Ancap thread.
>>140159863 was starting to think i hadn't seen one of these in a while
>>140159863
>when your ideology is without flaws, so the only arguments against it are ridiculous straw men
>>140163404
>You could ban or allow the making or reading of these strawman image marcos in your property
Feels good man, I'd totally let my McSlaves watch them on their milisecond break
>>140163404 kek
>>140163698
that's a good one
now all you have to do is slap the text in a .jpg and you'll have yoruself a meme
>>140159863
>>140159863
Serious question here: In an ancap society, what stops someone from buying up all the land and forcing the inhabitants to pay rent, thus making a state?
>>140164118
it's impossible to obtain that much wealth
>>140159863
>>140163711
> every single person in the world would sell their property
>>140159863
These memes
Maybe I don't know what Ancap actually is..
I need more ancap meme balls
>>140164278
>>140164355
Ancap ideology is against copyright ...
>>140166192
I'll take that as a concession.
you can stop posting now
>>140166299
I'm not that same guy you were originally talking to- let's say that 'state' is the size of Delaware. You know who fucking owned all of Delaware? The DuPont family. Well done, flawless ideology, making corporations gods will solve all the worlds ills
>>140166852
corporations have no authority that the state doesn't give them
try again
>>140166973
In sorry what? The wealth that created the chemical company we now know as DuPont came from private, dynastic, oligarical wealth
>>140167235
don't be daft. i was obviously referring to the line:
>making corporations gods
do you even know what a corporation is?
>>140167235
The exact kind of dynastic, oligarch wealth that would continue to dominate, with impunity, in your ridiculous ideology
>>140167397
Okay, you're obviously referring to the title of an entity, which removal of said title would do nothing to the influence the entity wields
>>140167580
no, i'm not.
>>140167668
Okay? So as long as it's a family that has the resources and material wealth to cordon off an area and proclaim it's utter subjugation.. that's somehow different, better and good?
>>140167821
why are you so transfixed on coming up with contrived fantasy scenarios?
do you believe that "regulated" corporations don't abuse people and resources right now?
the only difference between corporate abuse with and without a state, is whether or not a shitty company gets $1 Billion taxpayer dollars when it fails
>>140168142
You mean like the contrived fantasy scenario that was in effect in Delaware during the late 1700s? That contrived fantasy scenario?
>>140168387
and yet it isn't going on now. seems like the problem was self correcting
>>140159863
>>140164278
>It's impossible
>Bill gates deserves 60 gorillion for his hard work
>Can buy 126,000 acre ranch in Montana for 70 million
>>140169546
>buys empty land
>forces people to live on it and be cattle stock???