Rekt

>Millenial Democrats
i mean, you don't even have to say anything to have a counter argument

Defining a dreamer as an immigrant without a criminal record is self defeating to this argument. Are the only reason theyre in the country is to work, so the fact that its not 100% with jobs is a problem in and of itself.

>>140191587
>100% of illegals have done nothing illegal
Inb4 anchor babies are legal.

File: 1498357485015.jpg (476KB, 843x1034px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 843x1034px

>>140191587
They are criminals by existing here. Fuck off with your dem propaganda you niggerfaggot.

100% of Dreamers have broken the law.. Compare that to the DNC. #SameThing

>>140191587
they could be genius neurosurgeons but they'd still have to go back. what part of GO BACK do these people not understand?

File: c38.png (302KB, 600x445px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 600x445px

>>140191587

>100% of DREAMers have no criminal record
>DREAMer, an illegal immigrant who entered the United States as a minor
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreamer

wait a sec, are you telling me it is LEGAL to illegally cross the border if you are a minor?

>>140191745
They aren't even anchor babies

File: 48596.jpg (19KB, 444x332px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 444x332px

>>140191587
Cool, Trump just solved the Entry Job Market.

Now you can't use the excuse "There are no Jobs"

Good luck Antifa people.

>>140191587
>100% of dreamers have no criminal record

That's a blatant lie if I ever saw one. Even if you forego the fact they're illegal immigrants, quite a significant number have with absolute certainty committed been convicted of criminal activity, quite likely including but not limited theft and violence.

>91% of them have jobs

Which they're probably working for below minimum wage while they live in shithole 2 bedroom 1 bathroom houses along with the rest of their family of 20 just so they can afford to live somewhere because they're taken advantage of by greedy employers, thus driving wages down for everyone.

And even if they were given citizenship they would still work under the table for below minimum wage and not pay taxes as they have always done.

File: illegals go back.gif (461KB, 350x232px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 350x232px

>>140191587

If they're illegal, they're illegal! btfo.

3rd time I saw this thread today

>an aromatic plant with grayish-green leaves that are used as a culinary herb, native to southern Europe and the Mediterranean.

>>140191745

Technically, anchor babies are US citizens. By the 14th amendment, if you are born here, you're a citizen. You can kick out the parents, but not the kids. Don't like it? Good luck repealing the 14th or otherwise creating a new amendment that overrides that portion of the 14th.

That said, Dreamers aren't anchor babies. They're people who came here as children, but were otherwise born outside the country. Trump is within his legal right to deport them if he so chooses.

>>140192329

Even if it's not theft or violence, then it would be basic shit like speeding or car accidents.

>>140193010
the 14th is for babies of slaves brought to america. its interpretation to also mean illegals today can easily be disputed

>>140193010
The 14th Amendment was put in SPECIFICALLY for BLACK SLAVES. It was not meant for anyone else and wasn't used for anyone else until 1982. In fact, this alleged right derives only from a footnote slyly slipped into a Supreme Court opinion by Justice Brennan in 1982

http://humanevents.com/2010/08/04/justice-brennans-footnote-gave-us-anchor-babies/

"The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law and obtaining citizenship for their offspring, nor obtaining benefits at taxpayer expense. Current estimates indicate there may be over 300,000 anchor babies born each year in the U.S., thus causing illegal alien mothers to add more to the U.S. population each year than immigration from all sources in an average year before 1965.

Australia rescinded birthright citizenship in 2007, as did New Zealand in 2006, Ireland in 2005, France in 1993, and the United Kingdom in 1983. This leaves the United States and Canada as the only remaining industrialized nations to grant automatic citizenship to every person born within the borders of the country, irrespective of their parents' nationality or immigration status. "

In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by stating:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will NOT, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:

"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."

http://www.14thamendment.us/birthright_citizenship/original_intent.html

>>140191587

> 100% of dreamers have no criminal record
MY FUCKING ASS!!!

>>140191587
Is this a parody account? How can they be so fucking stupid?

File: illegals.jpg (51KB, 720x289px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x289px

>>140191587
>no criminal record

Really makes you think.

File: hmmmmmm.png (231KB, 734x1110px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 734x1110px

>>140191587
what does illegal mean...