CLIMATE CHANGE FAGGOT ON SUICIDE WATCH

File: sanders11.jpg (42KB, 594x396px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 594x396px

Cucks on suicide watch

File: obamaheckled.jpg (29KB, 582x404px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 582x404px

>Dyson

Not a climatologist so his opinion is obviously worthless.

>>53769785
>Dyson
>Known for Dyson Sphere
>Alien Megastructure on /sci/ and /pol/
>Climate Change faggot
>Ayy LMAO hype slained

>>53769937
so lets just trust 6,000,000 worthless shitbag journalists and politicians instead

muh 6 gorillion scientists agree

File: orionorbiting.gif (59KB, 432x289px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 432x289px

>you will never travel to the stars on a nuclear butt plug why live

File: 1442982168893.jpg (25KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 499x499px

CLIMATE CHANGE ACTUALLY GOOD

OH GOD DAMN BERNIE CONFIRMED MOST RETARDED ELDERLY JEW ON THE PLANET

OH GOD DAMN

>>53769937
>climatologist

>>53769785
Sadly, that does not mean "better crops". Tests in controlled conditions have found crop plants (wheat, I think, iirc) grows more plant, but the grains are less nutritious.

File: atmospheric_spectral_absorption[1].png (137KB, 509x411px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 509x411px

>>53769785
CO2 wouldn't be the problem anyway, wheter climate change is real or not

>>53769937
>climatologist
Am I a shipost scientist yet?

File: 0987967890.jpg (22KB, 488x366px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 488x366px

>>53769785
>MORE CO2 IN THE AIR = MORE PLANT GROWTH AND SPECIES PRESERVATION
You've got to be absolutely retarded in regards to Ecology or an energy shill to believe this nonsense in literal context. There is a limit and we have surpassed it.

>>53772621
So by how much must we reduce it?

>>53772709
Current estimates show we must drastically cut back and begin to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere by 2050 or 2060 in order to maintain a modicum of the current biodiversity on this planet. If not I hope you like bacterial slime and jellyfish riddling the ocean.

>>53772789
the problem is heat not this CO2 meme

even if you were to carbon trap all the CO2 in the world you 'd still have the same problem

there are worse greenhouse gases (and liquids) suspended in the athmosphere

>>53772789
>by how much should we reduce it?
>according to our estimates: drastically
Get fucked, asshole. If you could actually set goals and not a slippery slope of regulation, maybe we'd have a decent energy plan to stick to.