Sugar

>>140403348
>unequivocally
irrefutably you dumbass

>>140403348
sugar quells dissent by being nutrient free but dispelling hunger.

>>140404116
>dispelling hunger
Nope

>>140403348
I thought conservatives oppossed regulation?

>>140404676
Being one or the other is idiotic it is most important to be practical

>TFW the free market is literally killing over ten million consumers a year
Logical libertarian reply request request

File: nattybananaingredients.jpg (169KB, 654x997px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 654x997px

>>140403348
Because any complex carbohydrate you eat gets broken down into glucose. Sugar is not somehow evil - in the form of sucrose it's just some glucose and fructose, chemically identical to that found in fruits, and to that broken down from complex carbs like starchs. Do you want to ban rice, too?
The problem isn't sugar, "sugar" is a pop-healthy buzzword, just like "fats" or "cholesterol". The problem is people overeating combined with physical inactivity. Look at data between physically active individuals vs inactive, sedentary individuals: while fructose raises LDL cholesterol in sedentary individuals, such effects are hard to find in healthy, active people. You can find such instances all over in the literature.
>Diabetics with hyperglycemia are over 5x more likely to develop cancer than their non-degenerate counterpart
This is due to insulin, not sugar inherently.

>>140403348
Don't buy sugar and quit crying about what other people eat you retarded faggot.

>>140405730
insulin is a sugar inhibitor and balances levels in the blood converting glucose to fat.

Also sugar is almost always turned into glucose when consumed. Things like Soda have about as much sugar as 100 bananas and rice isn't even worth talking about

Also exercise works as the sugar in your blood is consumed immediately instead of stored and then broken down.

>>140405968
>Quit crying
>Don't eat it
why do we even have laws
If you don't want to steal then don't steal? Let the culprits deal with the consequences why do we need laws?

File: 1400356788722.png (134KB, 334x393px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 334x393px

>>140406332
>Also sugar is almost always turned into glucose when consumed
Glucose is sugar, you moron. "Sugar" usually refers to table sugar, which is sucrose, but glucose is sugar as well.
>Things like Soda have about as much sugar as 100 bananas
Wrong, retard: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2159?manu=&fgcd=&ds=Standard%20Reference

A medium banana weighing 118 grams has 14 grams of sugar. Over half the carbohydrates in a banana consist of sugar, and the riper it gets, the more sugar it will have.
>rice isn't even worth talking about
Every single gram of starches is metabolized into glucose - starch is literally just chained glucose molecules, and upon digestion the bonds are broken and you get glucose. If you eat 100 grams of starch worth of rice, it will be metabolized into approx 100 grams of glucose, aka 100 grams of sugar.
You need to do some more research - this is just embarrassing.

>>140403348
protein is far harsher on the kidneys and intestines than sugar.

File: 1490634171223.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>140406332

Imagine being a retarded brainlet who doesn't know anything about biochemistry

>>140403348
>implying the tarjew should be regulated
if people want to eat or smoke themselves to death, let them. its called individual responsibility. go live in europe if you want every aspect of your life regulated by bureaucrats.

File: 1503775387025.gif (141KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 250x250px

>>140403348

>>140405730
I tend to agree with you, although the glycemic index disproves the notion that all sugars are equal.

>>140407702
All glucose is sugar not all sugar is glucose my friend

There are multiple types of sugars each broken down differently. It is worth noting that tropical races are less likely to get cancer and diabetes as their Blood sugar levels are better regulated. This is thought to be due to the types of sugars that fruit breaks down to that is why there are campaigns that fruit prevents cancer. All nonsense but you don't seem to understand the multiple types of sugars and the digestive process