If a guy is not heterosexual and considers himself a NatSoc,

>>140110151
>not heterosexual
can you be more specific?

>shooting yourself with a label gun
muh validation

>>140110151
I don't care as long as both of then regularly donate to sperm or make a surrogate lady pregnant. Need to continue that white race.

File: 45979248_p0.jpg (293KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 600x800px

>>140110262
Bi or homo. Let's say he prefers boys, though.

>not heterosexual

This is a bullshit made up term and way of thinking. You have a poopdick fetish. Why do you ascribe some special identity to it? Would you do the same if you had a scat fetish or vore fetish? Or would you bury these fetishes deep inside of you, not hook up with other scat fetishists, get a wife, and live a normal life as a normal person?

Stop talking to that other poopdick fetishist you call your "boyfriend," go to church, and find a wife.

>>140110488
*sigh* that precisely the opposite of more specific since there are no other options. in either case I was hoping to push the point that it doesn't really matter how you define sexuality, but how you define *insert meme ideology here* Can't opinions be held that are "close to" but not "exactly" like something written down? why deos it have to exactly match some already written body of text?

Why are you searching for a label to live under? I really hope it's not just to keep up with the virtue signalers.

File: 35896960_p0.jpg (77KB, 450x509px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 450x509px

>>140110532
>church
No fucking way. I'd have a girlfriend if I could, but hell it's too hard to find a girl with at least 50% interests in common.

>>140111138
I know what you mean, but it's doesn't really answer my question with precision besides "muh validation", as you've already said.

I'm not really searching for validation. If NatSoc is not compatible with me, I'll probably search for something different but with similar strenght.

>>140110151
Depends how they act, if it's truly hidden they can't find out so it shouldn't be a problem.
I doubt it's hidden given those lame pics you're posting
Location probably would help, in cali they have too much else to worry about.

>>140111158
You are posting about fetishizing buttcummies while you post Japanese children's cartoons all while bearing a 70 year old German nationalist flag. You see pretty lost and confused, my dude. You could use Christ.

>>140110151
you're just larping for attention. you feel like an edgy dangerous faggot.

you're worthless to everyone except the progressive left

>>140110151
The only reason being gay is not natsoc is because it means they won't have white babies. In this reguard, oil drillers and yellow fever whites are just as bad, or any white that does not have white children.

If a guy is bi and ends up having white kids, I don't care how many times he's fucked a guy in the ass.

>>140111955
>I doubt it's hidden given those lame pics you're posting
I mean hidden IRL.

>>140113766
I like edgy things but I don't understand why you'd call me dangerous.

>>140113921
>hue
>fag
>natsoc

sage. youre just here for attention. kys

File: 1492466533947.jpg (22KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 640x480px

>>140110151
National socialism is a political ideology revolving around the national community and the preservation of said community's health. If you value and actively promote those values, you may be able to consider yourself a national socialist.

Homosexuality is a mental illness. It is not healthy. That isn't to suggest you can't be a national socialist while having an illness, but it distracts from your capability to do so. It makes sense why you don't feel national socialism is compatible with you:

>>140111430

--when you are distracted by cock and balls.