teens that flail Nietzsche around everywhere.

Let them go topless, but don't yell "RAPE" if I look at your fucking tits bitches. God I hate women some times.

>>59961240
what is with the subliminal effemination and eroticism.

File: 1449015124026.gif (1MB, 245x280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x280px

>>59961240
Not only should we let them, but we should then encourage them to walk through non-white districts (because whitey so bad and all).

There should be no problems, because those non-whites already know that rape is not legal.

>>59967883
In this type of context. It is used as a derogatory term. As in, you see the person as less than human, or "just" as an object, and not a living breathing being.

Kind of dumb, but just explaining.

>>59961240


Fact is that in our culture tits are highly sexualised. If you want women to treat tits casually and as just part of the female aesthetic go live with some Amazon or African tribes.

Our laws should reflect our morals and values where it's sane to do so, and this is one of those times.

>>59961240
It's not illegal in most places in the US

If women are allowed to go topless, then they can't complain when they get looked at by others.

>>59969486
>he doesn't have a second penis
look at this fag

>>59961240
God look at the disgusting NuMale to the left, he's small, weak and skinny. Look at the resentment in his eyes. He knows he lost the genetic lottery, he knows that no girl will ever fuck him consensually, he's angry and bitter at his fate and has to take it out on anyone in a better position than him.

Now look at the women, you can tell she's mentally deranged, she belongs in an insane asylum for those cut marks alone. She's in the bottom 20% of unfuckable women. That not even the desperate NuMales will touch.

They both hate themselves and each other, but they hate happy normal people even more. They form a cabal to undermine and destroy everything that normal society stands for. Things such as their People, their Nation, their Race. If they cant be happy then noone can.

This is where feminism recruits, from the bottom barrel of society, with each generation getting progressively infantilized, more and more deranged degenerates are born into a crumbling society.

>>59961240
How 'bout you both wear shirts
The guy needs to workout too; almost has tits for god sake.

i jack off to topless female protesters. tits plus the fact that they think they can make a difference makes my dick so hard

>>59962991
Is the string around their boobs for running?

>>59961240
>Should females be allowed to be topless in public?
No, do you want to incur the wrath of God?

>>59961240
What a stupid movement

File: 1438974729551.jpg (84KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 500x667px

>>59964318
Sweden right for once.

>>59965139
You responded to a Canadian...

>>59961240

Women should be allowed to piss in urinals too.

Oh wait.... biological differences....

File: 1439815939288.png (297KB, 500x340px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 500x340px

>>59982411

>>59964318
This is the only answer. No joke. They're tsundre, senpai~

File: 1451748970389.jpg (2KB, 125x124px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x124px

>>59963057

>>59966015

> Why we should kill woman?
> Ans: that pic

>>59961240
Imagine all the boners that would be popped.

Then women would call sexual harassment. "He's clearly sexualizing me, your honor! Just look at that bulge!"

But of course it would not be sexual harassment for the woman to look at the bulge.