Trump will not get the Republican Presidential Nomination
>Can Donald Trump really win the 2016 Republican presidential nomination?
>Knowledgable people think he might. They include some journalists, some former Republican consultants and operatives, talk show host Bill Maher and a contestant from season three of NBC’s The Apprentice, who now is co-chairperson of Trump’s Iowa operation.
>But more-knowledgable people think he won’t. They include the quants and geeks, some Republican consultants and operatives, and lots of political scientists.
>A trio of political data experts empanelled by FiveThirtyEight for a podcast earlier this month estimated Trump’s chances of snagging the nomination at 2%, 0% and minus-10%, respectively.
>Donald Trump also happens to be a thrice-married, formerly pro-choice, kind of rude person from New York.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/22/donald-trump-wont-win-republican-presidential-nomination
>>140270877
https://unvis.it/theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/22/donald-trump-wont-win-republican-presidential-nomination
>>140270877
>2015/aug/22
Hillary/Bernouts pls go
>>140270877
>But more-knowledgable people think he won’t. They include the quants and geeks, some Republican consultants and operatives, and lots of political scientists.
Doesn't this pretty much confirm that he will be nominated?
>>140271022
>tfw its 2016 not 2020
I'm retarded.
>>140270948
Why do you always appear in my threads nagging me to archive instead of a direct link? You did it with a CNN article I linked a few days ago. I don't like CNN or the guardian, but what exactly do you think you're going to achieve with this? 99% of /pol/acks use ad blockers anyway jesus. Sometimes I remember to archive but most of the time I cba. Anyway do something with your time that you enjoy.
>>140271615
>>140271812
It's true though, this same Norwegian guy appeared in a bait thread I made a few days ago. I'm posting someone in 2015 saying Trump wouldn't even become the Republican candidate as a joke and /pol/acks are taking me seriously and assuming I'm a liberal. Sometimes I think I'm the only one with a triple digit IQ around here.
>>140272249
Norgebro is a /pol/ treasure
>>140273051
I didn't say anything positive or negative about him, but he needs to relax and do something better with his time. It can't be enjoyable spending your personal time on a Monday evening searching for people linking direct URL's, filling captchas, and linking an archive of the page in a reply. Like I know I'm shitposting on /pol/ because I'm bored and I get a laugh from it sometimes, but what sort of satisfaction can norgebro possibly be getting from his archival obsession?
>>140271615
BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT NORBOT
>>140271615
REEEEEEEEEEE NORBOT IS THE BEST PERSON ON THIS WEBSITE! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
>>140273464
>what sort of satisfaction can norgebro possibly be getting from his archival obsession?
Never underestimate the power of autism
>>140273552
>>140273744
>Anything in my post
>An insult
>>140271615
>He doesnt respect based nordbot
>He doesnt respect the fact he prevents (((Them))) from gettin shekels
>He doesnt realize more and more sites are telling you to turn off adblock before being able to read an article
Gas yourself, Achmed
>>140273464
>what sort of satisfaction can norgebro possibly be getting from his archival obsession?
knowing (((They))) arent getting clickshekels.
>>140273982
>>140274083
>Anything in my post
>Implying disrespect
Nope
>He doesn't realise (they) still get their shekels anyway, and online news was never a significant revenue source for them
>he doesn't realise these websites use ad blockers anyway
Norgebro is just wasting his time. At no point did I insult or disrespect him, you buffoons. I just said he should do something more fun with his time. Like hell if I'd do that with all my personal time.
>>140274226
you realize its a bot and not an actual person doing this, yes?
>>140271615
You're a retard. Ad-blockers don't prevent the sites from recording your visit.
Will Donald Trump ever recover?