Is this debatable?
>>140409334
No, because there are retarded republicans and despicable democrats.
>>140409334
dont think so.
>caring for your own country is people is having no heart
>>140409334
Well it's more like stern but loving father vs doting idiot mother.
>>140409334
no, because democrats don't have hearts either.
there's nothing "compassionate" about forcing people at the point of a gun to pay for government shit that you want to implement. that's nothing close to charity.
>>140409334
more like this
>>140410005
But Republicans do that all the time. Then they cut taxes (without cutting spending) and pretend they are for small government.
>>140409334
I remember when it was the other way around.
flip flop flip
>>140410005
fuck i meant yes just op's question is phrased weirdly
>>140410153
look repubs are bad too but saying the two parties are similar in overall harm is like comparing a candle to a forest fire
there might be a lot of limp wristed republicans, but there's not a single democrat today on the side of freedom
>>140410005
Yeah the absolute tyranny of roads and sidewalks. If only we could be free to be enslaved or dragged to death by roving motorcycle gangs in a perfect government free world where the idea of having obligations to the society you live in is extinct
>>140410466
Nah. It's like comparing a forest fire to a nuclear holocaust. But yea you're mostly right.
>>140409334
hillary clinton with a heart.... hahahahaha
>>140409334
National Socialist has both.
>>140410823
National socialism is all brain, no heart.
>>140410558
>government doesn't steal half your income and use it on useless shit like providing welfare for the morbidly obese and waging counterproductive foreign wars
>"c-clearly this means anarchy will reign!"
what is it with you people
>>140409334
If the heart were shriveled up and black, sure.